“He who gains most advantage from a crimeis the one most likely to have committed it.”The Roman playwright, SenecaThe covert force which is responsible for all those apparently unconnectedeconomic events is also at large in the national and global political arena. Thehidden hand of the Elite and its pyramid of deception can be shown to be behind astream of officially unconnected political assassinations and scandals.For instance, what apparent link can there be between the assassination ofPresident John F. Kennedy in 1963, the Oklahoma bomb in 1995, the Vietnam War,and the drugs-for-arms operation during the Reagan-Bush administration in the1980s, known as Iran-Contra? What could be the connection between theassassinations of Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, the Watergate scandal whichbrought down Richard Nixon, the Bay of Pigs invasion against Castro’s Cuba in1961 which did much to discredit John F. Kennedy, the removal of MargaretThatcher as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom in 1990, and the suppression ofinformation about the UFO phenomenon which has been identified since the war?The answer is the Elite and the cult of the All-Seeing Eye.The same force has been behind all of these events and countless others which,on the surface and in the media, are not connected in any way. In this chapter, I’mgoing to show how these political assassinations and events were part of the sameongoing plan, which removes anyone who gets in the way, either by physical orcharacter assassination. Understanding this is important because one methodthrough which the human mind is diverted from seeing these connections is foreach event to be promoted as a ‘one-off. This is done by the Tone assassin/noconspiracy’ approach. The same strategy is used when each national civil war andrevolution is said to be confined only to that country, and not part of a worldrevolution instigating trouble across the planet toward a common end.The Vietnam WarSo many events and implications were triggered by the war in Vietnam. The UnitedStates embarked on that debacle, the public were told, to challenge the spread of’communism’. We have already seen that ‘communism’ was the creation of thesame Elite who publicly promote ‘capitalism’. There is, therefore, another reason behind a war that killed so many on both ‘sides’. Retired Air Force Colonel L.Fletcher Prouty was chief of special operations for the Joint Chiefs of Staff duringthe Kennedy years and he was directly in charge of the global system providingmilitary support for the covert activities of the CIA. He wrote a book called TheSecret Team and in the film, JFK, the character Colonel X was apparently based onProuty who advised the film-makers.1 On April 13th 1995, Prouty talked on RadioFree America about the background to the Vietnam War. He said that on January29th 1954, the CIA Director, Allen Dulles, secured approval during a meeting at theWhite House for the creation of an organisation called the Saigon Military Mission.The man selected to head this ‘Mission’ was the then Colonel Edward Lansdale,who had been working with the CIA to overthrow the government of the PhilippinePresident, Ramon Magsaysay. The idea was to move Lansdale to Vietnam to do thesame sort of work there. Vietnam at that time had been divided at the 17th parallelinto North and South Vietnam by something called the Geneva Agreement. Therewere to be elections and either Ho Chi Minh in the North or Ngo Dinh Diem in theSouth would be elected to rule over all of the country. That was the theory, anyway.The Elite wanted a war instead. This would provide massive profits for thebanks and arms companies (the same people), help to destabilise American society,create divide and rule in the Far East, and provide a cover for an enormous trade inhard drugs. Prouty said that to create the appearance of an enemy to justify a war,the Saigon Military Mission (Allen Dulles and the CIA) embarked on”psychological warfare” – terrorism. They moved more than a million Vietnamesefrom the North to the South between 1954 and 1955. American Navy transportscarried more than 657,000 of them and CIA airlines transported 300,000. Hundredsof thousands of others were persuaded to walk. These people had no food ormoney and they began to form into gangs of bandits to steal what they needed tosurvive. As this began to grow, the Americans who had purposely created theproblem, dubbed these bandit gangs “insurgency movements” from the North andthey were given the name the “Viet Cong”. Thus the ‘justification’ had been created(problem-reaction-solution) for the Vietnam War.Robert McNamara (CFR, TC, Bil), Kennedy’s defense secretary at the time ofVietnam, and later head of the World Bank, has now publicly confessed thatVietnam was a war that should never have been fought. He said that it was a warthat the United States could not win and never even tried to win. Indeed, he mighthave added that it was a war that was never officially declared. McNamara’smiddle name is “Strange” and it was an inspired choice given his immense recordof manipulation. He was the man behind the jungle clearances using the notoriousAgent Orange. Quite why he has chosen to ‘reveal all’ now is not clear. BothMcNamara and Prouty agree that President Kennedy wanted to withdraw fromVietnam and end the war. Prouty says that Kennedy approved a document calledNational Security Action Memorandum 263. This said that all US soldiers and otherpersonnel would be out of Vietnam by 1965. This followed a stream of meetingscalled by the president to discuss Vietnam, most of which are recorded in theGovernment Printing Office