Could it be any more sinister? Allow children to make life-changing decisions about their gender and ‘take action’ against any parents who challenge what is being done to their kids. In the words of the document: ‘It is recognised that the requirement for parental consent or the consent of a legal guardian can be restrictive and problematic for minors.’ Restrictive and problematic for transgender activism and extremism would be a better way of putting it. The Denton document says it is ‘crucial’ there are ‘no limitations’ to ‘gender confirmation treatment’, including ‘no requirement to be diagnosed with gender dysphoria’. It deletes all potential barriers and delays on any child ‘persuaded’ they are living the ‘wrong’ gender to be set on course to puberty blockers and surgery. Maybe someone could give me a better definition of child abuse because I can’t think of one in this moment. Another point is that through epigenetics or passed-on gene sequences the changes in one generation’s transgendered hormonal re-write will passed to the next. Rollonfriday.com reporter Hamilton continues:

The report advises activists to ‘de-medicalise’ their campaigns ‘so that legal gender recognition can be seen in the eyes of the public as distinct from gender confirmation treatments’. It explains that this is because one of the reasons opponents often cite for ‘denying such access to minors’ is the view that ‘young people should not have irreversible surgeries until they are of the age of maturity’.

The document really is a shocker and confirms in writing the experience of parents and wider society of transgender impositions that have become the norm. Such are the sinister extremes demanded by transgender activism that the Denton report warns campaigners to ‘avoid excessive press coverage and exposure’ because the ‘general public is not well informed about trans issues, and therefore misinterpretation can arise’. Translated from the PR-speak this means ‘avoid excessive press coverage and exposure’ because if the ‘general public knew what you really want then horror and fury can arise’. The document describes how activists in Ireland ‘have directly lobbied individual politicians and tried to keep press coverage to a minimum in order to avoid this issue’. It says the chances of success are increased if activists ‘target youth politicians’ who in successful campaigns in Europe ‘brought up the issue at every meeting of any sort – even ones which were not directly relevant, to ensure the issue was at the forefront of everyone’s minds’. You can see why the transgender ‘issue’ involving ‘a telephone box minority’ is everywhere and impinging on everything. Writer James Kirkup featured the Denton document in an article for The Spectator in which he summed up the content (and the transgender agenda) in two sentences:

In short, this is a handbook for lobbying groups that want to remove parental consent over significant aspects of children’s lives … A handbook written by an international law firm and backed by one of the world’s biggest charitable foundations.

Transgender lobbyists will always have the system on their side when they have the Cult on their side. Kirkup said the document explained some transgender mysteries such as why bodies like the police – ‘not famous social liberals’ – were in the vanguard of the transgender transformation of society ‘even to the point of checking our pronouns and harassing elderly ladies who say the wrong thing on Twitter’. Kirkup notes the advice given to activists on how to secure protrans laws. This includes ‘get ahead of the government agenda’ which means publishing ‘progressive’ (New Woke) legislative proposals before governments had time to develop their own and in this way have the proposals of activists simply transferred into official policy. New Woke employs this tactic across all its fronts with the Cult pulling the necessary strings. Kirkup points out that a UK House of Commons select committee report in 2016 ‘adopted several positions from trans groups’ and was followed in 2017 by ‘a government plan to adopt self-identification of legal gender’. Another way to scam the public is to ‘tie your campaign to more popular reform’, the Denton document says. Slip it in alongside something that most people would support. This happens constantly with government and lobby groups to hide otherwise controversial plans behind non-controversial legislation. The document offers an example:

In Ireland, Denmark and Norway, changes to the law on legal gender recognition were put through at the same time as other more popular reforms such as marriage equality legislation. This provided a veil of protection, particularly in Ireland, where marriage equality was strongly supported, but gender identity remained a more difficult issue to win public support for.

The Denton document stresses that countries where deletion of parental rights over their children’s gender decisions have moved with the greatest speed have been those where trans lobby groups have been successful in stopping the wider public learning the extreme nature of the plans and the consequences for kids before they were a fait accompli.

It’s about ‘discrimination’? Yeah, right

A good way to assess the genuineness of New Woke activism is to observe how they treat members of the community they claim to be representing who don’t support the party line. In all aspects of New Wokeness the response to this is the same – attack them, abuse them and do everything you can to silence them. New Woke censorship has taken its blueprint from the ‘anti-Semitism’ industry Protection Racket specifically created to protect the far right Sabbatian-Frankist-controlled government in Israel from criticism and not to protect Jewish people from discrimination. The same approach can be witnessed every day with climate change, ‘anti-racism’, extreme feminist, gay and transgender activism. You may care about the environment, oppose racism or be a woman, gay or transgender, but that doesn’t matter if you don’t believe everything we tell you. Those who have been through gender transition, regretted that and warned others, are subjected every time to abuse from transgender activists who set out to gag them. I have read books by transitioned people who had their lives destroyed by the decision they were encouraged to take by the ‘experts’ and they are doing this to children. It is absolutely tragic to see how their lives have been devastated. In many cases the reason they initially questioned their gender was being sexually abused as a child that led to a psychological state in which they wanted to be a different gender to the one that was abused. Psychological support and understanding was what they needed. Instead the puberty blockers were handed out and their lives torn apart. One example is Debbie Karemer from Hertfordshire in England who lived as a man for 17 years only to realise after counselling that she was suffering the psychological consequences of sexual abuse. She said other transgender people she knows regret their surgery and are too frightened of the activist backlash to be honest about it. See what I mean – she said they weren’t brave enough to tell their story. Why do they need to summon such courage? Is it because of the reaction of general public? No – because of the reaction of transgender activists who are a tyranny and everything they attack others for being. In fact, they could not qualify for any version of New Woke if they didn’t condemn others for what they do. That’s in the contract.

