Dr Andrew Kaufman introduced a devastating piece of information which relates to something called ‘exosomes’. Cells release exosomes all the time but they increase substantially when there are toxins in the tissues. They also communicate a warning about a problem to remote parts of the body and can even remove toxins from the extracellular space. Any form of toxin, whether chemical or electromagnetic, will cause cells to release exosomes as part of the body’s system to protect from cell damage and death. Kaufman shows images of exosomes and what is alleged to be ‘Covid-19’ under the microscope and they are … exactly the same in every relevant way (Fig 380 ). They both attach to the same cell receptors, contain the same genetic material in the form of RNA or ribonucleic acid, and both are found in lung fluid which is what the Chinese initially took from those first few patients before claiming the cause of their illness was a ‘virus’ (Fig 381 ). There is a reason they mirror each other – they are the same phenomenon . James Hildreth MD, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Meharry Medical College at Johns Hopkins, a researcher into HIV, said of viruses: ‘The virus is fully an exosome in every sense of the word.’ Exosomes, a natural mechanism for cells to cleanse themselves and alert other cells, and what is claimed to be ‘Covid-19’, are the same thing. Cult operatives in China and like-agents throughout the world simply renamed exosomes as ‘isolated Covid-19’ and developed a ‘test’ that produced a positive for RNA of unknown origin now transformed in the public mind into a non-existent ‘virus’ dubbed ‘Covid-19’. Some of the conditions that trigger the release of exosomes (‘Covid-19’) include: Toxicity; fear and stress see ‘virus’ hysteria and lockdowns; infection; injury; immune system responses; asthma; disease; and electromagnetic radiation which is getting more powerful by the day. Andrew Kaufman also points out that part of the process of identifying the genetic material involves adding antibiotics which cause the cells to release exosomes into the sample. They have renamed a natural immune reaction ‘Covid-19’ knowing that large numbers of people will test positive for that immune response and content within a genetic material RNA code. When people test positive and then die from other causes doctors are told to put ‘Covid-19’ on the death certificate as I will show. This is how the number of ‘cases’ and ‘deaths’ from the non-existent ‘Covid-19’ have been scammed into a widespread public perception about a ‘deadly virus’ that can only be stopped by lockdown, mass global house arrest, destroying the independent livelihood of potentially billions, and a Bill Gates-produced mandatory ‘vaccine’.

Can you ‘catch’ a virus?

Lockdown and ‘social distancing’ have been justified by the authorities on the grounds of protecting the public from an infectious disease – a ‘virus’ that has never been shown to exist. Then there is the question of whether even if the ‘virus’ was real that anyone could catch it from other people when a virus needs host cells to replicate. The Encyclopedia Britannica defines a virus as an agent that ‘can multiply only in living cells of animals, plants, or bacteria’ and says ‘they cannot reproduce and carry on metabolic processes without a host cell‘. Can ‘Covid-19’ therefore be ‘caught’ from work surfaces, door handles, and money and how can it jump between humans or animals and humans when it requires a cellular host inside a body? As the lockdowns continued, Professor Hendrik Streeck, a virologist working on the German response to the ‘pandemic’, said the ‘virus’ had not been spread by shopping or going to the hairdresser. His studies in one ‘infected’ home found it ‘did not have any live virus on any surface’ including on phones, door knobs or even the pet cat’s fur. ‘We know it’s not a smear infection that is transmitted by touching objects’, he said, and he believed it could only be transmitted by very close contact. I would say from what I’ve read that even that is not correct, or at least unproven. Meanwhile, the public was ordered to keep six-feet from other people, including when standing in the rain waiting to enter a one-in, one-out store, and to stay at home out of the sun while using sanitiser to wash every surface. Streeck’s words take us into the territory of Dawn Lester and David Parker in their book widely-quoted by inquiring physicians, What Really Makes You Ill – Why everything you thought you knew about disease is wrong. Lester and Parker seriously question that a ‘virus’ can be transmitted between people or people and animals and they point out there is no provable scientific evidence to show that it can. They are not alone in this assertion either. The book quotes the establishment definition of a ‘virus’ as ‘a minute particle that is capable of replication but only within living cells’. The authors write:

The definition also claims that viruses are the cause of many diseases, as if this has been definitively proven. But this is not the case; there is no original scientific evidence that definitively demonstrates that any virus is the cause of any disease. The burden of proof for any theory lies with those who proposed it; but none of the existing documents provides ‘proof’ that supports the claim that ‘viruses’ are pathogens.

