The underlying theme of all you have read is the manipulation of the humanmind. You cannot control billions of people with tanks in the streets and soldiersat the door. You can only do it by divide and rule – and by programming the massconsciousness (public opinion) into believing that what you want to do is a goodidea or the only option.This is crucial to both understanding how the manipulation works and to thinkingon a more streetwise vibration which will make it far more difficult for us to bemisled. For example, say that you want to introduce cameras in the streets, an armedand more authoritarian police force, and the erosion of personal freedoms. You don’twant the public to oppose these policies, indeed you want them to demand that youintroduce them. What do you need for this to happen? More high profile, violentcrime, which creates enormous fear in the community. Achieve that and people willbe knocking on your door demanding that you put cameras in their streets and givemore guns and power to the police. Problem-reaction-solution. And what better wayto induce more crime than to create a society of ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ dependent onwelfare payments and then start dismantling the welfare state? You give people achoice of going without basic needs or of taking someone else’s money and property.And when they do the latter, the victims of the crime and the mass of people who seethe reports of the crime demand that “something must be done”.All aspects of society are being used to promote this mental coup d’etat. The’education’ system is not there to inform children and young people, it is there toindoctrinate them; the same with the media and advertising. The tax exemptfoundations coordinate the Elite’s ‘education’ policy in the United States schoolsand universities, and in the United Kingdom this is done, in part, by a secret cliqueknown as the All Souls Group. This meets three times a year at (most appropriately)Rhodes House at Oxford University. Such education policies are designed to turnout clones of the system and world government supporters, although theoverwhelming majority of people in the teaching profession will not realise this. I included in The Robots’ Rebellion an extract from a document found, apparentlyby accident, in 1986 called Silent Weapons For A Quiet War. Another version isreported to have been in the hands of US Naval Intelligence in 1969. It is a wonderfulexplanation of the technique of mass brainwashing. The version I have was foundinside an IBM photocopier bought at a second hand sale in America and it describesa policy of mass mind control. This lengthy and detailed document was dated 1979,but it outlines a policy that has been implemented since the 1950s. The documentsays that: “The quiet war was… declared by the international elite at a meeting heldin 1954”. The Bilderberg Group first met in 1954. It is likely that the methods laid outin the document will be inspired by the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations inLondon and its interconnecting offshoots. Here is a flavour of the content:“Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent weapon andgaining control of the public is to keep them undisciplined and ignorant of basicsystems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused, disorganised, anddistracted with matters of no real importance on the other hand.This is achieved by:1. disengaging their minds; sabotaging their mental activities; providing a low-qualityprogramme of public education in mathematics, systems design and economics,and discouraging technical creativity.2. engaging their emotions, increasing their self indulgence and their indulgence inemotional and physical activities by:a) unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional rape) byway of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media – especiallythe TV and the newspapers.b) giving them what they desire – in excess – “junk food for thought” – anddepriving them of what they really need.c) rewriting history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant creation, thusbeing able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly fabricatedoutside priorities.These preclude their interest in, and discovery of, the silent weapons of socialautomation technology. The general rule is that there is profit in confusion; the moreconfusion, the more profit. Therefore the best approach is to create problems and thenoffer solutions.In summary:Media: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social issues, andcaptivated by matters of no real importance.Schools: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real economics, real law,and real history.Entertainment: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level.Work: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on the farm with theother animals.” That doesn’t describe today’s world, does it? All the main aspects of the coupd’etat are there and we can see this strategy at work every day. When agovernment is planning to introduce legislation against a target group as part ofthe plan to enforce conformity and remove freedoms, the process of softening uppublic opinion against that target group begins months, sometimes years, beforethere is even a hint of new laws. The idea is to turn public opinion against thetarget group through propaganda and engineered events. When the legislation isfinally presented, the potential opposition is already either greatly reduced ordestroyed altogether. Take the example of the Criminal Justice Bill introduced bythe British government in 1994. It was a dreadful piece of work and a tremendousstrike against basic freedoms, but it sailed through Parliament with virtually allparty support. One of its many targets were the ‘travellers’, the groups of peoplewho live in mobile homes of many kinds and move between various placesthroughout the year. They have been dubbed ‘New Age’ travellers by the media.The travellers are not perfect – who is? – but it will be enlightening to look at howthey were treated. In the year to eighteen months before the Criminal Justice Billwas announced, you could hardly open a newspaper or watch the TV newswithout seeing a story which suggested that travellers were a ‘problem’ in need ofa ‘solution’. Police were stopping and harassing the traveller convoys as theymoved from site to site; councils were refusing to allow them to cross their borders;conflicts were breaking out between travellers and police as the anger andfrustration mounted. All was captured and broadcast on the main television newsbulletins. Agents provocateur connected to British Intelligence were in therestirring things up just as the cameras were on the spot, in the way such agenciesoperate all over the world.Once negative events and propaganda have been projected at public opinion, outgo the opinion-polling organisations with their clipboards. The people who ask thequestions on the street don’t know what they are involved in. They are just askingthe questions they are told and paid to ask. But opinion polls are not there tomeasure public opinion so the people can be given what they desire. They are thereto direct public opinion, often using loaded questions to attract the desired reply.Tell people that 80% of the population believe something and those of the sheep -baa, baa – mentality will quickly conform and believe the same. Eighty per cent ofpeople cannot be wrong, can they? Oh yes they can, if they have given their mindsaway. The other role of opinion polls is to check if the propaganda against a targetgroup is working. Once the opinion polls say that a sufficient majority now believethe target group is a problem and “something must be done”, the legislation (thesolution) is taken out of the file and put before Parliament. This approach hasanother advantage in that the potential political opposition, what little there is, fearsthe electoral consequences of opposing laws to ‘solve’ a ‘problem’ about which thepublic has now been programmed to believe that “something must be done”.Therefore highly controversial legislation like the Criminal Justice Bill (whichremoves basic freedoms) goes through Parliament and into law virtually on thenod. Once this Bill was making its way into law, suddenly all the “travellers are a problem” stories disappeared and at the time of this writing, have neverreappeared. They will only return when even more harsh legislation against them isbeing planned. Until then, public opinion will go on being softened up to acceptlegislation against other target groups on the Elite’s hit list and the public will go onreacting like robots in exactly the way required. Unless we choose to take control ofour own minds.Organisations like the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (and their brothersand sisters in the United States such as the Stanford Research Institute, and theRand Corporation) research into how people will react, individually andcollectively, to events, changes, and ‘buzz words’. It was Tavistock, according toresearch that I’ve read,1 which devised the policy of ‘future shocks’, the means bywhich the collective human mind is bombarded with so many changes, events, andcontradicting information that it overloads, switches off, and becomes subservient.This is happening all over the world today, most obviously in the United States andJapan, where the population is being given one event after the other to fill themwith fear and insecurity. The aim is to destabilise Japanese society and break itsresistance to fundamental change.Many of the so called ‘spontaneous’ trends that are taken on by the young areintroduced by these and other organisations and then hyped into a frenzy byadvertising and the controlled media. People talk about the “latest craze” and veryfew stop to ask, “Where did this start and who was behind it?” We hear about the”craze that’s sweeping America” and that’s all. The ‘Flower Power’ period of the1960s was hijacked and directed by this same mind manipulating force. The CIAand British Intelligence were experimenting with the effects of the drug LSD in the1950s, before it was unleashed on the market and destroyed any possibility ofsubstantial positive change emerging from that time. In 1953, the CIAcommandeered the entire supply of LSD from the Swiss manufacturers, Sandoz(which was owned by S.G. Warburg of London). Later they did the same with EliLilly when it began to produce LSD in the United States. People were so doped andduped that they thought LSD was a weapon of ‘freedom’. Some still do. I’m notsure the CIA and British Intelligence had that in mind, somehow.The Diversion TechniqueAll that I am talking about here comes under the heading of ‘diversion’. This is oneof the most effective of the mind manipulation weapons used against the humanpsyche. It takes many forms. If you are being held captive, one way to escape is tostart a diversion. It may be an argument or a fight among fellow prisoners. Once thetrouble starts, everyone’s attention, including that of the guards, focuses on theincident. This gives you the opportunity to slip away unseen. The bullfighter’stechnique is another obvious form of diversion as he focuses the attention of thebull on his cape, so allowing himself to avoid injury.In the world of propaganda and public mind manipulation, we are constantlybeing subjected to this. Accusations of anti-Semitism against New World Orderinvestigators is a classic example of diversion. You concentrate attention on the issue of the messenger’s alleged racism and divert attention from what he or she issaying about their research. We have the strategy of infiltrating ‘moderate’ wings ofpolitical parties while covertly following an extreme game plan. This is a diversionwhich stops extremists being identified while they, themselves, denounce theirlegitimate opposition as extremists. We hear from time to time of ‘revelations’ aboutintelligence agencies, but how many are real revelations and how many aresystematically leaked to divert people from what is really going on? An example:publish a book by a ‘spy’ who names certain people as foreign agents. Hype it upthrough your controlled media and get the government to vehemently oppose it, soadding to its credibility. Persuade people to accept that the names revealed by the’whistle-blower’ are correct and those who were really involved are in the clear. Ifyou want to introduce controversial legislation or a government is being forced toreveal unpleasant information about itself, then under the rules of diversion, thisshould be done on a day you know another major story is going to break. Thislessens the space and prominence given to what you say because of the massivemedia coverage of the other big story.On the day the British Home Secretary, Michael Howard, announced theintroduction of identity cards, the Loyalist Paramilitary groups in Northern Irelandannounced a ceasefire in line with the one agreed by the Republican IRA. Thisreduced by a tremendous amount, the coverage and reaction in the media toMichael Howard’s identity cards. I do not believe this was a coincidence, especiallysince the paramilitaries and the British government are in regular contact throughthe secret society network and other channels, no matter what they may saypublicly. Indeed, the secret communication between the IRA and their ‘enemy’, theBritish government, has been publicly exposed.The attempts to blame two Libyans for the bomb on Pan Am Flight 103 whichkilled 270 people at Lockerbie, Scotland, in December 1988 is another case ofdiversion. None of the evidence points to Libya. That is a convenient scapegoat tomove attention from what really happened and to undermine the Gaddafi regime.The evidence of independent studies and documentaries clearly points to otherMiddle East connections, the CIA, and other intelligence agencies. The Lockerbiecrash site was swarming with American agents, as locals and journalists havepointed out. Police surgeon, David Fieldhouse, said he issued death certificatesafter examining 59 bodies, but later he found that police records contained details ofonly 58 bodies.2 What happened to the missing body, no-one seems to know.