New Wokers have been enslaved in software minds by those that encode the software with the required sense of reality. Codes go on being expanded into ever-greater extremes of ridiculous as they are literally guided through wave entanglement with Cult manipulation along the path to complete mental illness. Daily perceptual programming (‘education’) throughout their formative years has achieved this supported by their friends and peers affirming the programming that they have also been downloading. Major Internet information sources like YouTube algorithmically offer ‘recommendations’ that match their search history to discourage access to other information and opinions. New Woke students are described as ‘snowflakes’ over their demands for safe spaces where they can’t be subjected to other views (Fig 287 ). The cancel culture of de-platformed censorship achieves the same end of I am right never being subjected to challenge. I refer to the phenomenon as Generation Jelly although it’s not really a generation (Fig 288 ). Large numbers of young people don’t fall for it, but enough do and they are re-writing human society because they have the whole Cult-controlled system and establishment behind them. Demands for ‘safe spaces’ in colleges and universities are expressions of the fast-emerging monoculture myopia and the same with protests that ban or ‘de-platform’ speakers who have a different view (Fig 289 ). One commentator said: ‘Very often we New Wokers cancel people, destroy people, for saying what everyone thought until 24 hours ago.’ New Wokers become locked in an information bubble which becomes their perceptual Bubble. If all they see and hear is their own perceptual programming played back to them no wonder they are convinced at how right and all-knowing they are. We have the indoctrination of the New Woke belief and its imposition on the public by the New Woke Thought Police. The law is that no one must offend or upset those in the New Woke hierarchy of victimhood by saying anything New Woke does not agree with (Fig 290 ). This perfectly serves the Cult agenda of destroying freedom of speech. Meanwhile, if you attack or criticise people and beliefs that are not in the official victim hierarchy (like white men and Christianity) you can be as abusive and racist as you like and the ‘inclusive’, ‘anti-racist’, mob will cheer you on. We all know how stupendously extreme the protection of Woke ‘victims’ has become to destroy human language and discourse in line with Orwell’s Big Brother state. The breathtaking absurdity of PC ‘transgression’ is constantly plumbing still new depths of extremism and ludicrousness. Some are so crackers that even Wokers call them ‘microaggressions’ which are defined by Columbia University psychology professor Derald Wing Sue as ‘brief and everyday slights, insults, indignities and denigrating messages sent to people of colour by well-intentioned white people’. From what I have seen ‘all white people are privileged racist Nazis’ doesn’t seem to be listed as a ‘microaggression’ never mind a macro one. Maybe I missed that meeting. Anything connected to another culture is now ‘cultural appropriation’ and this includes wearing a sombrero sold to you by a Mexican in a tourist shop. The Mexican wants to sell it to you, but Wokers say you should not buy it because they are offended on the Mexicans’ behalf even when Mexicans are not offended. PC is the world of victimless invented ‘crimes’ in which those not affected dictate what people should be offended about (Fig 291 ). This gathers momentum the more the victim culture manipulates through repetition and intimidation and the more people become offended about more and more things that didn’t offend them before. Being offended by people demanding you are silenced doesn’t count. To be offended is to hand your power to that which offends you and this is Planet Cuckoo when being offended is simply a choice . You can choose not to be . There you go – sorted. The professionally offended should have followed me around for 30 years if they want to see what ridicule and abuse is like. Have I been offended? No . I choose not to be offended by anything – least of all by ridicule and abuse from bubble-wrap minds. There is no more profound confirmation of your balance and self-security than being able and willing to laugh at yourself which New Woke can’t do, so seriously does it take itself. I don’t understand the sequence of being offended when I don’t experience it. Someone says something you don’t like or agree with. Okay, and ? Have your say if you feel it’s necessary (it usually isn’t) and get on with your life. Why scramble your emotional state and wavefield state by the irrelevance of being offended ?

Methodical madness

Figure 292: I’m against everything!!!! (Image by Ben Garrision at Grrrgraphics.com .)