How can a natural immune response – which is what a ‘virus’ really is – cause or transmit disease? The exosome reaction is a response to a problem (poisoned or otherwise injured cells) and not the problem itself. To say otherwise is to say that firefighters responding to a blaze are the fire . The very word ‘virus’ comes from a Latin word meaning ‘poison’. Various manifestations of ‘pus’, as with smallpox, were once associated with the word ‘virus’. Lester and Parker quote Dr Lynn Margulis, acclaimed biologist and member of the National Academy of Sciences, as saying that viruses are not even alive in her definition:

They are not alive since outside living cells they do nothing, ever. Viruses require the metabolism of the live cell because they lack the requisites to generate their own. Metabolism, the incessant chemistry of self-maintenance, is an essential feature of life. Viruses lack this.

Margulis further said that ‘… any virus outside the membrane of a live cell is inert’ and inert means ‘lacking the ability or strength to move’. Wow, ‘deadly viruses’ suddenly seem a lot less scary, eh? Lester and Parker ask how inert ‘virus’ particles that cannot move are supposed to somehow be transmitted between people and enter cells to ‘infect’ them. This poses a similar problem to medical authority as that faced by the inconvenient fact for the Climate Cult that carbon dioxide has to double in volume to affect temperature by any significant degree. This is not going to happen and the climate extremists have had to invent a whole cover story about ‘feedback loops’ to overcome these facts and claim that CO2 is dangerous. In the same way virus particles outside a living host cannot move and without that they can’t be passed on to ‘infect’ anyone. Hold on a while and I’ll work something out. Let me think. Ah, yes, they hitch a ride on particles that can move and then drop off at just the right time to enter a body. Phew – do you think they’ll buy that? This is what is claimed to explain the mystery although how this is supposed to happen has never been explained. Lester and Parker write:

The transmission of any viral particle attached to saliva or mucous travelling through the air has never been observed; viral particles are only ever observed in a laboratory under an electron microscope. The transmission of viruses in the air is an assumption; as is their ability to travel through the human body.

The authors note that investigations, including those by virologists, have ‘failed to unearth any original papers that conclusively prove that any virus is the cause of any disease. Functions attributed to viruses in the cause of disease were based on assumptions and extrapolations from laboratory experiments that had not only failed to prove, but were incapable of proving, that viruses cause disease. ‘The inert, non-living particles known as viruses do not possess the ability to perform such functions because they lack the necessary mechanisms.’ So what is the point of ‘social distancing’, masks and lockdown? There is none. What divides people more than wearing masks hiding facial expressions and yet they were seen everywhere as people once again unquestioningly believed they would offer protection from the virus that didn’t exist. Pores in the masks are far bigger than viral particles and Dr Kaufman described this as like putting up a chain-link fence to stop mosquitoes. He also warned that masks restrict breathing which can be ‘problematic’ with healthy people never mind those with asthma or lung and airway disease. For them it could be devastating. Masks, social distancing – none of this is about health. It’s about control and economic destruction. By the way, newspapers were quick to claim that the ‘virus’ could be caught from handling money (wrong), but they emphasised that it cannot be caught from handling newspapers. How come it can be ‘passed on’ through paper money, but not paper newspapers? The newspapers are selling newspapers and not money. My god, it’s pathetic.

The propaganda has been so incessant that to suggest there is no evidence of a ‘Covid-19’ is to be crazy by definition to most people. They wouldn’t lie that much, surely? Oh, they would . Absolute super-massive whoppers are their calling card – the bigger the lie the more will believe it. The response by Cult-controlled Silicon Valley to two videos within days of each other was very significant with regard to this. The first was an interview I did with Brian Rose at London Real that was live-streamed and attracted the second-biggest live-stream audience in the world that day on YouTube. Within minutes of completion and with more than 300,000 already watching the recording YouTube deleted the video followed quickly by Vimeo and Facebook. The latter version had been watched a million times before Facebook pulled the plug. The mainstream media and sadly much of the alternative focussed on what I said about a 5G angle to current events which was only a relatively small part of the interview. The whole thrust of what I said was to question the existence of ‘Covid-19’. A few days later my son, Jaymie, interviewed Andrew Kaufman for Davidicke.com in a video that did not even mention 5G, but it was deleted by YouTube after passing 300,000 views. The common denominator of both deleted videos was not 5G – it was to question the existence of ‘Covid-19’ which, when widely known, would bring down the house of cards. The unthinkable needs to be thought when the evidence points in that direction. I have been constantly misquoted as saying that 5G is causing the ‘virus’ which is rather difficult to sustain when I am saying there is no ‘Covid-19’ virus. My point has been that 5G can trigger symptoms that have been called ‘Covid-19’ which is very different from 5G ‘causing the virus’.

