Another American TV network, ABC, had on its board of directors: Ray Adam,director of J.P. Morgan, Metropolitan Life (Morgan), and Morgan Guaranty Trust;Frank Cary, chairman of IBM, and director of J.P. Morgan and the Morgan GuarantyTrust; Donald C. Cook (CFR, Bil), general partner of Lazard Freres banking house;John T. Connor (CFR) of the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Gravath, Swaineand Moore, former Assistant Secretary of the Navy, US Secretary of Commerce,director of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), General Motors,and chairman of the J. Henry Schroder Bank and Schroders Inc, of London (see thefunding of Hitler); Thomas M. Macioce, director of Manufacturers Hanover Trust(Rothschild); George Jenkins, chairman of Metropolitan Life (Morgan) and Citibank(which has many Rothschild connections); Martin J. Schwab, director ofManufacturers Hanover (Rothschild); Alan Greenspan (CFR, TC, Bil), chairman ofthe Federal Reserve, director of J.P. Morgan, Morgan Guaranty Trust, HooverInstitution, Time magazine, and General Foods; Ulric Haynes Jr, director of the FordFoundation and Marine Midland Bank (owned by the Hong Kong and ShanghaiBank). Again, we see the same Rockefeller-Rothschild-Morgan line-up on the boardof the ABC network which, we are told, is independent of NBC. The ABC companywas taken over by Cities Communications, whose most prominent director isRobert Roosa (CFR, Bil), senior partner of Brown Brothers Harriman, which hasclose ties with the Bank of England. Roosa and David Rockefeller are credited withselecting Paul Volcker to chair the Federal Reserve Board.Which brings us to CBS, the third of the ‘independent’ networks. Its financialexpansion was supervised for a long time by Brown Brothers Harriman and itssenior partner, Prescott Bush who was a CBS director. CBS banks through theMorgan Guaranty Trust and reports of CBS connections with the CIA and BritishIntelligence are legion among New World Order researchers. Some know it as theConspiracy Brainwashing System. The CBS board included: William S. Paley(Comm 300), the chairman (for whom Prescott Bush personally organised themoney to buy the company); Harold Brown (CFR), executive director of theTrilateral Commission, and former Secretary of the Air Force and Defence; RoswellGilpatric (CFR, Bil), from the Kuhn, Loeb (Rothschild) law firm, Cravath, Swaine,and Moore, and former director of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York; Henry B.Schnacht, director of the Chase Manhattan Bank (Rockefeller/Rothschild), theCouncil on Foreign Relations, Brookings Institution, and Committee for EconomicDevelopment; Michel C. Bergerac, chairman of Revlon, and director ofManufacturers Hanover Bank (Rothschild); James D. Wolfensohn (CFR, TC, Bil),former head of J. Henry Schroder Bank, who has close links with the Rothschildsand the Rockefellers, (in 1995, Bill Clinton successfully nominated him to head theWorld Bank); Franklin A. Thomas (CFR), head of the Ford Foundation; Newton D.Minow (CFR), director of the Rand Corporation and, among many others, theDitchley Foundation, which is closely linked with the Tavistock Institute in Londonand the Bilderberg Group. People connected with research into how the publicmind reacts to events and information are on the board of a United States televisionnetwork? What? Again with CBS, we are looking at the same names at the helm, and all threenetworks are closely interlocked with the Council on Foreign Relations and theTrilateral Commission. How can it possibly be claimed that the three televisionnetworks in America, through which the overwhelming majority of Americans gettheir news, are independent? They are controlled or strongly influenced by thesame people! Look at the potential for recruiting only those producers, journalists,and editors who support your views and aims, and for sacking those who challengeyour interference in what is and isn’t shown. Look at the potential for selling acommon line on events and news stories to ensure the American people have noother explanations than those you want them to believe. In July 1995, ABC wasmerged with the Walt Disney empire and the giant Westinghouse Electric made itsmove to buy CBS. Two months later, Turner Broadcasting, the company behindCNN Television, announced plans to merge with Time Warner. The deal was struckbetween the Time Warner chairman, Gerald M. Levin (TC) and Ted Turner (Comm300), a leading supporter of the new global order. We have seen the history of TimeWarner in Chapter 12. The concentration of power gathers pace.The same familiar Elite control the three television networks and America’s mainnewspapers, like the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times.This is without even mentioning all the other media outlets and international newsagencies (like Reuters) which the Elite control and the agencies run by the majornewspapers which feed a common line to the smaller papers via the wire machinesand syndicated columnists. The mind manipulation possibilities this offers are justincredible. Scores of leading US journalists and editors are members of the Councilon Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission and they are covertly workingto that party line in their selection, dissection and presentation of news andinformation. Typical was a ‘report’ by the famous CBS News anchorman, WalterCronkite, into the wealth and power of the Rockefellers. He closed by saying that ifany family had to have as much power and money as the Rockefellers, it was agood thing it was the Rockefellers.7 