Figure 277: Greta and parents promoting Antifa, a violent ‘anti-hate’ hate group so beloved of New Woke.

Figure 278: Pawn in a game she doesn’t begin to understand.

Figure 279: Saint Greta, the Climate Goddess.

I guess another coincidence is that a Thunberg climate change mentor is German climate politician Luisa-Marie Neubauer who is an asset of the ONE Movement funded by other Cult assets like Bill Gates and George Soros (yes, them again) and involving their mate, virtue-signalling rock singer Bono. Soros funds other Thunberg-connected organisations. Luisa-Marie Neubauer has appeared with Thunberg at many public events. ONE is among the most obvious of New Woke astroturf operations you could imagine. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation website describes ONE as an organisation that ‘pursues its goals through policy advocacy, grassroots mobilization, communications, and creative campaigning’ which is straight off the pages of the New Woke manipulation manual. The website continues: ‘ONE also mobilizes its 3.2 million members to pressure policymakers to increase their effort, accountability, and transparency in the fight against disease and poverty, particularly in Africa.’ Multi-billionaires care so deeply about poverty, you see. ONE makes ‘the most of technology and social media … and has … also become a leading force in educating the public about global health and development and in changing perceptions about aid and its impact’. If we translate that from the bullshit ONE campaigns for the Cult agenda just like the Open Society network of Soros. Thunberg and her parents profess to be ‘anti-fascist’ in their ‘intersectionality’ with other New Woke sectors and all three have been photographed in t-shirts promoting the violent ‘anti-fascist’ fascist group, Antifa (Fig 277 ). ‘I didn’t know’, said Greta. Oh, really – what about your parents? Human-caused climate change is an elite scam and why wouldn’t there be all these elite connections to its propaganda princess? Thunberg is just their unknowing and increasingly arrogant stooge. In my view her climate extremist parents should be ashamed of how they allow her to be exploited and have played such a central role in that. Her obsessive-compulsive disorder can be clearly seen in her unquestioning obsession with a climate end-of-the-world and it’s sad to witness such outrageous exploitation (Fig 278 ). The Cult of Greta now includes a huge painting of her looking down in distain over New Woke and shit-infested San Francisco and her every public move is documented by the media in a colossal exercise in public relations programming – especially of the young (Fig 279 ). A further crucial part of the elite promotion of Thunberg is to drive a wedge between old and young, adults and children. This was her carefully-scripted speech to the UN in 2019 and all elements of the Climate Cult agenda are there:

My message is that we’ll be watching you. This is all wrong. I shouldn’t be up here. I should be back in school on the other side of the ocean Well, go then. Yet you all come to us young people for hope. How dare you! Divide young and old by blaming the old for something that’s not happening. You have stolen my dreams and my childhood with your empty words. No, Greta, those exploiting you have stolen your childhood. And yet I’m one of the lucky ones. People are suffering. People are dying not from human-caused climate change they’re not. Entire ecosystems are collapsing not from human-caused climate change they’re not. We are in the beginning of a mass extinction no, we’re not, and all you can talk about is money and fairy tales of eternal economic growth which the Cult wants to delete for the mass of the population. How dare you! Ditto to you, Greta.

For more than 30 years, the science has been crystal clear like hell it has. How dare you continue to look away and come here saying that you’re doing enough, when the politics and solutions needed are still nowhere in sight. You say you hear us and that you understand the urgency. But no matter how sad and angry I am, I do not want to believe that. Because if you really understood the situation and still kept on failing to act, then you would be evil. And that I refuse to believe. So how evil are those seeking to terrify the young that their world is going to end when it’s all a gigantic hoax to delete their freedom for life?

The popular idea of cutting our emissions in half in 10 years only gives us a 50% chance of staying below 1.5 degrees, and the risk of setting off irreversible chain reactions beyond human control chain-reactions that don’t exist. Fifty percent may be acceptable to you. But those numbers do not include tipping points made up to explain the lack of CO2 impact, most feedback loops ditto, additional warming hidden by toxic air pollution or the aspects of equity and climate justice more bunkum. They also rely on my generation divide, divide sucking hundreds of billions of tons of your CO2 the gas of life out of the air with technologies that barely exist. So a 50% risk is simply not acceptable to us – we who have to live with the consequences divide, divide.

To have a 67% chance of staying below a 1.5 degrees global temperature rise – the best odds given by the Cult-created Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – the world had 420 gigatons of CO2 left to emit back on Jan. 1st, 2018. Today that figure is already down to less than 350 gigatons. How dare you pretend that this can be solved with just ‘business as usual’ and some technical solutions? With today’s emissions levels, that remaining CO2 budget will be entirely gone within less than eight and a half years.

There will not be any solutions or plans presented in line with these figures here today, because these numbers are too uncomfortable. And you are still not mature enough to tell it like it is but you are Greta by repeating the crap you have been told to say?. You are failing us. But the young people are starting to understand your betrayal divide, divide. The eyes of all future generations are upon you divide, divide. And if you choose to fail us, I say: We will never forgive you divide, divide.

We will not let you get away with this. Right here, right now is where we draw the line. The world is waking up. And change is coming, whether you like it or not.

Figure 280: The Cult is desperate to turn the young against the old.

Figure 281: The plan is now so transparent. (Image Gareth Icke.)

Yes, Greta, the Cult’s change is coming if we and your generation believe garbage like that. We are witnessing yet another inversion in which children tell adults what they should do. There are many stupid adults, large numbers of which are in politics. There are some aware children who have not allowed the Cult to program their perceptions (Greta Thunberg is not one of them). But the idea that children know better in general than intelligent adults with decades of experience is absurd. When I was six, twelve and sixteen I would not have dreamed of telling the world what should be done because, like those of the same age today, I hadn’t lived long enough to credibly know. The young-old inversion has a clear motive for the Cult: Children and young people today have been subjected to the perception program at its most extreme and it wants those perceptions to prevail and transform society in its image. Program the kids and then have their will imposed on adults who will have known life and experience before child-programming reached its current extremes. No one ever asks Greta Thunberg how many hundreds of millions will die if her carbon targets are met through loss of jobs, food and warmth. The climate hoax divides advocates and ‘deniers’ and splits young from old on the grounds that the old are responsible for the ‘existential threat’ to the young (Fig 280 ). The German branch of the school strike organisation Fridays for Future, officially founded and copyrighted by Greta Thunberg, promoted this agenda when it tweeted: ‘Why do grandparents talk to us each year? They won’t be around much longer.’ German public broadcaster WDR produced a song video featuring a choir of young girls castigating older people for climate change and eating meat. It referred to an imaginary grandma as ‘an environmental pig’ and warned we ‘will not let you get away with this’. WDR called it ‘satire’ in the face of a disgusted public reaction when it was clearly calculated. ‘Satire’ is the excuse often used when attempts at indoctrination become too blatant and people see through it. The ‘how dare you?’ rant about older generations by 16-year-old Cult puppet Thunberg was also an example of this theme. Yes, Greta, how dare older people and the long-gone create an industrial society that allows multimillion dollar yachts to be built for your propaganda stunts and aircraft to quietly – shhhhh – fly your sailing crew back home across the Atlantic while you posture your carbon self-purity? The Cult’s desire to start a war between young and old has many motivations. One is that older people were born long before the climate change hoax began and many can see through the manipulation and contradictions. They must be perceived by the young as the villains and the enemy to be vanquished rather than wisdom and experience worth listening to (Fig 281 ).

Increasing the hype

Figure 282: Why would the One-percent invite Greta Thunberg to berate them on climate change? This is why.

Figure 283: Same song-sheet, different singers.

Thunberg was invited again in 2020 to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, a 100 percent front for the One-percent and the Cult behind the climate change hoax and the creation of an Orwellian, AI-controlled, Orwellian global state (Fig 282 ). Why would these multi-billionaires invite a 16-year-old to castigate them at their own conference for the second year in a row and repeat the crap that ‘our world is still on fire’? This chapter alone has answered that question and they will drop her like a stone when she has served their purpose. She outrageously claimed that if we don’t do what she said we are not acting ‘as if you loved your children above all else’. She added that ‘we don’t want these things done in 2050, 2030, or even 2021 – we want this done now’. Who is this ‘we’? The One-percenters watching her speak at Davos for sure and certainly not the general public. Donald Trump appeared at the elite propaganda-fest to deliver a speech warning against believing the climate ‘prophets of doom’ in a clear reference to Thunberg sitting in the audience. He was, however, pretty much a lone voice. Instead we had another burst of baloney from Prince Charles who remember said in 2009 that we had twelve years to save the world from irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse (Fig 283 ). Charles travelled to Davos in a private jet and electric car to make a speech promoting the demands of the Climate Cult. In the less than two weeks before the speech Charles had flown four times in private jets and a helicopter with the aircraft flying a total of 16,000 miles at a cost to the UK taxpayer of $280,000. This is a man who has flown 125 miles in a helicopter to make a speech about the dangers of aircraft emissions. Without a hint of embarrassment he presented himself at Davos as an environmental champion and called for ‘eco-taxes’, a world economy with nature at its centre (while reducing CO2 that sustains nature), and new AI technologies – all from the Cult’s letter to Santa, or Satan. He of course championed ‘sustainability’ and proposed a transformation of the global economy justified by climate change that precisely reflected the Cult agenda. He said:

Now it is time to take it to the next level. In order to secure our future and to prosper we need to evolve our economic model.

Figure 284:The year by which the Cult wants its agenda pretty much in place.

So many deadlines for the end of the world through ‘runaway’ climate change have come and gone, but like all good cults they just keep announcing a new date when the last one passed without incident. The latest doomsday is around 2030 which is a highly significant date that turns up in many guises. It was mentioned yet again by Prince Charles in his Davos speech. Here are three other examples: When the latest date of ‘twelve years to save the planet’ was first announced that would take us to around 2030. The UN list of goals to save the planet from climate change by transforming global society into a centralised dictatorship is called Agenda 2030. The year given by Google executive Ray Kurzweil and other Silicon Valley technocrats for connecting the human brain to artificial intelligence is 2030 (Fig 284 ). Is this yet another coincidence? What do you think when AI is being promoted as an answer to climate change? The hoax has hog-tied almost every politician into some level of compliance. There are the majority who buy the lie and say ‘something must be done’ and the rest who may be somewhat or totally sceptical, but still feel they have to go along with the farce for electoral or reputational reasons. This is what happens once the Cult has decreed and implanted the ‘norm’. Even people who see through it are mostly too intimidated to say so.

Then there is the feeling that the orthodoxy wouldn’t be repeated so incessantly if there was nothing to it. Not every fact may be true, this mentality says, but there must be some basis of truth or why would everyone keep repeating the same claims? Well, when a disease is (genuinely) spreading – in this case a perceptual disease – does everyone get the same disease? Yes. Everyone in the establishment was repeating that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. Was there any truth to that whatsoever? No. Once people grasp that human-caused climate change and its alleged catastrophic consequences is a mega-scam – not some of it, all of it – the mist clears and the monumental deceit is in plain sight.

Wake up Wokers. You are being hypnotised, mesmerised and shafted and I care about that enough to take your abuse when freedom for the rest of your lives at stake.