How the scam works – a scientist explains

In late March, 2020, I received an email from Sir Julian Rose, a writer, researcher, and known in the UK for his promotion of organic farming. He sent me an explanation of the coronavirus hoax sent to him by an American scientist friend who works in the healthcare field. It is a superb breakdown of the systematic deceit and absolutely supports many of the findings of Dr Andrew Kaufman. The scientist said they were not testing people specifically for ‘Covid-19’, but for any strain of a coronavirus of which there are a long list. ‘There are no reliable tests for a specific Covid-19 virus’, he said. Nor were there any reliable agencies or media outlets for reporting numbers of actual Covid-19 virus cases. ‘Every action and reaction to Covid-19 is based on totally flawed data and we simply cannot make accurate assessments.’ He said this was why most people diagnosed with ‘Covid-19’ were showing nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms. ‘That’s because most Coronavirus strains are nothing more than cold/flu like symptoms.’ An 84-year-old German man tested positive for ‘Covid-19’, his entire nursing home was quarantined, and then he was found to have only a common cold. The Tanzania government sent samples from a pawpaw and a goat to the WHO for testing (to expose the scam) and both came back positive for ‘Covid-19’. The PCR test used to detect ‘Covid-19’ does not do that, the scientist said, but instead ‘basically takes a sample of your cells and amplifies any RNA to look for “viral sequences”, i.e. bits of non-human RNA that seem to match parts of a known viral genome’. The problem he said was that … the test is known not to work :

It uses ‘amplification’ which means taking a very, very tiny amount of RNA and growing it exponentially until it can be analyzed. Obviously any minute contaminations in the sample will also be amplified leading to potentially gross errors of discovery. Additionally, it’s only looking for partial viral sequences, not whole genomes, so identifying a single pathogen is next to impossible even if you ignore the other issues.

He said what he called the ‘Mickey Mouse test kits’ that were being sent out to hospitals told analysts – ‘at best’ – that you have some viral (RNA) in your cells. This was irrelevant because most people had coronavirus (RNA) most of the time:

It may tell you the viral sequence is related to a specific type of virus – say the huge family of coronavirus. But that’s all. The idea these kits can isolate a specific virus like Covid-19 is nonsense.

He said the other issue was ‘viral load’. The PCR ‘Covid-19’ test (that isn’t) works by amplifying minute amounts of RNA. It was therefore useless at telling you how much virus you may have – the only question that really matters when it comes to diagnosing illness:

Everyone will have a few viruses kicking round in their system at any time, and most will not cause illness because their quantities are too small. For a virus to sicken you – you need a lot of it, a massive amount of it.

But PCR does not test viral load They use qualitative rather than quantitative PCR and therefore can’t determine if a virus is present in sufficient quantities to sicken you. If you feel sick and get a PCR test any random virus RNA might be identified even if they aren’t at all involved in your sickness which leads to false diagnosis.

What is said here is supported by Kary Mullis who won the Nobel Prize in Science for inventing the PCR in the 1980s. Yes, the inventor of the PCR test said that it cannot accurately test for infectious diseases and yet this is what the test is being used for with regard to ‘Covid-19’. Mullis said: ‘Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.’ He said that PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively , but by its very nature the test is unsuited for quantity. Mullis said there was a common misimpression that the viral load tests count the number of viruses in the blood, but the test could not detect free, infectious viruses at all . The test could detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves. You can see from all this that the numbers of cases and therefore deaths from ‘Covid-19’ are utterly unsupportable. The scientist said coronavirus is incredibly common. ‘A large percentage of the world human population will have covi … in them in small quantities even if they are perfectly well or sick with some other pathogen.’ He asked: ‘Do you see where this is going yet?’ All this meant that ‘if you want to create a totally false panic about a totally false pandemic – pick a coronavirus’:

They are incredibly common and there’s tons of them. A very high percentage of people who have become sick by other means (flu, bacterial pneumonia, anything) will have a positive PCR test for covi even if you’re doing them properly and ruling out contamination, simply because coronaviruses are so common. There are hundreds of thousands of flu and pneumonia victims in hospitals throughout the world at any one time.

He said all you needed to do was select the sickest of these people in a single location – ‘say Wuhan’ – and administer PCR tests to them. You then claim that anyone showing viral sequences similar to a coronavirus ‘which will inevitably be quite a few’ is suffering from a ‘new’ disease:

Since you already selected the sickest flu cases a fairly high proportion of your sample will go on to die. You can then say this ‘new’ virus has a CFR case fatality rate higher than the flu and use this to infuse more concern and do more tests which will of course produce more ‘cases’, which expands the testing, which produces yet more ‘cases’ and so on and so on.

Before long you have your ‘pandemic’, and all you have done is use a simple test kit trick to convert the worst flu and pneumonia cases into something new that doesn’t actually exist my emphasis.