If we really cared about the wellbeing of children and young people we would not be protecting them from things they are told to be offended about. We would be encouraging them to be strong, sovereign, individuals who don’t give a shit, never mind take offence, at what anyone says to them or about them. New Wokeness is a virulent, contagious, psychological virus unless you are conscious beyond mind and the five senses. This is the reason we need to understand why New Wokers think and act as they do. They are prisoners of New Wokeness – a perceptual computer virus. Tim Hunt, a Nobel Prize-winning British biochemist, was vilified and had his career severely damaged for a so-called ‘misogynistic joke’ that turned out to be nothing like it was reported to be by a professionally-offended New Woker. What is said, or more to point meant , doesn’t matter. How New Woke perceives what is said, while permanently scanning the environment for potential offence, is all that matters for fast-asleep Wokers (Fig 292 ). A doctor in England praised a father for stepping in ‘manfully’ to bring his daughter for an appointment when his wife couldn’t make it, but the doctor and his hospital apologised after the family complained that ‘manfully’ was sexist (the father was a man). It apparently implied that ‘women are there to do the childcare’ and not men. The complainants are deeply sad people if they think saying ‘manfully’ to a man is a subject for complaint and all doctors seeing what happened will no longer be focusing fully on the medical problem of the patient. They will be carefully prepreparing every statement in their mind before delivering the words. All over the world in every walk of life this verbal tenterhooks and eggshell-interaction is being experienced and destroying natural discourse, driving wedges between people, and causing ongoing daily anxiety with concern about anything you say. This is again what the Cult requires and New Wokers deliver. Here are just a few of millions of examples of discourse contraction that keep people in a state of constant anxiety to avoid saying the ‘wrong’ thing:

Oxford University’s Equality and Diversity Unit tried to accuse people who avoid eye contact with others of ‘racist microaggression’; transgender campaigners condemn such phrases like ‘born a man’ or ‘born a woman’ as inaccurate and offensive; ‘biologically male’ and ‘biologically female’ are deemed ‘problematic’ by a US gay rights ‘media monitoring’ group; Suffolk County Council in the UK stopped using traditional ‘Cat’s eyes removed’ warning signs over fears that people thought real cats may have been killed to manufacture these reflective road safety devices; applause was banned by the National Union of Students’ Women’s Campaign over concerns that it could ‘trigger anxiety’ among nervous students with whooping and cheering also targeted. Instead people are told to ‘applaud’ with ‘jazz-hands’ which means waving your hands in the air silently like a bunch of prats; braided hairstyles on white people are ‘cultural appropriation’; the word ‘exotic’ is apparently ‘a major verbal microaggression’ with ‘nasty racial underpinnings’ (me neither); ‘Fat-liberation activists’ say the term ‘fat’ shames people ‘who might not fit the conventional beauty standards of our society’, but if you are fat and okay with that you can ‘reclaim’ the word as your ‘empowering identity’; a guide released by The New School, a private college in New York, said the size of chairs was deemed a microaggression against overweight people. I take it they mean chairs that are not big enough for fat arses; Lucy Delap, a lecturer in British history at Cambridge, says that words including ‘genius’, ‘brilliant’ or ‘flair’ should be discouraged as they carry ‘assumptions of gender inequality and also of class and ethnicity’. Ms Delap can at least be sure that no one will ever accuse her of being a genius; migrants entering a country illegally cannot be called ‘illegal’, but ‘all white people are racist Nazis’ is still okay; anyone who cooks and names their dish ‘Jamaican Stew’ or ‘Tunisian Rice’ while not being Jamaican or Tunisian is guilty of microaggressions in the form of ‘cultural appropriation’ which also includes any white woman wearing hoop earrings. People from Jamaica cooking an ‘English breakfast’ are fine, though. Phew; a student at Louisiana State University wrote that women styling their eyebrows to make them appear thicker (‘eyebrow culture’) is an example of ‘cultural appropriation’; ‘Mother’ is a no, no, because it offends transgender activists. The British Medical Association advised members that mothers-to-be should be referred to as ‘pregnant people’ to avoid offence and ‘celebrate diversity’ if not sanity; any term that includes the word ‘man’ is definitely a felony you sexist bastard; singer Ellie Goulding was accused of racism after tweeting a picture of herself wearing an Native American headdress – ‘Don’t mock a dying race, you insensitive and ignorant excuse of a person’ responded a Woker; referring to the United States as a ‘land of opportunity’ is a microaggression because it ‘asserts that race or gender does not play a role in life’s successes’; a lecturer at Harvard Law School was told by a student not to use the word ‘violate’ as in law violation on the grounds that it might trigger traumatic fears about rape; others said rape law should not be taught to protect law students from ‘distress’. These students are going to make super lawyers and judges then; Sussex University Students’ Union warned against using the pronouns ‘he’ and ‘she’ to avoid assumptions about identity. ‘They’ and ‘Them’ are said to be the correct, gender-neutral terms. It’s good that I don’t go there because I’d tell them to stick it up their arse. This phrase avoids microaggressions by the fact that everybody has one – but give them time; ‘Where are you from?’ or ‘Where were you born?’ could be racist microaggressions according to the University of California, Berkeley, as ‘a covert way to say you don’t belong here’; the Student Federation at the University of Ottawa banned yoga sessions. Apparently they were Western ‘cultural appropriation’ of a practice with its origins in Indian Hinduism and there were ‘cultural issues involved in the practice’ that related to ‘oppression, cultural genocide and diasporas due to colonialism and western supremacy’; Clemson University’s diversity training decrees that to be told to be ‘on time’ is a microaggression as ‘time may be considered fluid’ in some cultures; a ‘Seattle councilman’ (shouldn’t that be ‘person’?) expressed concern that hosing down human excrement on sidewalks might be insensitive ’because it brought back images of the use of hoses against civil-rights activists’.

