Hansen’s dire claims that day more than 30 years ago have not happened and it’s the same with long-time Cult asset Al Gore who became the global sales-pitcher for the Big Lie and has made a fortune from being so (Fig 262 ). Gore said in 2006: We have ten years to save the planet (big-time wrong); the Arctic will be ice-free by 2014 (big-time wrong); the Gulf Stream will slow down (it’s been speeding up); polar bears are in danger of becoming extinct (big-time wrong); sea levels will rise by 20 feet in the near future (big-time wrong). Read some of my other books and you’ll see the background to Gore who has a personal carbon footprint the size of Godzilla. He was a vice-president to Bill Clinton and you don’t get that job if you have any inclination whatsoever to tell the truth. The Cult controls the Nobel Peace Prize, which is why so many Cult-asset war-mongers and mass killers have been recipients, and it also dictates Oscar winners whenever that would promote the agenda. Gore, you will not be shocked to know, was handed both awards for lying about climate change and frightening the life out of whole generations of children and the young. Prince Charles said in 2009 that we had twelve years to save the world from irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse (big-time wrong) and with extraordinary idiocy he claimed that climate change was the ‘root cause’ of the Syrian conflict which was actually triggered by terrorists funded and armed by the United States and Gulf State allies like Saudi Arabia. Here are some other climate and environmental catastrophe warnings that turned out to be utter crap around the period that the annual Earth Day was established in 1970 :
Harvard biologist George Wald:
‘Civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.’
American biologist Paul Ehrlich:
‘The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.’
Peter Gunter, a North Texas State University professor:
‘Demographers agree almost unanimously see 97 percent of climate scientists agree on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions … By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.’
Then there was the climate temperature prediction in 1970 from ecologist Kenneth Watt:
‘The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years. If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.’
The threat to human existence went from an ice age to runaway super-heating in the blink of an eye. How could that happen? They just changed the propaganda. The lies are constant and apparently without end.
Make-it-up mythology
Figure 263: The Medieval Warm Period began around 1,000 years ago when temperatures were warmer than today without industrialisation. Then came the Little Ice Age when freezing temperatures were the winter norm which makes temperature comparisons between that period and now utterly irrelevant.
Figure 264: Depiction of the frozen-over River Thames during the Little Ice Age.
Figure 265: The correlation between solar activity measured by sunspots and Earth temperature. It is an obvious comparison and connection which the Climate Cult ignores because it destroys the narrative. The ‘Maunder Minimum’ corresponded with the coldest point of the Little Ice Age.
Figure 266: Another sunspot-Earth temperature chart.
We hear claims about the ‘hottest day ever recorded’ and even when you factor out manipulated data the key word is recorded . Many times this will be deleted in headlines to read ‘hottest day ever’. Some background before I make my point. The planet has been hotter for much of its life than it is today and there was the Medieval Warm Period that began around 1,000 years ago which eclipsed current temperatures when there were no factories or 4 x 4s or indeed any carbon producing vehicles at all (Fig 263 ). The warm period was also a time of abundance compared with cold periods. Grapes were grown for wine in the far north of England and even Scotland. There was, in short, no climate catastrophe. Temperatures began to cool and previous abundance disappeared in what is called the Little Ice Age between the 16th and 19th centuries (some say it started earlier). It was so cold in this period they held ice fairs on the River Thames in London which froze over every year. Some Christmas cards still depict the scenes (Fig 264 ). It was highly significant that during the Little Ice Age fantastic explosions of energy on the Sun known as sunspots, which indicate solar activity, all but disappeared. This is known as the sunspot ‘Maunder Minimum’ after the man who conducted the research studies (Fig 265 ). You don’t think there could be a connection between Sun activity and Earth temperature do you? There can’t be, surely, or the Climate Cult would mention the Sun sometimes instead of being utterly obsessed with carbon dioxide. Maybe they think it’s just a coincidence that when the Sun comes out it gets warmer; or perhaps they think that when solar energy projected at the Earth increases this couldn’t possibly affect our temperature (Fig 266 ). They are experts after all. Scientists at CERN recorded an extremely close correlation between Earth temperature and the penetration of cosmic rays into our atmosphere. Records of ‘the hottest day/year since records began’ started mostly as we were still coming out of the Little Ice Age and of course temperatures are going to be warmer now. What use is a comparison between an extremely cold period and one after that period ended? It’s a pointless comparison unless you are trying to mislead which they are. Why would the trough-snout scientists of the Climate Cult seek in leaked emails and documents to delete from the record the existence of the Medieval Warm Period and make it appear that today’s temperatures are ‘unprecedented’ and caused by the industrial era? To mislead, of course, and people mislead to hide the fact that they’re lying. Here are some other climate propaganda myths:
• The migrant crisis is caused by climate change lowering crop yields that force people to relocate in search of food: This has been alleged to explain why so many are heading out of Central America to the United States border and supports the Cult migration agenda which I have described. In fact, crop yields in Honduras, Costa Rica, Mexico, Panama, Ecuador, etc., have been consistently increasing.
• Climate change will empty the North American Great Lakes: This is shown to be without substance by all-time recorded high water levels and no downward trend over 100 years. These high volumes were reported with the question: ‘Why are water levels on the Great Lakes fluctuating so widely?’ How about through misrepresentation of the trend?
• Climate change will mean ever-greater extremes of weather such as tornadoes and hurricanes: Strong tornadoes and devastating landfall hurricanes have been steady in number or in decline in recent decades according to peer-reviewed scientific literature that says the same about droughts, floods, and other extreme weather events. The worldwide death rate caused by weather events has dropped more than 98 percent since the 1920s.
• Polar bears are heading for extinction as climate change makes their ice habitat disappear: Polar Bears became the poster children of the Climate Cult as a symbol for a terrifying future. Polar bear specialists like Dr Susan Crockford, former adjunct professor at the University of Victoria in Canada and a forensic zoologist, demolishes the official narrative in her book, The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened . Indeed she destroys the polar bear hoax so well that she lost her role at the university in what she described as ‘an academic hanging without a trial, conducted behind closed doors’. This is what happens when you challenge Climate Cult orthodoxy.
Figure 267:You can always bet on the BBC’s David Attenborough parroting (appropriately) the official narrative.
Figure 268: Yet another constant misrepresentation to promote CO2 as a pollutant.