The same anti-Iran and anti-Iraq policy appeared in the March/April 1994 issue ofForeign Affairs, the magazine of the Council on Foreign Relations, of which Gingrichis said to be a proud member. Bill Clinton is also a member of the CFR and so ishis national security advisor, Anthony Lake, who called for the dual containmentof Iran and Iraq in the Foreign Affairs magazine. How nice to have such amazingagreement between ‘opponents’. On September 2nd 1994, Avonoam Bar-Yosef,writing in the prominent Israeli daily, Ma’Ariv, said that seven of the leadingmembers of Bill Clinton’s National Security Council were Jewish. The article,headlined The Jews who run Clinton’s Court, quoted the rabbi of the AdathYisrael synagogue, as saying: .. .for the first time in American history.. .the US hasno longer a government of Goyim Gentiles, but an administration in which theJews are full partners in decision making at all levels.Newt Gingrich’s wife, Marianne, is collecting $2,500 a month as vice-presidentfor business development for the Israel Export Development Company, which aimsto attract American businesses to a high tech business park in Israel. She first mether boss, David Yerushalmi, while on a tour of Israel sponsored by the Israellobbying group, the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee.54 Arne Christianson,a former official of the same American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, is now a toppolicy advisor to her husband, Newt Gingrich. The Bush and Clintonadministrations, as with Clinton and Gingrich, share many common threads and onanything that involves the New World Order agenda, they all vote the same way.They are also awash with members of the Council on Foreign Relations and theTrilateral Commission, the vehicles for the Rockefellers and the Elite to manipulatethe US and the world.The British One Party StateIn the United Kingdom, as elsewhere, there is a nexus of people and organisationswhich connect banking, business, and politics. We have government ministerslinked to companies and organisations which their legislation has affected. We havemembers of parliament taking bribes to ask questions in the House of Commons onbehalf of companies. We have them paid to ‘lobby’ for interest groups. We have former cabinet ministers walking out of government and into top posts. LordWakeham was the energy secretary who supervised the privatisation of the UK’sstate-owned electricity industry. The merchant bank, N.M. Rothschild, has made afortune from its work on government privatisations – including that of theelectricity industry and the coal industry, thanks to contracts agreed while LordWakeham was in charge at the energy department. When Lord Wakeham left thegovernment, he became a director of…N.M. Rothschild. Norman Lamont, theChancellor of the Exchequer, was sacked by Prime Minister John Major and becamea director of.. .N.M. Rothschild. Lamont worked for the Rothschilds before goinginto government, as did the Treasury Secretary, Anthony Nelson, and John Major’sformer Welsh Secretary, John Redwood, who unsuccessfully challenged him for theleadership in July 1995.The story of the Redwood challenge is very interesting. John Redwood, formerlyof All Souls College, Oxford, was ‘seconded’ from N.M. Rothschild to head theDowning Street policy unit of Margaret Thatcher, a role Lord Victor Rothschild, thepolitical manipulator and alleged spy, had enjoyed under the premiership ofEdward Heath (Conservative, Bil) and unofficially under Harold Wilson (Labour,Bil). Redwood’s policy unit was behind the orgy of privatisations of state utilitieswhich has handed control of essential public services to the banking elite. Thispolicy has made enormous sums of money for N.M. Rothschild. Redwood thenreturned to Rothschilds before becoming an MP via the safe Conservative seat ofWokingham in Berkshire. If a monkey stood for the Conservatives in Wokingham, itwould be elected. Once in parliament, he (Redwood, not the monkey) wasappointed to the Department of Trade and Industry at the time his originalprivatisation plans were being introduced.55 Now there’s a coincidence for you. Isn’tlife just amazing?In early June 1995, the Bilderberg Group met at Burgenstock in Switzerland.According to Spotlight sources,56 the Bilderberg elite decided that John Major wouldbe given a choice: get back into line and support a Federal Europe with a centralbank and a single currency or be removed from office. In that same month, Majorwas persuaded to resign as leader of the ruling Conservative Party and offerhimself for re-election. He said he was fed-up with the rumours of a challenge to hisleadership by MPs opposing further centralisation of power in Europe. Put up orshut up, was the message. The man who put up was John Redwood whopublicly opposed a federal Europe. His main supporter in the election was his N.M.Rothschild buddy, Norman Lamont, another man ‘opposing’ a centralised Europe.What was the outcome of this challenge, however? Redwood lost and Major usedthis as an opportunity to purge his cabinet of