The scientist said you then ‘just run the same scam in other countries’ and make sure to keep the fear message running high ‘so that people will feel panicky and less able to think critically’. The only problem to overcome was the fact there is no actual new deadly pathogen but just regular sick people. This meant that deaths from the ‘new deadly pathogen’ are going to be way too low for a real new deadly virus pandemic, but he said this could be overcome in the following ways – all of which would go on to happen:

1. You can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent you underpin this with fake ‘computer projections’. Use this as an excuse to quarantine everyone and then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead.

2. You can tell people that ‘minimizing’ the dangers is irresponsible and bully them into not talking about numbers.

3. You can talk crap about made up numbers hoping to blind people with pseudoscience.

4. You can start testing well people (who, of course, will also likely have shreds of coronavirus RNA in them) and thus inflate your ‘case figures’ with ‘asymptomatic carriers’ (you will of course have to spin that to sound deadly even though any virologist knows the more symptom-less cases you have the less deadly is your pathogen.

He said that if you take these simple steps ‘you can have your own entirely manufactured pandemic up and running in weeks’. In short the authorities cannot ‘confirm’ something for which there is no accurate test and they certainly cannot produce a vaccine as Cult asset Bill Gates (a lot more to come) soon began to peddle on the back of the ‘crisis’. What the scientist and Andrew Kaufman had said would be supported by an ever-increasing body of evidence. My son Gareth and I live hours apart but we both had exactly the symptoms of ‘Covid-19’ in the run-up to Christmas, 2019, before the scare began. I was later to learn that others did, too. I am very rarely ill because I am blessed with a strong immune system which I constantly boost with the daily supplements missing from the modern diet and Gaz almost never gets ill for the same reason with his immune system on fire because it wasn’t undermined by childhood vaccination. Gaz and myself both had a highly unusual experience of illness when we went down at the same time with what would now be called ‘Covid-19 symptoms’ – every one of them. It wasn’t pleasant for a few days with coughing, aches and a mild fever, but we both carried on working and I wrote some of this book in that period. The immune system did its job without doctor involvement. The point is that if we had those same symptoms a few weeks later we would have been dubbed ‘Covid-19 victims’. Tens of thousands of people die in the United States alone every winter from flu (many with pneumonia complications) with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) figures recording that 45 million Americans were diagnosed with flu in 2017-2018 of which 61,000 died. Some reports said 80,000. Anyone remember the same hysteria that we have seen with ‘Covid-19’? Around 250,000 Americans are admitted to hospital with pneumonia every year and about 50,000 die. With the manipulation of death certificates those people are all potential ‘Covid-19’ fake statistics and then add the fact that 65 million people suffer from respiratory disease every year with three million deaths which makes it the third biggest cause of death worldwide.

Where did the numbers and ‘projections’ come from?

The serious lack of enough dead people to justify the ‘deadly virus’ fear-fest was dealt with as the scientist said it would be. They said that although people were not dying in big numbers yet that was going to happen (‘you can claim this is just the beginning and more deaths are imminent’) and when the numbers didn’t materialise they said it was because of the lockdown (‘then claim the quarantine prevented the expected millions of dead’). The death projections were never going to happen and their purveyors knew that. They were simply falsely created to secure the lockdowns for purposes of economic catastrophe and control over billions. The experience of Japan which avoided draconian lockdowns exposes the mendacity that lockdowns affected events except to crash the world economy for very sinister motives. With the figures being fixed through tests and death certificates what difference would either lockdown or no lockdown have made? It is worth remembering this at all times: Statistics don’t speak for themselves – they speak for those that compiled them. If you take the example of the UK – the same happened globally – the outrageously exaggerated projections of deaths (to justify house arrest for billions) came from … computer models . You know, the same technique used with the ludicrous exaggerations of climate change computer models which have proved so laughably inaccurate, but so useful to sell the climate lie. It is so easy to get the projection you want when all you need to do is upload shite to download shite. Andrew Kaufman has worked in computer modelling and explained how easy it is to fix the outcome. Computer ‘projections’ depend on the nature of the data input from which the ‘projections’ are produced. The ‘Covid-19’ projection insanity was that up to ‘500,000 people will die in the UK if we don’t have lockdown’ . I’ll repeat that just to let the lunacy of this sink in: ‘500,000 people will die in the UK if we don’t have lockdown’. This was the work of Neil Ferguson, Professor of Mathematical Biology and head of the MRC Center for Global Infectious Disease Analysis (funded by Bill Gates and his vaccinate-the-world fronts Gavi and the Global Fund). Business Insider said of the Ferguson operation:

It gets tens of millions of dollars in annual funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and works with the UK National Health Service, the US Centres for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC), and is tasked with supplying the World Health Organization with ‘rapid analysis of urgent infectious disease problems’.

Figure 382:Neil Ferguson – UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson and other politicians believed Ferguson’s ludicrous computer ‘projections’ and utter disaster followed in destroyed lives and livelihoods. (Image by Gareth Icke.)