Transgender activist extremism and its contempt for genuinely transgender people and for freedom of speech and opinion was confirmed in two stories and their aftermath in 2019. Debbie Hayton, a 51-year-old physics teacher in the English Midlands, changed her gender from male to female in 2012, but sent transgender activists into a fury of knicker-twisting (or underpant-twisting) when she wore a t-shirt that said: ‘Trans women are men. Get over it.’ Well, my goodness, you could hear the sound of gusset tearing from ten miles away. Debbie wore the shirt at an event organised by campaign group Fair Play for Women which has not been the case since transgender storm troopers imposed their will (the Cult’s will) over women’s rights. Hayton served on the LGBT+ committee of the New Woke-hijacked Trades Union Congress (TUC). This was irrelevant once she became a blasphemer and twelve members of the committee complained to TUC General Secretary Frances O’Grady. They said that wearing the shirt had ‘gone beyond discourse, and the expression of alternative viewpoints, and is now propagating hate speech against the trans community.’ Don’t be ridiculous, oh, sorry, you are being. New Woke definition of ‘hate speech’: ‘Any statement that we don’t want people to hear.’ I love the bit about going beyond discourse and alternative viewpoints – there are no alternative viewpoints about transgenderism that activists don’t want to silence. Nicola Williams, founder of Fair Play for Women, summed it up when she said:

Accusations of transphobia are thrown at women so often for so little that the word has lost all meaning … When even trans people can get called transphobes, I hope people now understand how ludicrous and far-fetched these attacks have always been. The trans movement has been hijacked by gender extremists.

Exactly right and in their extremes of arrogance they are destroying freedom on behalf of the Cult. The British Labour Party, closely-associated with the TUC, has long been licking the arse of the ‘anti-Semitism’ industry Protection Racket in 24-hour shifts. Now the same is happening with transgender extremists. Getting slaughtered at the polls in 2019 was no Wake-up call for the Labour Party. Woke doesn’t do Wake. Would-be Labour leader Rebecca Long-Bailey supported a campaign to label a party women’s rights organisation as a ‘transexclusionist hate group’. The Labour Campaign for Trans Rights published a plan designed to ‘rid the Labour Party of transphobia and to stand up for trans people’. The Protection Racket modus operandi is repeated. Well, if it works why not? It got rid of anyone who criticised Israel and now it can be used to delete the membership of anyone that won’t concede their own rights to transgender extremism. The Long-Bailey-supported campaign called for ‘expulsion from the Labour Party of those who express bigoted, transphobic views’. Keir Starmer, who beat Long-Bailey for the leadership of this excuse-for-an-opposition party, is another New Woker who lives on his knees with his tongue extended pointing to Tel Aviv. The Labour Party was already on a life-support machine and then someone switched it off. The New Woke war on women’s rights is constantly gathering pace. The students union at Leicester University in the city where I was born changed International Women’s Day into International Womxn’s Day in reference to ‘transgender women’ to include a ‘more inclusive spelling of women’. This is the same student body that elected a trans woman called Dan Orr to the position of women’s officer. International Women’s Day of 2020 also saw Sefton Council in the UK take down two flags at town halls which displayed the dictionary definition of ‘woman’ as an ‘adult human female’. It took a single complaint from a New Woke man to have the flags taken down. A bloke posting with the name ‘Adrian Harrop’ told the council: ‘… the flag you’re flying at the moment is a hostile transphobic dog whistle, recognised as a symbol and brand of one of Britain’s most outspoken and visible trans-antagonists, and the leader of a transphobic hate group.’ The dictionary definition of woman is now transphobic and offensive. I did mention that male and female sexes are the target of the Cult didn’t I?

Promotion and relegation

Figure 347: The illusion of inclusion and equality. Privilege (ironically) is the real goal.

Figure 348: It’s already well underway. (Image Gareth Icke.)