those arguing against a FederalEurope. More than that, a deal was probably done in which Major agreed to handover power to Michael Heseltine who favours a federal Europe. Major andHeseltine had a three-hour meeting on the day of the vote and after his ‘victory’,Major appointed Heseltine as Deputy Prime Minister at the head of a network ofpower. It may be that Heseltine was given the reins of government (under thecontrol of the Global Elite) and in return Major was assured of enough votes to survive as a figurehead, puppet prime minister. So who benefited by that challengefrom John Redwood and Norman Lamont, the two anti-federalists from N.M.Rothschild? Those who want to see a United States of Europe – the very thingRedwood said he stood to oppose. What another amazing coincidence then, that afew days before the Redwood ‘challenge’, we find among the guests at theBilderberg meeting in Switzerland the name.. .Norman Lamont. He went as aRothschild representative together with Emma Rothschild, Lord Victor Rothschild’sdaughter. Well, I never. Norman save our sovereignty Lamont attending ameeting of the organisation that has been behind the manipulation to create aFederal Europe for more than 40 years. The same meeting which decided that JohnMajor must come into line on Europe or be ousted. Norman, my old son, you havebeen rumbled.The Labour MP, Giles Radice, the chairman of the EuropeanMovement, would have seen Lamont at Burgenstock because Radice was also there.How strange he didn’t mention that while Stormin’ Norman was so publicly’opposing’ a federal Europe. Radice must have forgotten. Another Britishgovernment ‘name’ at Burgenstock was Lamont’s Conservative colleague WilliamWaldegrave, the then secretary of state for agriculture and a man implicated in thearms to Iraq scandal. Waldegrave has close connections with the Rothschilds andserved under Lord Victor Rothschild in Ted Heath’s Downing Street Policy unit(1971-73). Interestingly, James Goldsmith, the billionaire financier who formed apolitical party to oppose a European superstate, is a frontman for the House ofRothschild and a second cousin of Baron Edmund de Rothschild. He’s also a closefriend of George Bush. It is important to remember that the Elite seek to lead theorganisations both for and against what they desire, to ensure complete control ofthe debate and its outcome.Also on the board of N.M. Rothschild are Lord Armstrong (TC, Bil), the formerhead of the civil service and cabinet secretary during Margaret Thatcher’sprivatising mania. So are Sir Clive Whitmore, former permanent secretary at theHome Office; Sir Frank Cooper, former permanent secretary at the Ministry ofDefence; and Sir John Fairclough, former chief scientific adviser. N.M. Rothschildhas twenty-six non-executive directors on the board, several connected withgovernment. The company was involved in the privatisations of British Gas, BritishCoal, the electricity industry, the water industry, the Forestry Commission, and theRoyal Ordnance Factories. According to the Daily Telegraph of January 26th 1995, ithas developed the image of the government’s favourite bank in the light of itssuccess in being selected so often by a process independent of governmentdepartments, which chose the banks to advise the companies being privatised. SirMichael Richardson was vice chairman of N.M. Rothschild and chairman of theRothschild company, Smith New Court, when this privatisation work was beingwon during the Margaret Thatcher years. Sir Michael, a senior Freemason, is a closeassociate of Margaret Thatcher.We can always rely on the media to expose these matters, however. TheSundayTelegraph of January 29th 1995, ran an article justifying the Rothschild/Wakeham/government connections and saw nothing wrong with them. The SundayTelegraph, like The Daily Telegraph, is owned by the Bilderberger, Conrad Black, and on theboard of Telegraph Newspapers plc is Evelyn de Rothschild, the chairman of.. .N.M.Rothschild! The article failed to mention that. They must have forgotten, too. TheHouse of Commons Register of Members’ Interests revealed that 200 of the 243Conservative backbenchers during the Major government elected in 1992 held atotal of 276 paid directorships and 365 paid consultancies. The potential forcorruption is quite, quite, extraordinary. And when do they find time to representtheir voters? Maybe this is why virtually no MP or member of Congress actuallyread the detail of the GATT agreement before voting it into law! The same withrepresentatives throughout Europe who didn’t read the detail of the MaastrictAgreement on centralising power in a European Union before they voted in favour.And what of the Labour Party, that other wing of the One Party State? Theysupported both GATT and the Maastrict Agreement, as did the Liberal Democrats.Here we see modified Hegelianism again. Two ‘opposite’ forces, socialism andcapitalism, were brought into opposition by the Elite in the early years of thiscentury in Britain and they have fused into one force, which now differs only inwords, not deeds. There are certainly scores of unanswered questions relating toleaders and high ranking members of the Labour Party through this century.Doctor Kitty Little is a long time researcher into the corruption and infiltrationwithin the British Intelligence agencies. Her scientific career has included researchfor the Ministry of Aircraft Production during the Second World War followed bynine years at the Atomic Energy Research Establishment at Harwell. In hersubmission to the 1995 Nolan Committee on Standards in Public Life, she tells thestory of an attempt to recruit her to the Communist Party at Oxford University in1940. Oxford University, you will recall, was a bastion of the Milner Circle and theRound Table, particularly All Souls, New Chapel, and Balliol. The communists, shesaid, had gone underground by joining the university Labour Party and sheattended a meeting of a Labour Party study group in a room at University College.The main speaker at the meeting, who clearly believed he was among friends,began to reveal the plot to destabilise the United Kingdom and Commonwealth,ready for a Marxist takeover. She later realised that this was part of the plan tointroduce the global centralised control called the New World Order. The plot wasoutlined by the speaker at that Oxford meeting to destroy United Kingdom defences,engineer a Marxist takeover of Rhodesia and South Africa, and to use what becameknown as the European Community as a smokescreen to hide the changeover to acentralised, Marxist, rule of Europe. The plan was also to destroy Britishmanufacturing industry. He went on to describe how members of the politicalsection of this subversive organisation were going to infiltrate the British parliamentand civil service, some entering each of the political parties. Many would go into theright wing of the Labour Party, others to the left wing of the Conservatives.Eventually there would be a fusion into a new Centre party. He said that theBritish distrusted extremists and so posing as moderates occupying the centreground would allow them to dismiss their opponents as Right wing extremists.This subversive organisation did not have a name, he said, because that would make it harder for people to prove it existed. The speaker said that he had been chosen tobe the head of the political section of this organisation and he expected himself oneday to become the prime minister of the United Kingdom. All this was said in 1940and that man did indeed become prime minister.His name was Harold Wilson.Wilson was the British prime minister throughout the period between 1964 and1976, except for the four years between 1970-74 when the Conservative Party leader,Edward Heath, was in office. Harold Wilson and Ted Heath were both Bilderbergersand both close associates of Lord Victor Rothschild. Wilson took over the LabourParty leadership with the death of Bilderberger, Hugh Gaitskell, in 1963.Significantly, Gaitskell was not in favour of a federal Europe. His death was veryconvenient because Wilson became leader at an opportune time. ConservativePrime Minister, Harold Macmillan (Comm 300, RIIA), was driven from office by theProfumo spy scandal in the same year that Gaitskell died, opening the way for theBilderberger Sir Alec Douglas Hume (Lord Home) to take over the Premiership.Hume would later be a chairman of the Bilderberg Group and also served on theCommittee of 300. The following year Hume faced – and was defeated by – HaroldWilson, in the 1964 election. The political upheavals in Britain mirrored those in theUnited States where Lyndon Johnson became president in 1963 after the Kennedyassassination in which, in my view, Lord Victor Rothschild was involved.Dr Little says that when she made her story public, the Daily Express journalistand writer of intelligence ‘exposes’, Chapman Pincher, showed a copy of herallegations to Harold Wilson. He was issuing libel writs like confetti at the time, buthis only reaction to Dr Little was to say she had mistaken him for a Tom Wilson. Sheknew she had done nothing of the kind, but she checked the entire universityrecords and there was not even one T Wilson enrolled there in this century! Sheknew Wilson as an Economics Fellow at Oxford because it was he who researchedand compiled most of the Beveridge Report which created the welfare state and thesocial security system after the war. Beveridge, she says, was little more than afigurehead who put his name to it. On the surface, the report was admirable in manyways, but from the perspective of the 1990s it can perhaps be seen to have widerimplications. It created dependency and control while destroying opportunities forself-reliance and independence outside the Elite-controlled system. Now thatdependency has been created, the welfare state is being dismantled and what is leftis being handed over to ‘privatisation’ – the elite bankers in other words. This isleaving people at the mercy of some very unpleasant people and organisations.Should the underclass react violently to this, the Elite have another opportunity tointroduce harsher laws under problem-reaction-solution.Dr Little said in her submission to the Nolan Inquiry, that the intentions set outby the young Harold Wilson in Oxford were transmitted to Moscow and by the endof 1941 a double agent in the Kremlin had given the details to Britain’s MI5. Thiswas circulated to senior MI5 officers, but no action was taken. During this period, Kitty Little said, the senior subversive infiltrator within British Intelligence wasLord Victor Rothschild, the man who controlled the use of Regulation 18b duringthe war. He was also named in a 1994 book as the unidentified fifth man in theBurgess-Maclean-Philby-Blunt communist spy scandal, although his involvement incovert activities was far, far greater than claimed in that book.Dr Little has had access to sources at some very high levels over the last 50 years.She says that Lord Rothschild was not the fifth man in a KGB spy scandal.Instead, he was the spider at the centre of a web of infiltration and corruption. Hecontrolled the activities of Philby, Burgess, Maclean, Blunt and Guy Liddell, theacting head of MI5. She names another man in this circle as Tommy Harris, aboutwhom little is known, except that he was a good cook. Harris cooked meals for thegroup when they met regularly at his home. Maclean was not directly involvedwith them. His work at the Foreign Office was to feed geology reports to GuyRothschild in France who used them to control essential resources, especiallyuranium. According to Dr Little, the Rothschilds now control 80% of the world’suranium. This spider’s web of corruption within the British establishment was notabout spying for the Soviet Union. This is more camouflage. The aim was to furtherthe ambitions of the New World Order. Harold Wilson’s nameless subversiveorganisation had (has) three sections, the political (led by him), the economic, andthe ‘biological’. The head of the biological section was the overall controller. Untilhis death, that was Lord Victor Rothschild. Who is it today?Lord Rothschild helped to finance MI5 agent, Peter Wright, in the production,with Chapman Pincher, of the ‘expose’ book called Their Trade Is Treachery, whichnames the late MI5 chief, Sir Roger Hollis, as the fifth man and ‘clears’ LordRothschild. Later Rothschild arranged for Wright to produce another book, theinfamous Spycatcher, which also named Hollis. Margaret Thatcher’s vehementopposition to the book’s publication ensured it was a best seller around the worldand added to its credibility as an ‘expose’. Leading this opposition to Spycatcher onbehalf of the government was Lord Armstrong, the cabinet secretary to MargaretThatcher and friend of Rothschild. It was in a court hearing over Spycatcher thatLord Armstrong (Bil, TC) made his famous distinction between lying and beingeconomical with the truth. When he retired from government office, LordArmstrong became a director of.. .N.M. Rothschild. In a letter to the Speaker of theHouse of Commons on May 1st 1987, Dr Kitty Little says:Early in the war Wing Commander Arnold, then head of a section in MI5, had reason tothink that Rothschild was not to be trusted. He took steps to have the most sensitivematerial kept from him, but found Rothschild’s backers too powerful to do more thanthat. Later, when Sir Roger Hollis was Director-General, he asked Wing CommanderArnold for a detailed report of events from that era.When Wilson became leader of the Labour Party a very serious problem arose, since itwas the head of the political section of the subversive organisation who was in line tobecome the next Prime Minister. Shortly before his death, the late Sir Theobald Matthew, the then Director of Public Prosecutions, told me that he considered that heand the Director General of MI5 had almost sufficient legally admissible evidence toprosecute. Sir Theobald said that in his opinion when a Minister used his officialposition to take action to promote objectives of a criminal organisation…in a mannerthat would be criminal if he were acting as a private citizen, then those actions are stillcriminal. This is only logical, since Ministers are better placed than private citizens to doirreparable harm to the nation. Sir Theobald died while Wright organised a smearcampaign against Sir Roger Hollis and the Deputy Director-General, that was launchedwith the aid of Lord Rothschild and Philby. And so Wilson escaped prosecution.57It is astonishing how many people die at the most convenient times. Dr Littlesays that Lord Rothschild was actively seeking to discredit MI5 and after 1979ordered Peter Wright and Chapman Pincher to indulge in character assassinationand disinformation. It is notable that Spycatcher claimed an MI5 plot to destabilisethe Wilson Labour government in the period we are talking about. Could this not beyet another smokescreen to hide the truth that in fact MI5 was making legitimateinvestigations? Rothschild covertly collaborated with ‘socialist’ Harold Wilson (Bil)and worked openly with ‘Conservative’ Edward Heath (Bil, TC), who occupied 10Downing Street between them for eleven years.