STOP! STOP! Have mercy, please. Only a short while ago you would have been laughed into oblivion if you said any of these things would happen never mind that they would increasingly be the norm.

The dark side of ludicrous

It is easy just to shake the head, laugh and dismiss all this as monumental craziness with the usual ‘political correctness gone mad’ and not to see it as that relevant in the overall scheme of things. Oh, but it is. The tidal wave of insanity is transforming human society and discourse and rapidly re-writing the language in exactly the way that Orwell described in Nineteen Eighty-Four. Confirmation of the real intent comes with a $1.5 million grant by the US military to develop a device to allow AI to identify ‘microaggressions’. Why would the military with its focus on killing people be so concerned about people being upset by microaggressions? Well, of course, it wouldn’t. Behaviour modification is the motivation in all of this. The money is being handed to associate professors Christoph Riedl and Brooke Foucault Welles to embark on a three-year project to develop a microaggression sensor. My timbers would be shivered if it doesn’t already exist. Riedl said:

The vision that we have is that you would have a device, maybe something like Amazon Alexa, that sits on the table and observes the human team members while they are working on a problem, and supports them in various ways. One of the ways in which we think we can support that team is by ensuring equal inclusion of all team members.

Put another way: Modify behaviour and give AI an ever greater say in decision-making until it is making all the decisions. Now the reason for such military (Cult) interest becomes clear. We are heading down a dark and dangerous road and we have reached the point where the New Woke Independent in the UK published a parody article it believed to be real calling for hate laws to be imposed on comedians who tell the ‘wrong’ jokes. The article was submitted under a fake name and not checked out even though its real author, comedian Andrew Doyle, said the content was ‘clearly a hoax’. Doyle has become well known for his invented character of New Woker Titania McGrath through which he exposes New Woke extremism. The article was published suggesting comedians become subject to hate laws because it promoted the Independent’s own stance. New Woke tyranny is now so extreme that parody is dying in the face of real life. An example is the British feminist writer Vicky Spratt who said that men who are not willing to date Woke women was an ‘insidious’ trend that will inevitably lead to women being killed by terrorists. How do you make men go out with women they are not attracted to – state-enforced dating? How about a Western version of arranged marriages? A confirmation of the sinister nature of the New Woke mindset and its imposition came from Kyle Jurek, a ‘field organiser’ for the openly-socialist Bernie Sanders campaign to be US president. Jurek was caught on camera by the Project Veritas undercover journalism operation saying this about America under a Sanders New Woke government:

Germany had to spend billions re-educating their fucking people to not be Nazis … we’re probably going to have to do the same fucking thing here. That’s kind of what Bernie’s fucking like … ‘Hey, free education for everybody’, because we’re going to have to teach you not to be a fucking Nazi.