Violin, anyone? I am grateful for the researchinto UK media ownership in the early 1990s by Colonel Barry Turner, which hepublished in 1992 as a paper entitled Control of the Communications Media andConditioning of the Public Mind. Much of the following information about namesand newspapers is thanks to his painstaking work. The leading ‘quality’ newspaperin the UK is the Daily Telegraph. This is owned through the Hollinger Group by theCanadian, Conrad Black. The group owns more than 200 newspapers andmagazines in the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Israel, and thegroup started life as a front company set up by the British intelligence as I explainedearlier. Conrad Black is a member of the elite Steering Committee of the BilderbergGroup, a Trilateralist, and a member of the Institute for Strategic Studies. The seniorinternational advisors to the Hollinger Group are Henry Kissinger (CFR, TC, Bil,RIIA, Comm 300) and Lord Carrington (TC, RIIA, Bil, Comm 300). Some membersof the Hollinger International Supervisory Board are Zbigniew Brzezinski (CFR, TC,Bil); Giovanni Agnelli (Bil, Black Nobility, Comm 300); David Brinkley (CFR), newscommentator with ABC News; Paul Volker (CFR, TC, Bil), the chairman of the Federal Reserve Board responsible for Reaganomics and Thatcherism; LordRothschild, chairman of Rothschild Holdings; and Lord Hanson, chairman ofHanson plc. On the board of The Daily Telegraph is Evelyn de Rothschild, chairmanof the N.M. Rothschild merchant bank. N.M. Rothschild are merchant bankers tothe Hollinger Group to complete the cosy relationship.A former editor-in-chief and board member at the Daily Telegraph is AndrewKnight, another member of the Bilderberg Group Steering Committee and theDitchley Foundation, and formerly of The Economist magazine (director, Evelyn deRothschild), a publication set up to press for an end to the Corn laws and promotethe principle of ‘free trade’. Knight moved on to become executive chairman ofRupert Murdoch’s News International which owns The Sun, The News Of The World,and The Times and Sunday Times. Murdoch owns newspapers, magazines, andtelevision networks that are estimated to have a potential audience of three billionpeople. That is without his interests in the film industry. He is now linking in with aglobal telephone and communications network, MCI, and has made a bid for partsof the vast Berlusconi media empire in Italy. According to The European newspaperhe is also planning to substantially increase his media interests across Europe.8 In afeature in The Spotlight newspaper headed: What is Murdoch Up To And Who IsBacking Him? the writer Dan McMahan linked the rise of this media mogul tonames like Harry Oppenheimer (South Africa, Anglo-American, De Beers), ArmandHammer (Occidental Petroleum), the Bronfman family (who are close to theHollinger Group and the Anti-Defamation League), and the Rothschilds.9 It is notthe front men we need to look at so much as who is behind them pulling theirstrings. It is they who make the money available and manipulate the politicians toallow great media takeovers and cartels to emerge. With unbelievable hypocrisy,Conrad Black’s Daily Telegraph said of Murdoch’s domain: This is a huge andpotentially dangerous concentration of media power…10 And the Telegraphowner’s empire is not?The controlled media can feed the same basic messages to the public andhypnotise the collective mind to accept them. And if the same messages are comingfrom apparently unconnected media outlets, it must be true because they are allsaying it. Just as we have a One Party political state, so we have a One Media StateIn the UK, you would think that the Murdoch Sun and the Independent or Guardianwere miles apart and offering different opinions. But if you analyse what they areall agreed on and the way they operate, none are vehicles for a radical alternative towhat we have. They actually say the same. They just say it differently. The leastradical newspaper in Britain is the one claimed to be most radical: The Guardian, thetome of the mindset I call the Robot Radicals. The founding editor of The Guardian’s’rival’, The Independent, was Andreas Whittam Smith. He was a member of theTrilateral Commission during his years at the top of that newspaper. The political’choice’ is an illusion and so is the media ‘choice’. Indeed the two are indivisible.When I started to have more and more success in making this suppressedinformation available to the public, the campaign to discredit me was stepped up. Iwas delighted in a way, because it proved I am twitching a few nerve ends among those who wish to control the human mind. The Jewish Chronicle, which parrotswords like freedom and truth, began to write outrageous misrepresentations ofwhat I am saying and doing. I was having conversations with the press officer ofthe Board of Deputies of British Jews – a lovely woman – who was speaking to oneDavid Icke, while she was reading about a very different David Icke in the JewishChronicle. Understandably she was confused. I wasn’t because what was happeningwas so predictable. The sight of a paper like the Chronicle posturing its moralitywhile lying through its teeth is not a pretty one.However, it was the Guardian, the daily house magazine of the Robot Radicalmindset, that I found most interesting. One of its reporters, a Paul Brown, arrived ata meeting in Glastonbury and built an article around one man who had not read mybooks, yet was handing out leaflets opposing them! The anti-Icke piece came from anewspaper which claims to represent freedom. Excuse