publication, Foreign Relations Of The United States 1961-1963 (Volume IV): Vietnam (August to December 1963). McNamara says thatKennedy also refused to endorse the introduction of US combat forces in Vietnam.The Elite, however, did not want the war over that quickly and after Kennedy wasassassinated in 1963 there was no withdrawal. According to McNamara, thesuccessor to Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, released false reports about a NorthVietnamese attack on US destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin. No such attack tookplace, McNamara says, but thanks to the unquestioning reporting of this ‘fact’ bythe media, it further “justifed” the escalation of the war.2 Throughout the 1960s,employees of the Morgan banking empire were officials in the military arms ofgovernment.On July 4th 1971, a group of young Americans gathered in Detroit, Michigan, toissue a formal indictment against a list of people they said were responsible for thecarnage called Vietnam. The men they named were: William E Buckley Jr; DanielEllsberg; Henry Kissinger; Henry Cabot Lodge; Robert McNamara; Andre Meyer;David Rockefeller; Nelson Rockefeller; Dean Rusk; Walt W. Rostow; and MaxwellD. Taylor. Those names abound with members of the Council on Foreign Relationsand the Bilderberg Group. To tell the full truth, that list needs to be very muchlonger. Vietnam was just another engineered human catastrophe. It happened onlybecause it was made to happen in pursuit of the New World Order. Yet if you recall,the boxer Muhammed Ali was jailed for the ‘crime’ of refusing to take part andAmerican men are still looked down upon for “avoiding the draft” to Vietnam.Being someone else’s cannon fodder makes you a ‘man’, does it? Others weretreated like lepers when they came back from Vietnam because of the wayAmerican ‘pride’ had been damaged by failing to win. My God. My God.John F KennedyPresident Kennedy’s alleged Tone assassin’, Lee Harvey Oswald, was an asset ofthe CIA who was set up to take the blame. He was the ‘patsy’, as they say inAmerica. Investigations by New Orleans District Attorney, Jim Garrison, showedthat Oswald could not possibly have been responsible. Anyway, as the cine filmtaken by onlooker Abraham Zapruder proves, Kennedy was killed by shots fromthe front of the car, not the back where Oswald is supposed to have been shootingfrom a book depository.3 The assassination was the work, not of one man, but of ahighly trained and coordinated squad of professionals. Oswald, who realised he’dbeen set up and was prepared to say so in court, was taken through a public placewhere the nightclub owner Jack Ruby killed him. Ruby himself later died veryconveniently or at least disappeared. The plan was complete. It was a lone assassinand the lone assassin was now dead. End of story. Long live President Johnson.District Attorney Jim Garrison, the man featured in the film, JFK, is still the onlyperson to have tried a suspect with the murder of the president. This was ClayShaw. Garrison’s case against Shaw was severely damaged by the intimidation andmurder of his main witnesses and Shaw was found not guilty. Later it becameknown that Shaw had been working for the CIA all along. Shaw was also a directorof Permindex, a Mossad front company which operated as an assassination bureau. Garrison established that witnesses to the assassination were threatened when theygave a version of events that did not match the official line. Many people who gaveevidence to the Warren Commission which ‘investigated’ the assassination said thattheir statements were altered in the report and in some cases their signatures wereforged on statements they did not make. There were so many obvious indications ofofficial murder and official cover-up. Kennedy’s body was rushed out of Dallas fora ‘post mortem’ in Washington, under military control. The pathologist wassurrounded by officials while the examination took place and he was told what tofind. The president’s brain, the examination of which would have shown thedirection of the bullets that killed him, went ‘missing’ and has never been found.Scores of other people who clearly knew something about the assassination went toan early death by car crash, shooting, or the Global Elite classic, the faked ‘suicide’.The events in Dallas, Texas, on that tragic day, November 22nd 1963, were an Elitecoup on the United States of America. It was so well done that very few evennoticed that a coup had indeed taken place.There has been endless speculation about who killed Kennedy. Was it the CIA?The Mafia? Who? As usual, much disinformation has been spread to confuse anddivert, but when you look at the pyramid nature of the manipulation, it probablyinvolved many different agencies who were controlled by the Elite. This way therecould be coordination between elements within the CIA, the FBI, the organisedcrime syndicate, the Dallas police department, the military, the ‘Justice’Department, the media, the incoming President Johnson, and many others.Freemasonry was certainly a thread in this, too. Near the site of the killing today isan obelisk monument to Freemasonry with the flame of Lucifer positioned on thetop. Mossad and the CIA were the prime agencies involved, I believe, right down tothe driver of Kennedy’s car, agent William Greer. The basic training of all drivers inintelligence agencies and security firms all over the world is: If you hear shots, yourright foot hits the floor, and you get the hell out of the area as fast as the car willmove. Greer stopped! Maybe he was a reincarnation of the guy who drove theArchduke Ferdinand.John and Bobby Kennedy were clearly bad news for the Elite for some reason,probably more than one. JFK’s was a Bilderberg Group presidency, as Carter’s wasa Trilateral Commission administration. Kennedy, as far as I know, was not aBilderberger, but many of his leading staff were. Dean Rusk, George W. Ball,McGeorge Bundy, Arthur Dean, Walter Roscow, George McGhee, RobertMcNamara, and Paul Nitze were all Bilderbergers. His assistant secretary andundersecretary of state, was… Averell Harriman, one of the main architects of theVietnam War. Kennedy had asked the Brown Brothers, Harriman partner, RobertLovett, to give him a list of possible candidates for his Cabinet! He also accepted theadvice of Nelson Rockefeller to appoint Dean Rusk as his secretary of state, a manhe had never even met.4 Rusk took leave of absence from his job as head of theRockefeller Foundation, to accept the job. Kennedy (CFR) also ‘chose’ DouglasDillon (CFR) to be secretary of the treasury. Dillon was a trustee of the RockefellerBrothers Fund. Rockefeller-connected place men have also held the treasury post under Eisenhower, Johnson, and probably every other president of modern times.It is worth looking at the Kennedy assassination in some detail because it offers asuperb example of the methods used by the Elite and the extent of their influenceon events. I am indebted in parts of this section to the brilliant book by MichaelCollins Piper called Final Judgement, The Missing Link In The JFK AssassinationConspiracy. John E Kennedy was the son of Joseph P. Kennedy, the US Ambassadorto London at the time that Tyler Kent was being jailed for revealing the shockingpre-war cables between Roosevelt and Churchill. Joe Kennedy was a sinistercharacter who operated in the criminal underworld and made a fortune out ofrunning booze during the prohibition era. He apparently had no love for Jewishpeople to say the least and he became a bitter enemy of Meyer Lansky, the head ofthe Organised Crime Syndicate. There were two main groups within organisedcrime, La Cosa Nostra, better known as the Italian Mafia, and the Jewish operationdubbed the “Kosher Nostra”. Lansky led the latter and, contrary to popular mythand media stories, it was he, not the Italians, who was the “boss of bosses” inorganised crime. Joe Kennedy’s bitter relationship with Lansky worsened stillfurther, it would appear, after Lansky’s men highjacked one of Kennedy’sconsignments of bootleg whisky from Ireland.5 According to the family of ChicagoMafia boss, Sam Giancana, the “Jewish Mafia” in Detroit, the so called Purple Gang,issued a contract on Joe Kennedy’s life for operating his liquor activities throughtheir territory. Kennedy, the Giancanas’ say, went to Chicago to plead for his lifewith the Mafia bosses and their influence saved him.6 This was the backgroundfrom whence emerged John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United States.When JFK turned his eyes to the presidency he had a number of hurdles toovercome, especially the Kennedys’ deep animosity with the Jewish lobby in the USand the Meyer Lansky Crime Syndicate. Kennedy needed the money and supportof both the Jewish lobby and organised crime if he was to have any chance ofwinning. In 1957, he further enraged Israel (the Rothschilds/Global Elite) and itsmassive network in the US when, as a young senator, he supported the demands byAlgeria for independence from France. Israel bitterly opposed this. But father JoeKennedy decided to swallow his pride and put aside his feelings to make sure hisson became president. According to DeWest Hooker, a New York entertainmentexecutive, he once approached Joe Kennedy with a business proposal to set up atelevision network independent of Jewish money and control. Hooker says of themeeting:“Joe admitted that when he was ambassador to England that he had been pro-Hitler.However, in Kennedy’s words, ‘we’ lost the war. By ‘we’ he didn’t mean the UnitedStates. When Kennedy said ‘we’, he meant the non Jews. Joe Kennedy believed that itwas the Jews who had won World War II.”Kennedy said: ‘I’ve done everything I can to fight the Jewish power over this country.I tried to stop World War II, but I failed. I’ve made all the money I need and now I’mpassing everything I’ve learned to my sons’. “I don’t go with the ‘loser’, Kennedy told me. ‘I’ve joined the “winners.” I’m going towork with the Jews. I’m teaching my boys the whole score and they’re going to work withthe Jews. I’m going to make Jack the first Irish Catholic President of the United Statesand if it means working with the Jews, so be it. I have sympathy with what you’re doingHooker’, Kennedy said ‘but I’m not going to do anything that will ruin Jack’s chances tobecome president’.”7Events certainly support Hooker’s claims. Joe Kennedy arranged for planted’news’ stories to appear claiming Nazi support for his son’s opponent, RichardNixon, and JFK began a series of meetings with the Jewish lobby, particularlyAbraham Feinberg, the president of the Israel Bond Organization who, unbeknownto Kennedy at the time, was raising private money for Israel’s secret nuclearprogramme headed by Victor Rothschild.8 Kennedy assured him that he would begood for Israel and the US Jewish lobby. Feinberg said of Kennedy: “My path topower was cooperation in terms of what they needed – campaign money”.9Feinberg apparently produced a donation of $500,000 from Jewish sources.Privately, however, Kennedy was appalled at what he was seeing. The newspapercolumnist, Charles L. Bartlett, said that Kennedy, a close friend, had driven over tosee him after the meeting with Feinberg and company. Bartlett said: “As anAmerican citizen he was outraged to have a Zionist Group come to him and say: