Heath invited Rothschild to headhis government’s policy unit, the Central Policy Review Staff, and to select itspersonnel!58 One of Rothschild’s roles was to supervise British Intelligence and toreorganise the Foreign Office. I wonder if this included Group 13, the Foreign Officeassassination squad? Yes, the British Foreign Office has its own assassination squad.From this time the run down of Britain’s aircraft, shipbuilding, car, steel andmachine tool industries began to quicken – exactly as Wilson had predicted in 1940.And the man behind the plan under Wilson and Heath was Victor Rothschild whowas working towards a European superstate and the end of national sovereignty.During their periods in office, both Heath and Wilson made organisational changesto MI5. Wilson limited the techniques of investigation that were allowed, anddemanded to be told if any MPs were under investigation. Heath went further andplaced many other decision makers out of bounds for the security services andthe police. These two opponents had a number of things in common, including theirenthusiasm for the European Community. Edward Heath took Britain into Europeand is to this day a vehement campaigner for full integration into a centralisedEurope with a European central bank and currency. Wilson began the move tometrication in Britain, which is ending British forms of measurement and replacingthem with the European version. Dr Little says she was told that Heath and Wilsonwere friends when they first arrived at Oxford University in the 1930s. She says ofHarold Wilson’s sudden resignation little more than a year after winning the 1974General Election:I have every reason to think that before the end of 1975 they MI5 were within sightof having sufficient legally admissible evidence for a prosecution. Wilson resigned.Callaghan succeeded him as Prime Minister, and had the members of MI5 who had been carrying out the investigation of Wilson’s criminal activities removed, on thegrounds that they were ‘Right wing extremists’.59Jim Callaghan (Bil) has since kept abreast of foreign policy as a joint president ofthe Royal Institute of International Affairs. His fellow presidents are LordCarrington (TC, Bil, Comm 300) and Harold Wilson’s former chancellor and homesecretary, Lord (Roy) Jenkins (TC, Bil), who, with Lord (David) Owen (TC, Bil), BillRogers (Bil), and Shirley Williams, left the Labour Party in the early 1980s to form acentre party, the SDP, now the Liberal Democrats. All these people worked closelywith another prominent Labour government minister under Harold Wilson andJames Callaghan: the Bilderberger, Trilateralist, chairman of the IMF InterimCommittee, Committe of 300 member, and council member of the Royal Institute ofInternational Affairs, Denis Healey. I wonder if, when they were in the highestpolitical offices in the land, Wilson, Heath, Jenkins, and Healey ever got togetherand pondered on the remarkable twist of destiny that led four people who were atOxford University in the same period, to become the leading political names of the1960s and 1970s, just as the United Kingdom was committing itself to the EuropeanCommunity. Indeed Jenkins would go on to be president of the EuropeanCommission and Heath would take the UK into the community. Wilson (JesusCollege, University College), Healey (Balliol), Jenkins (Balliol), and Heath (Balliol)are such an inspiration to us all. Look what an Oxford education can do for you. Inthis same period, even the Liberal Party leaders did Oxford proud in the form of JoGrimond (Balliol, Bil), and Jeremy Thorpe (Trinity College), the author of the book,Europe: The Case For Going In. Later leaders of the Liberal Party (now the LiberalDemocrats), David Steel and Paddy Ashdown are also Bilderbergers and supportersof the European superstate. Once again, maybe all these connections are simply acoincidence, but you have every right to know they exist. It’s called democracy. Allthose members of the Bilderberg Group involved in the creation of, andmembership of, the European Community does challenge the idea of coincidence alittle though, don’t you think? But then, as George McGhee, a US ambassador toWest Germany and Bilderberg attendee said: the treaty of Rome, which broughtthe Common Market into being, was nurtured at Bilderberg meetings.60 Precisely.One other point about the findings of Kitty Little and similar researchers is thatof Rhodesia, the country named after its creator, Cecil Rhodes. It is now Zimbabwe.The new Constitution for Rhodesia replaced dictatorship by white rule withdictatorship by Robert Mugabe for the benefit of the Elite. It was agreed upon in theautumn of 1979 at a conference at Lancaster House in London, chaired by LordCarrington, who had taken over as foreign secretary from David Owen afterMargaret Thatcher’s election victory a few months earlier. The constitution waspresented to the assembled Rhodesian political leaders, black and white, byCarrington, who insisted on an answer by the end of the week. One man in theRhodesian delegation who would have seen the inherent flaws in this was JohnGiles, a constitutional expert. On Tuesday October 4th 1979, on the very day that theRhodesians were due to discuss the Carrington proposals, John Giles went missing and was later found dead. Dr Kitty Little was at Lancaster House that day to meetIan Smith, a friend of many years. She has been trying ever since to make thebackground to both the conference and the death of John Giles public. The previousday, Dr Little says, Giles had been to Hamley’s (the famous London toy shop) tobuy Christmas presents for his children. On the morning he disappeared he rang hiswife, sounding very cheerful and upbeat, but later that morning he was observedlooking suddenly very worried about something. In the afternoon, an official car, aGranada Ghia, came to pick him up. He was never seen alive again.While Lord Carrington’s proposals, in the absence of Giles, tied the Rhodesiandelegation in mental knots and won the day, the police were advised that Giles wasmissing. The next morning, John Giles was found dead on a path close to the rearentrance of Lancaster House. Verdict: Suicide. His death would not have beenmade public at all, unless an ambulance man had alerted the press. The coroner,who did not call policemen at the scene to give evidence, decided that Giles hadjumped from a first floor window at Lancaster House, which those who have beento the spot say was an impossibility, given where the body was found. And that’sanother thing. The Lancaster House staff used the service door of the building andwould have had to step over the body to get in and out. It was supposed to havelaid there through a whole afternoon, evening, and night. Yet it wasn’t found untilthe following morning.The case was handled by the local police and the authorities refused to discuss itwith the Rhodesian-Zimbabwe Special Branch. No police file exists on John Giles, Iunderstand. Kitty Little insists that Ken Flower, the head of the Rhodesian CentralIntelligence Organisation was, or had been, a member of Britain’s intelligencesection, MI6. She also says that it is now known that MI6 was working to destabiliseRhodesia in order to force the dictatorship swap that Lancaster House was reallydesigned to produce. According to Dr Kitty Little’s impeccable sources, Ken Flowermight qualify for the Guinness Book Of Records as the doublest of double agents!While head of Rhodesian Intelligence he was also working for MI6, the KGB, EastEuropean Intelligence, the CIA, and a number of African Intelligence networks. Heworked with the D group of MI6 operatives who, to quote Dr Little, did nastythings and had them blamed on Ian Smith. Zimbabwe is obviously very importantto the Elite and the multinational corporations, one of which, Rio Tinto Zinc, hadenjoyed the experience of having Lord Carrington on its board.There is considerable evidence to support Kitty Little’s contention. Two monthsafter the Lancaster House conference, it was revealed that Margaret Thatcher (Bil)and Lord Carrington (TC, Bil, RIIA, Comm 300) had ordered a massive surveillanceoperation on the delegates. Telephones were tapped, rooms bugged, diplomaticcommunications were monitored, and the British used Rhodesian security tointerpret the African language. This was revealed by reporter Barrie Penrose in theLondon Sunday Times of February 3rd 1980, under the headline, Minister’s Phonewas Tapped by Secret Services. This, said the article, was why Lord Carringtoncould conduct the conference on the basis of brinkmanship. The intelligence servicestold him what the brinks were. Which leads to another question: if the rooms and phones were bugged, why did they not know what had happened to John Giles untilhe was found dead the next morning? Ummm. Kitty Little contends that MargaretThatcher was kept in the dark by Carrington about a host of foreign policy subjectsand only selected information was allowed to reach her. This clearly would havecoloured her views of which policy to follow. It is emerging that for all her apparentpower, the Iron Lady was another puppet, perhaps even more than most.In the light of what Kitty Little says, it is interesting that (as I mentioned earlier) Iwas approached by the wife of a former official of the South African government,who said she had seen documents explaining how the Trilateral Commission hadordered Britain out of Rhodesia. Both foreign secretaries involved, Lord Carrington(Conservative) and David Owen (Labour) are connected to the TrilateralCommission. Carrington was a member and Owen would become one soon afterCarrington replaced him as foreign secretary.Since the sudden death of John Smith (TC, Bil), the ‘new’ Labour Party has cometo power under Prime Minister Tony Blair, an Elite chosen one, who was supportedby the establishment and Rupert Murdoch’s media empire. Gordon Brown, hisBilderberg Chancellor of the Exchequer, immediately conceded the government’sright to set interest rates to the Bank of England. The leadership of the three mainpolitical parties in the UK are agreed on almost all that matters to the New WorldOrder agenda, as they were in the days of Wilson, Heath and Jo Grimond/JeremyThorpe. When you look behind the words and camouflage, there is hardly a jot ofdifference between them on the way ahead – integration into the European Unionand a single currency and bank. They only differ, in public anyway, on thetimescale. On the fundamentals of economic policy it is hard to prise them apart.So what has been the effect of all this on a key ambition of the manipulators – thecreation of a Federal Europe with centralised control? While we’ve been having thisfarce of a debate over whether the UK should agree to a single currency and aEuropean Central Bank, the truth is that we are already committed to it. Thepoliticians involved know it too. They are just kidding you, laughing at youprobably. The UK Conservative Party claims (for public consumption only) tooppose the centralisation of power in Europe while Conservative members in theEuropean Parliament are also members of the alliance grouping known as theEuropean People’s Party, which openly calls for a United States of Europe. This isactually written in its constitution!61 One way the confidence trick has been hiddenis by increasing dramatically the numbers of laws being introduced at all levels ofgovernment, particularly in Europe. By the mid-1980s, the published lawsemanating from Brussels together with parliamentary legislation, Ministerial Rules,and Orders in Council, exceeded in just six months, the sum total of all lawsintroduced in Britain before 1900.62 This tidal wave of legislation is not an accident.It is there to ensure that millions of pages are voted into law without the lobbyfodder politicians, or even the government ministers, having time to read them, letalone assess what they really mean amid the calculated gobbledygook andambiguity. Another smokescreen is the belief that those who run the EuropeanUnion are stupid and incompetent. Not at the highest levels they’re not. Butter mountains and wine lakes may seem to be the result of incompetence, but whobenefited from these policies? The multinational corporations who were able toabsorb all the smaller farmers and producers put out of business by the surpluses.That was the idea. It all has to be done covertly because if the public knew what afederal Europe really means they would not agree to it. In 1947, a group ofConservatives and Liberals produced a document called Design For Europe and oneparagraph revealed their approach very clearly:Moreover – and it is as well to state this bluntly at the outset – no governmentdependent upon a democratic vote could possibly agree in advance to the sacrificewhich any adequate plan must involve. The people must be led slowly andunconsciously into the abandonment of their traditional economic defences…63Edward Heath was agreeing to the political union of Britain in Europe as early asApril 1962 when he was Lord Privy Seal. He told the Ministerial Council of theWestern European Union that, .. .you have decided that those who join theEconomic Communities as full members must also join the Political Union. I amsure that this was the right decision. (Command Paper 1720.) Meanwhile thepeople were being told that the Common Market was only a free trade zone. BeforeMr Heath (Bil) took Britain into Europe, he attended a meeting in Paris in October1972 to negotiate the conditions with the French President, Georges Pompidou (Bil),a former employee of Guy Rothschild. John Davies, Heath’s Secretary of State forIndustry, was at the meeting and told the Conservative Party’s Monday Club thatthe following had been agreed: UK technology would be merged with Europeanindustry. Britain had led research and development for more than 50 years and so itwas ‘only fair’ that someone else should have a turn – France. As Britain ran downher manufacturing industry, London would become the money market of Europe.Heath further agreed to run down sterling and abolish the monarchy.64 (The barrageof bad publicity that has destabilised the Royal family in recent years is designed todestroy the monarchy. Who has been tapping their ‘phone calls? The manipulators.Prince Charles and Princess Diana are being played off against each other by’advisors’. The target year for the end of the monarchy is 1999.) Edward Heath (Bil)and Sir Alec Douglas Hume (Bil) signed on behalf of the UK, a Treaty of Accessionto the Treaty of Rome and we were in the European spiders web.Also accepted by Mr Heath at the time of Britain’s entry and by Harold Wilsonand James Callaghan during the ‘renegotiation’ of British membership, was thatBritain would renounce her national sovereignty and become part of a federalEurope. Local government was reorganised to reshape the country in preparationfor this, and devolution of power to the regions of the UK is being promoted toprepare for the plan for a Europe of ‘regions’. These regions would be given limitedpowers akin to the county councils of today and they would be administered bythose who control the European superstate. The Maastricht Treaty on EuropeanUnion even uses the word municipal elections when it talks of national electionswithin Europe.65 Very appropriate, given the game plan. In 1980, the European Commission published their map of regions. Those which have been proposed inthe former Yugoslavia as a result of the war are virtually the same as those on thatmap. When the absence of ‘England’ on the map was questioned, Dr Little and hercolleagues were told that the national government would no longer be anadministrative unit. But while all this agreement was going on behind the scenesaround the time of British entry, Mr Heath was denying in public that there wouldbe any loss of sovereignty. The lack of interest in the people’s wishes reached a newlow when a document published by the European Assembly in February 1984 saidthat anyone who even voted in the June 1984 European elections, would be deemedto have supported the idea of European Union! Equally outrageous was that theMaastricht Treaty on European Union had not even been published at the time ofthe UK general election which Prime Minister John Major claimed had approvedthe document! Isn’t democracy just fantastic? We’re having elections now in whichonly the clairvoyant can make an informed choice. When Douglas Hurd, the thenforeign secretary, signed the Maastricht Treaty in February 1992, he committedBritain to a United States of Europe. He and the government will tell youdifferently. They will say there is a get-out clause which says:Unless the United Kingdom notifies the Council that it intends to move to the thirdstage political and monetary union, it shall be under no obligation to do so.What they don’t tell you is this Protocol was over-ruled by another on pageP/UP-UEM/en61, which has these paragraphs:The high contracting parties…declare the irreversible character of the Community’smovement to the third stage of Economic and Monetary Union by signing myemphasis the new Treaty provisions on Economic and Monetary Union.Therefore all Member states shall, whether they fulfil the necessary conditions for theadoption of a single currency or not, respect the will for the community to enter swiftlyinto the third stage, and therefore no Member state shall prevent the entry into thethird stage.Mr Hurd signed those provisions and therefore committed the UK to thoseterms. In other words, having lost the power of veto, the UK either accepts politicaland monetary union or pulls out of the show altogether. The public ‘debate’ is afraud. Mr Hurd, Mr Major, and the pro-Europe Chancellor, Kenneth Clarke (Bil)knows that. So does Tony Blair (Bil), an Elite chosen one and Paddy Ashdown(Bil). Mr Hurd was one of those who stood in the Conservative leadership electionafter Margaret Thatcher was removed, on the orders of the Bilderberg Group, forher opposition to political and monetary union. Mr Hurd, who recommendedHenry Kissinger for his knighthood, was well schooled in European affairs. He wasprivate secretary to Ted Heath (1968-70) when Heath was leader of the opposition,and was then appointed his political secretary (1970-74) after Heath became Prime Minister. Hurd was also a minister of state at the Foreign Office under LordCarrington in the run up to the Falklands War. One of the people who helped towhip up the atmosphere which led to the demise of Mrs Thatcher, was Sir Geoffrey(now Lord) Howe (Comm 300), a former president of the European Council ofMinisters. So what awaits us now, unless we get off our backsides very quickly? AEurope of regions controlled by the unelected European Commissioners and the sixmembers of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank who will havecontrol of the single currency and the reserves of each member ‘State’. These sixpeople, who will control the whole of the European Union, shall be appointedfrom among persons of recognised standing and professional experience inmonetary or banking matters. (Maastricht Treaty, Article 109a, page UPUEM/eu41.) In their eight years of guaranteed security of tenure, these super sixbankers of the Global Elite may not seek or take instructions from CommunityInstitutions.. .or any other body. The European dictatorship will be complete.That is what the One Party Staters have been working towards behind theirmasks of opposition. Their ambitions are almost fulfilled. Only you – we – canstop them.The Global One Party StateMeanwhile the wars, which achieve so much for the Elite, continue. When the truthabout the Iran-Iraq War, the Gulf War, and the Bosnian conflict comes out, as one dayit will, the trails will lead to some very famous people and some front line companies- especially those involved in armaments – in the United Kingdom, the UnitedStates, and other countries. Who armed Saddam Hussein? Britain and America did.Who armed the Iranians? Britain and American did. Who armed the Serbs in Bosnia?Britain and America did. The time will come when the proof will be overwhelmingthat this is the case and some leading armament companies and politicians are goingto face some serious questions. If you know more, please tell me.In an article in The Spotlight on December 19th 1994, writer Warren Hough,claims that Henry Kissinger was accused by French President, Francois Mitterand,of being the master manipulator of the Yugoslav conflict. The allegation is said tohave been made at a meeting of the European Security Conference in Budapest,Hungary. Warren Hough’s article continued:As part of their war plans, the Serb leaders spent millions of dollars on contracts andpayoffs in the US Wall Street sources say that most of these short-lived deals wereapparently set up to make money for Kissinger’s consulting firm, Kissinger Associates,founding director Lord Carrington, a ‘peace’ negotiator in the former Yugoslavia and fortwo of Kissinger’s cronies, Lawrence Eagleburger and Brent Scowcroft. This populistnewspaper, after reviewing confidential bank records in New York City, warned as earlyas 1992 that Eagleburger (a former secretary of state) and Scowcroft (White Housenational security director in the Bush administration) concealed a compromising ‘cashnexus’ to the Serbs while they were formulating supposedly impartial US positionstoward the warring ethnic factions of the former Yugoslavia.