Women were once top of the PC sexual hierarchy in its early days. Now this has entered the next stage of the Totalitarian Tiptoe to the no-gender human they have given way to the transgender movement. Women who challenge the imposition of transgender rights on women’s rights have become enemies of the revolution (Fig 347 ). No-gender people will eventually take over and transgenders will become enemies of the revolution. This is how it works. Women are falling down the PC hierarchy because they are a gender and their only remaining role from the Cult’s perspective is to diminish the influence of men before themselves being deleted. How about men and women coming together in mutual support? How about that for an idea? Far more important than women to the Cult is mass immigration of other cultures into Western Society and this also puts those cultures and religions above women in the PC hierarchy. New Wokeness says it stands for women’s rights while silencing criticism and exposure of religions that treat women like slaves and garbage. Criticism cannot be allowed, nor exposure of the effect of mass immigration of other cultures in transforming communities, oppressing women and reducing work opportunities. That would open the whole mass-immigration strategy to public questioning and any open debate must be stopped. This is the real reason that ultra-Zionist censors say they won’t debate with ‘anti-Semites’ while ‘anti-racist’ censors often won’t debate with ‘racists’ or ‘anti-transphobia’ censors with ‘transphobes’. They know they will lose on the facts and they make an excuse to avoid that exposure. Women who highlight the effect on rape crisis centres, single-sex hospital wards and women’s sport of ‘gender self-ID’ (decide your gender any time you want) are dismissed as ‘TERFs’, or ‘trans-exclusionary radical feminists’ (Fig 348 overleaf). It is an age-old trick for those with extreme positions to paint their reasonable opposition as extremists. This happens right across the New Woke arena and with ultra-Zionists who treat Palestinians like vermin while branding any challenge to that as ‘anti-Semitic’. Another example of the transgender war on free speech was that of Maya Forstater, a tax expert at the think tank Center for Global Development, who did not have her contract renewed (she was fired) after posting tweets disagreeing with government plans to let people declare their own gender without any supporting evidence. She demanded her right to refer to people by the gender she felt appropriate and not by how she was told to do so. It’s an opinion that she has a right to have in any free society. Not, however, according to employment judge James Tayler who spouted New Woke orthodoxy in his verdict after Forstater appealed against her dismissal to an employment tribunal (she never stood a chance). Mr Woke Tayler said with jaw-dropping irony that her views were ‘not worthy of respect in a democratic society’. But, of course, Tayler’s are because they represent the imposed orthodoxy. To have someone legally judging others who clearly does not grasp the basic tenets of freedom or democracy is both appalling and par for the course in the Brave New Woke World. Once you set the perceptual blueprint for what society must believe you co-opt the entire system including academia, government agencies, police and judiciary to enforce that blueprint. Go to court with something the system supports and you will win almost no matter what the evidence. Go to court with something the system does not support and you will invariably lose. This is how society is stitched up all over the world. Independent judiciary?? You must be joking. Christians have lost cases over the right to express their beliefs, such as wearing a cross, while vegans who avoid buses because flies hit windscreens win cases to protect their beliefs. The question is not about right or wrong; it’s whether the Cult via authority wants it or doesn’t. How much abuse you get from New Wokers is directly associated with where your subject of criticism stands in the PC hierarchy.

Harry Potty

Maya Forstater made the intelligent response to Judge Woke Tayler that ‘framing the question of transgender inclusion as an argument that male people should be allowed into women’s spaces discounts women’s rights to privacy and is fundamentally illiberal (it is like forcing Jewish people to eat pork)’. Her solicitor Peter Daly said: ‘Had our client been successful, she would have established in law protection for people – on any side of this debate – to express their beliefs without fear of being discriminated against.’ No wonder she lost. The decision becomes all the more outrageous when you see a picture of the person Forstater refused to call ‘They’ – local Dundee councillor Gregor Murray who looks exactly like a man including a male haircut and a beard. He was suspended for two months in May, 2019, for calling feminist critics ‘scum’, ‘hateful’ and ‘vile’. I wonder if that fits Judge Tayler’s criteria for being worthy of respect in a democratic society? The controversy of Tayler’s ludicrous decision kicked off further when Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling posted this:

Dress however you please.

Call yourself whatever you like.

Sleep with any consenting adult who’ll have you.

Live your best life in peace and security.

But force women out of their jobs for stating that sex is real?

#IStandWithMaya #ThisIsNotADrill.’

This was the cue for New Woke virtue-signalling to reach still new heights of gusset wringing as ‘human rights’ organisations including the New Woke Amnesty UK gushed forth in condemnation of Rowling that ‘trans rights are human rights’. And, er … women’s rights? How about the right to free speech and opinion? My god, it’s pathetic. The response was ironic in that Rowling often tweets in support of multiple New Woke causes. This is no defence. Your loyalty to Wokeness must be total in every facet and form or you are an enemy of the revolution. Star Wars actor Mark Hamill further infuriated the permanently-infuriated New Woke Mafioso by ‘liking’ the Rowling tweet and as with so many in the world of spineless celebrity he fell to his knees begging for forgiveness:

Ignorance is no excuse, but I liked the tweet without understanding what the last line or hashtags meant. It was the 1st 4 lines I liked & I didn’t realize it had any transphobic connotation.

Put your tongue back in, mate, and consider the ‘connotations’ of your gutlessness for human freedom.