me while I fall down,laughing hysterically. In the article were the (barely) one-dimensional cliches about’disciples’ and other childish nonsense, but nowhere was there a mention of theBilderberg Group and its RIIA, CFR, TC network which I had spent much of theevening talking about. But what is it the Illuminati Protocols say?All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions – aristocratic, republican,revolutionary, even anarchical – for so long, of course, as the constitution exists…Likethe Indian idol, Vishnu, they will have a hundred hands, and every one of them will havea finger on any one of the public opinions required. When a pulse quickens these handswill lead opinion in the direction of our aims, for an excited patient loses all power ofjudgement and easily yields to suggestion. Those fools who will think they are repeatingthe opinion of a newspaper of their own camp will be repeating our opinion or anyopinion that seems desirable for us. In the vain belief that they are following the organof their party, they will in fact follow the flag which we hang out for them.Protocol 12And most journalists, probably including Mr Brown, will not have a clue abouthow they are being used. Someone wrote to me who had read The Robots’ Rebellionand was a daily reader of The Guardian because he thought it had the integrity thatothers lacked. He was stunned to read Brown’s article, which he said was a grossmisrepresentation of what I am saying and doing. I thought I could trust TheGuardian he said. You can’t. You can’t trust any of them. It was the same with a’journalist’ called Rosemary Carpenter on the Daily Express. She was given access tothe information revealed in this book and yet she dismissed it without any checkingor research. Mind blowing. From where do the public get their information aboutpolitical parties at election time? The controlled media. If the media will notsupport you, or are vehemently against you, it is virtually impossible to be elected.If you are a politician looking to win or stay in power, you have to listen to what themedia is demanding. If you don’t, they will turn against you and even reveal someunpleasant information which they have long known about, but have kept underwraps while you were playing their game. When Rupert Murdoch began to make positive statements about the British Labour leader Tony Blair (Bil) following the’untimely’ and sudden death of his predecessor, John Smith, this was consideredhighly significant for Blair’s chances of becoming prime minister. The sad thing isthat it was significant.The media have to keep the banks and advertisers happy. That’s where thepower really lies. The Global Elite pyramid coordinates major advertisers intopressurising papers into following or not following, a particular line. Print thatand we withdraw our advertising is a powerful weapon. But, of course, we havethe media ‘watchdogs’ which are there to protect us from media abuse. Thechairman of the newspaper ‘watchdog’, the Press Complaints Commission, is LordWakeham, the former cabinet minister, who controversially went from governmentto the board of N.M. Rothschild. And while Lord Rees Mogg (Bil), the formereditor of The Times, was chairman of the television and radio ‘watchdog’, theBroadcasting Complaints Commission, he was also a Rothschilds’ director. SirZelman Cowan, another former chairman of the old complaints body, the PressCouncil, was involved in 1991 with the takeover of the Australian Fairfax Groupby Conrad Black’s Hollinger Group. Lord Armstrong, the former head of the CivilService and cabinet secretary (who went on to become a director of N.M.Rothschild) also joined the board of Carlton Television, which broadcasts toLondon and the ‘Independent’ television network in the UK. I could go on and onacross the UK media, revealing the interconnections between certain names andcompanies. Rest assured, however, there is really nothing to worry about. As thethen Home Secretary, Douglas Hurd, said in The Financial Times on January 19th1989: Broadcasting will not be run by tycoons. Phew, that’s a relief! I ratherprefer the opinion on the true state of affairs within the media of John Swinton, ajournalist on the New York Times, who is reported to have told his staff at hisretirement dinner:There is no such thing as a free press. You know it and I know it. There is not one ofyou who would dare to write his honest opinions. The business of the journalist is todestroy truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to fawn at the feet of Mammon, and tosell himself, his country, and his race, for his daily bread. We are tools and vassals ofrich men behind the scenes. We are jumping jacks; they pull the strings, we dance; ourtalents, our possibilities, and our lives are the property of these men. We areintellectual prostitutes.But here again, we come back to the same theme. The media is our creation. Itreflects the collective mind of humanity and if it did not, it could not survive andprosper as it does. We can debate which came first, the collective mind’s attitudes orthe programming of those attitudes, but if you read the average tabloid newspaperand then spend an hour in the average bar, you will see that the thought patterns ofthe paper and the people are largely the same. Vast numbers of people think and actlike a tabloid newspaper. They have allowed themselves to become tabloid thinkerswith tabloid minds. We now have tabloid radio and tabloid television, too, which follows from the success of the tabloid newspapers. They all want it short,incredibly superficial, and with each item full of either mockery, condemnation,instant judgements, the official line, and/or defence of the status quo. Oh yes, and ifyou can get lots of tits and bums in there at every opportunity, so much the better,because women are only here to lust after. Have I just described the content of atabloid newspaper or the content of a conversation you will hear in almost any barwhen ‘the lads’ get together? Both. And that’s the point. Those thought patterns inthe collective mind created the reality we call the media. Tabloid newspapers reflect,and program, the thoughts of great tracts of humanity in an ever-downward spiral.The more our thoughts are programmed, the more open we become to even moresevere programming. The media won’t change until the collective mind changesand that will result only from changes in individual thinking. We create our ownreality and the media is no different. Whatever dominates the thought patterns ofthe collective mind will be the physical reality. The members of the human race ingeneral want someone else to do their thinking for them, and they have allowedtheir minds to close to the point where they do not want to discuss anything thatisn’t superficial or full of mockery and instant judgements of others. Hence themedia we have today. We have thought that into existence, too. When we change, itwill change.Mass HypnosisThe media’s greatest effect on the human mind is not so much its detail, but themass hypnosis created by the same basic themes occurring over and over. Mostpeople don’t pick up detail from newspapers, let alone the broadcast media whereyou get one chance to hear something and there is no way you can go back and hearit again, let alone extract more detail from it. These themes include the criteria forhow we should judge ourselves and each other; for what is credible or incredible,sane or insane. This background bombardment of our subconscious with a common’party line’ of information plays a major part in the way the conscious andsubconscious sees itself and the world. As a result, we are allowing the sum total ofthe media to program our thought patterns and create our reality. I learned so muchabout this process when I was the focus of unbelievable national ridicule in theearly 1990s. Most of what the media said about me was 100% the opposite of what Iwas saying and writing, but the people overwhelmingly believed what the mediatold them and I was ridiculed by millions for things I wasn’t saying and didn’tbelieve. This is happening to other people every day. The mass hypnosis has alsoturned millions into spectators of the world, rather than participants. We allowothers to do, while we observe and sit in the stand, watching the few play the gamewhich decides the future of the human race…our human race. This is symbolisedby sport and the endless television soaps in which we are spectators of themanufactured lives of overwhelmingly cardboard, one-dimensional characters. Weoften live their lives instead of our own. I love sport and there are soaps that I enjoy,too, but the danger comes when that is all we have in our lives. As one of theIlluminati Protocols said in the 1800s: In order that the masses themselves may not guess what they are about we furtherdistract them with amusements, games, pastimes, passions, people’s palaces…Soonwe shall begin through the press to propose competitions in art, in sport of all kinds:these interests will finally distract their minds from questions in which we should findourselves compelled to oppose them. Growing more and more unaccustomed to reflectand form any opinions of their own, people will begin to talk in the same tone as we,because we alone shall be offering them new directions of thought…of course throughsuch persons as will not be suspected of solidarity with us.Protocol 13We think of hypnotism only in terms of a single person lying down on a couchand listening to the words of a hypnotist speaking softly into the ear. Or we maythink of the stage hypnotist who has a group of people doing silly things in front ofa guffawing audience. Some even demand that this should be banned because it isdangerous. These are obvious forms of hypnosis. But we don’t realise that we aresubtly being hypnotised and encouraged to do and think silly things every day ofour lives. Instead of lying on the couch listening to the soft words of the hypnotist,we sit in the chair listening to newsreaders, film stars, advertising voice overs, andsundry presenters. The messages pound our conscious and subconscious mind andwe are programmed to think the way the controllers who own the media, the banks,the drug companies, the armament companies, the oil companies, ad infinitum,want us to think. Is there anyone left reading this book who still believes that theidea of a global conspiracy with the tiny few controlling the vast majority is afantasy, and impossible? Surely not.The esoteric knowledge about the nature of the human psyche is used to greateffect. While those in the spiritual movement are laughed at for their explanationsof the human mind-spirit, this same knowledge is being used by the manipulatorsto covertly hypnotise us and program our subconscious. Doctor Wilson Bryan Key,a professor of journalism, made a study of these techniques and wrote three books,Media Sexploitation, The Clam Plate Orgy, and Subliminal Seduction. He discoveredthat millions of dollars are being spent by advertisers for the subliminal11programming of the subconscious manipulation and indoctrination of audiences.Dr Key revealed the existence of the Tachistoscope, a film projector with a highspeed shutter which flashes messages every five seconds for 1/3000th of a second.These messages could not be seen by the naked eye, but were absorbed by thesubconscious. The message would then filter down from the subconscious to theconscious level as a thought, desire, or opinion, which the person believes is theirown. Years ago, a flash-frame picture of a Coca-Cola bottle used to be inserted intoa cinema film just before the interval. The audience couldn’t see it, but theirsubconscious could. Sales of Coca-Cola during cinema intervals went upsignificantly.Through the 1950s and 60s the experimentation into this subliminal interactionwith the subconscious expanded rapidly. In 1962 and 1966, Doctor Hal C. Beckerpatented subliminal devices which increased the potential of such technology. He operated a successful weight reduction clinic in New Orleans using subliminalmessages directed at the subconscious and his anti-theft programme was operated indepartment stores in Canada and the United States. Messages which were inaudibleto the ear were broadcast across the stores, saying don’t steal. Thefts from thestores were reduced. In 1986, a more advanced security system emerged whichbroadcast its messages under piped music. A computer ensured that the sound ofthe message went up and down with the loudness of the music. These subliminalmessages have been shown to work. So what else are they being used for?Some years ago there was a furore in France when the picture of FrancoisMitterand was seen to flash into view on the opening titles to the news. This waswhen Mitterand was running for president. It was a mistake by the TV company,for sure. But what kind of mistake? An error in putting the flash picture in the titlesat all, or a mistake in leaving it in for too long, so that the conscious and as well asthe subconscious saw it? The potential for subliminal messages to affect theoutcome of elections and to direct the thinking of the mass population is simplyfantastic. If they can make more people buy bottles of Coca-Cola with thesetechniques, why can’t they make more people vote for the party and the candidatethey want? They can. Of course they can. And given what you have read up to now,do you think they would use that potential to manipulate the public mind or wouldthey refuse to do that because it was undemocratic? Once the technology and theknowledge is available, there is nothing that can’t be communicated to thesubconscious through this technique of mass hypnosis.Once more, we come back to the esoteric knowledge. The manipulators knowhow the psyche works and how it is possible to program responses without theconscious level of awareness knowing it is happening. The technology now existswhich can be set up near a television or radio transmitter and will send outmessages which lock into the wavelength of the television broadcast as a ‘carrierwave’, a carrier of the subliminal message. These subliminal messages are comingout of the television set without even the television station knowing it is happening.The messages can tell people how to vote, who they should love and who theyshould hate, what they should buy, and what they should think. Say you want tostart a riot. Send out subliminal messages to the area for a while, and then produceone or two agents provocateur and an event to focus anger. In no time you will havethe people, already primed subliminally, going absolutely crazy. Then you say youneed more power for the police and the military to ‘solve’ this ‘problem’.The television has become the greatest tool of mind manipulation and it startswith children only a few years old. Some researchers believe children are especiallysusceptible to this form of programming. Most people watch the television as ifmesmerised by the screen. Conversation is destroyed. Instead of talking to people,we are talked at by the television set. Our lives are conditioned by the themes andindoctrination pouring from the screen. We are told what is right and wrong, goodand bad, success and failure, in and out. It is our resident hypnotist in the corner ofthe room. Many people fall asleep in front of the television because their minds arebombarded to the point of overload by the incessant flow of opinions and information. What does a hypnotist do before he or she begins b make thosesubconscious suggestions? They put their clients into a state of elaxation, a dozyhalf-sleep, because that is when the conscious mind is quiet and the subconsciouscan be most effectively accessed. What better way, therefore, to program televisionviewers with subliminal messages than to have them half asleep in the chair. In fact,people could even be put into that state by the subliminal messages coming fromthe set. And what is the real effect of the computer games and virtual realitytechnology that turns some children into zombies? Virtual reality is a good namebecause the whole system is designed to encourage the human race to accept avirtual reality and call it life. Dr Wilson Bryan Key, the investigator of these matters,said that subliminal technology can so affect many people that they can beprogrammed to start eating and drinking too much, change their sexual habits, andembark on an almost endless list of other manifestations of extreme behaviour. Thesubconscious is programmed with thought patterns and it creates that physicalreality. These techniques are becoming more sophisticated and developed all thetime. Susan Bryce highlighted one development in her article in Exposure magazinein the June/July 1993 issue: