CHAPTER EIGHT

Why demonise the gas of life?

Belief can be manipulated. Only knowledge is dangerous – Frank Herbert

New Wokeness is a cult religion in every sense and its sub-section known as ‘human-caused climate change’ is most certainly so. Climate orthodoxy is a theology, a term which derives from two Greek words together meaning ‘the study of God’. In this case the ‘God’ is the Virtuous Self and the Devil is carbon dioxide (Fig 260 ).

Figure 260: The Climate Cult and its constituent parts like Extinction Rebellion are just another religion and tick every box. ‘Rebel for life’ means rebel for the One-percent. Like all religions the Climate Cult is a perception program to ensnare its followers. (Image Gareth Icke.)

Religions have an orthodoxy founded on unsupportable beliefs that include walking on water and virgin births and so does the Climate Cult. Religions label non-believers of these unsupportable beliefs as heretics and blasphemers and so does the Climate Cult. Religions have had inquisitions to demonise and silence such heretics and blasphemers and so does the Climate Cult. Religions dictate a narrative and tell followers to unquestioningly believe whatever it claims and so does the Climate Cult. Religions say that belief in the orthodoxy must be founded on faith and not facts and so does the Climate Cult. You must believe the crap spewed out by faith-based religions like Extinction Rebellion and the Climate Cult priesthood in the form of people like New York New Woke congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio Cortez or you are a ‘climate change denier’ (see heretics and blasphemers). Don’t question – believe . These methods are straight from the Cult manual for its ‘astroturf’ fake protest groups described by former CBS News investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson:

Hallmarks of astroturf include use of inflammatory language such as ‘crank’, ‘quack’, ‘nutty’, ‘lies,’ ‘paranoid’, ‘pseudo’, and ‘conspiracy’. Astroturfers often claim to debunk myths that aren’t myths at all. Use of the charged language test well. People hear something’s a myth, maybe they find it on Snopes, and they instantly declare themselves too smart to fall for it. But what if the whole notion of the myth is itself a myth, and you and Snopes fell for that? Beware when interests attack an issue by controversialising or attacking the people, personalities, and organisations surrounding it rather than addressing the facts. That could be astroturf.

And most of all astroturfers tend to reserve all of their public scepticism for those exposing wrongdoing rather than the wrongdoers. In other words, instead of questioning authority, they question those who question authority. You might start to see things a little more clearly. It’s like taking off your glasses, wiping them, and putting them back on, realising, for the first time, how foggy they’d been all along. I can’t resolve these issues, but I hope that I’ve given you some information that will at least motivate you to take off your glasses and wipe them, and become a wiser consumer of information in an increasingly artificial, paid-for reality.

Questioning those who question authority is at the very core of Climate Cult and New Woke propaganda in general and both are drowning in astroturf fronts because they are a means through which human society is being transformed into a global dictatorship by the Cult as we’ll see in following chapters. In this chapter I want to first unpick the truly mendacious climate change narrative.

Cult doctrine and its many faces

Here are some archetypal traits of a cult: Unquestioning submission to leaders of the cult and what they insist you believe; those beliefs are the only truth; control cult members through the constant repetition and indoctrination of this orthodoxy; invoke an ‘us’ against ‘them’ mentality and claim that any outside challenge is ‘persecution’; salvation through association with the cult – only we can save the world by everyone doing what we demand; group think with pressure by the group to conform and target any individual with doubts; if doubters persist shun or expel them so they don’t pollute the group-think with legitimate questions; avoid critical thinking and ignore blatant contradictions in the orthodoxy; often impose a cult form of clothing or uniform so a cult member can be recognised purely by what they wear or what they do with their hair. All of these traits can be observed with the Climate Cult which has been funded and manipulated into existence by billionaires like George Soros (again) and decades of climate change indoctrination in the schools and universities. This has led to great swathes of whole generations believing utter baloney because that’s all they’ve heard. Climate Cult theology is founded on one of the most powerful forms of perception control – repetition of the orthodoxy at the exclusion of other views, opinions and information. Even Princeton professors who don’t accept climate hoax theology after a lifetime of expertise in climate science and the effects of carbon dioxide have their YouTube videos tagged to a Wikipedia page promoting the official lies (which goes without saying when Wikipedia actually exists to promote official lies). I typed in key words for YouTube videos that questioned climate change doctrine and the Wikipedia page parroting that doctrine was at the top of even that list. What a con job by this Cult propaganda operation YouTube owned by Google.

The Climate Cult demands that people ‘listen to the science’ when the Cult is anti-science. It’s not interested in allowing all scientific opinion and research to be heard in a spirit of openness and balanced understanding. The aim as with all New Woke agendas is to silence opposition and block open debate which they know they would lose. George Soros, a member of the United Nations High Level Advisory Group on Climate Change Financing, funds a list of organisations seeking to silence ‘denial’ of climate change orthodoxy. These include Avaaz (‘Voice’) which has been described as ‘the globe’s largest and most powerful online activist network’. It was established in 2007 by two other Soros-funded groups, Res Publica and MoveOn.org . Avaaz claims to have 55 million members with campaign teams operating in 30 countries and presents itself as a global grassroots operation working in pursuit of ‘people-powered politics’. It campaigns in 15 languages with a ‘core team’ on six continents and this Soros-funded group is leading a campaign to have Google-owned YouTube ban all information and opinions challenging the official propaganda about human-caused climate change. Avaaz (‘Voice’) doesn’t want others to have one. We have also had a Soros-connected Democrat Congressional committee (New Woke political wing) demanding that Google-owned YouTube censor videos that contain ‘climate misinformation’ which means challenging the official narrative. Fascistic committee members wrote to Google CEO Sundar Pichai to urge that YouTube stop ‘driving millions of viewers to climate misinformation videos every single day’. The contempt for freedom is extraordinary, but it suits the Cult agenda perfectly. Avaaz claims that ‘climate denial = death’ which is only another way of saying that if you can’t win a debate – ban it. ‘Grassroots’ Avaaz has a long record of campaigning for items on the Cult wish-list. It has helped Iranian protestors demanding the removal of the country’s government that the Cult has long worked to remove; supported a no-fly zone for Libyan military aircraft which allowed America, Britain and NATO to bomb the country and its people shitless without challenge and delete Colonel Gadhafi; supported the US-instigated ‘civil uprising’ against Cult-target President Assad in Syria and this was reported to include training activists and delivering $1.5 million of Internet communication technology to protesters. Avaaz claims to ‘unite practical idealists‘ to make the world a better place when its support for Western (Cult) actions against Libya and Syria alone played a part in the human nightmare that followed in a frenzy of death and destruction of the innocent. All those countries were on the September, 2000, list of targets named by the ultra-Zionist Sabbatian-Frankist Project for the New American Century.

To those who trust Avaaz I would suggest a call to Naivety Anonymous. To those who trust George Soros I would say don’t waste a call – even they can’t help you. How could anyone if you believe that a man who has caused financial mayhem for whole populations by targeting their currencies for financial gain is funding ‘progressive’ ‘people-power’ groups from the kindness of his heart. The best of luck finding that, by the way. Soros has also funded groups behind the worldwide Friday school ‘climate strikes’ fronted by the Climate Cult’s Greta Thunberg who has copyrighted the terms ‘school strikes for climate’ and ‘Friday’s for future’. America’s Media Research Center, a non-profit conservative media watchdog, reported that at least 22 activist groups listed as partners in the Global Climate Strike received almost $25 million from Soros through his Open Society network between 2000 and 2017. They included Fund for Global Human Rights, Global Greengrants Fund, 350.org , Amnesty International, Avaaz, Color of Change and People’s Action. Has the penny dropped yet Green movement? Unfortunately probably not, but maybe it will when we get to why human-caused climate change is being hoaxed. A major funder of Extinction Rebellion is Sir Chris Hohn who heads one of the world’s biggest hedge funds valued at multiple billions. The UK Mail on Sunday revealed the fund’s investments in companies at the centre of environmental scandals. Everywhere the Climate Cult and New Woke have a remarkable ability to attract billionaire sponsorship and support. Amazon’s mega-billionaire Jeff Bezos announced in early 2020 that he would spend $10 billion on ‘fighting climate change’ by funding ‘scientists, activists and non-governmental organisations (see Soros) through a new ‘Bezos Earth Fund’. It was still more confirmation that human-caused climate change is a One-percent hoax. Bezos picked up the script and said the climate was changing faster than had been predicted. ‘Those predictions were bad but what is actually happening is dire’. Bloody yawn. He said that Amazon was ordering 100,000 electric delivery vehicles from Michigan-based, Amazon-invested Rivian, which again is straight from the Cult agenda. To underscore the power of programming hundreds of Amazon workers, who face losing their jobs to ‘climate-friendly’ (it’s not) AI, had protested that Bezos was not doing enough about climate change. Manipulate the serfs to demand that you do what you want to do anyway (it happens all the time). The Climate Cult works to silence the ever-growing list of scientists worldwide who can see that climate change orthodoxy is mendacious nonsense. They are demonised, targeted in the courts, denied access to the media, and their careers and income disappear. By contrast those self-proclaimed ‘scientists’ prepared to sing from the song-sheet (the ones Bezos will support) are constantly wheeled out by the Cult-owned media and can dip their snouts in an almost unlimited trough of protection money – money to protect the lies.

The cult (literally) of New Woke climate celebrity

Once belief in the orthodoxy is secured in the mainstream it becomes ‘cool’ to support that orthodoxy. If you are a virtue-signalling celebrity it’s a must to build your own image and support-base. New Woke is ‘in’ while not being New Woke can be the death knell for a career in the media, entertainment and comedy. It’s the same technique that controls scientists. Say what we want and you get a stack of money or tell your truth and we’ll destroy you. Do you want lots of likes on Facebook or a Twitter storm? As a result we have a lengthening list of celebrity arselickers proclaiming Climate Cult orthodoxy of ‘Thou Shalt not fly’ while heading in private jets to climate conferences and protests. In the case of virtue-signal world champions like actor Leonardo DiCaprio this involves taking private jets to receive climate protection awards. Celebrities are used by the Cult for their public platform to spread the message while almost every one of them won’t have a clue who is really pulling their strings and why. Britain’s Prince Harry and his American wife Meghan Markle constantly virtue-signal their climate change New Wokeness while being driven in limousines to private jets and telling others to reduce their ‘carbon footprint’. Isn’t that hypocrisy? No, no – I said you must reduce your footprint, not me . Harry’s contribution to saving the planet has been limited to the New Woke posturing of making a speech in bare feet. Put your shoes on, mate, or you’ll hurt your feet on the tarmac when you leave. The couple announced in January, 2020, they were ‘stepping down’ as ‘senior royals’ and heading for Canada. Part of this will involve super-Woke Markle being able to publicly promote her virtue-signalling super-Wokeness (including climate change theology) while Harry follows behind doing what he’s told and apologising for being a white male. New Wokers supported the move because the pair are New Woke while the now hijacked original Left would have been exposing their unearned privilege, opportunism and narcissism. Oh, how the Cult is going to exploit them both – and make them very rich – to promote the climate change and New Woke agenda. Their first big, big pay-day came with a ‘speech’ to the assembled mega-rich One-percent fake Woke at a JP Morgan Chase event in February, 2020, for which they were reported to be paid between $750,000 and $1 million. JP Morgan Chase is America’s biggest bank and the world’s sixth biggest with assets of $2.6 trillion. Here we have fake Wokers selling their souls to speak for big bucks to other fake Wokers with limitless pockets whose investments have done so much to devastate the environment and create widespread inequality and injustice. The hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness of these royals-on-the-make is chilling.

Figure 261: Sad, real sad.

The ‘royal’ couple, said they were seeking to become ‘financially independent’ which means exploiting their royal connections and privilege to make lots of money and freeing Markle from her royal restrictions to stay out of party politics. Now she can campaign for the New Woke agenda including all the demands of the Climate Cult which she and her husband appear to ignore at every turn. Prince Harry was caught on tape by two Russian pranksters thinking he was talking to Greta Thunberg. The result was toe-curling and absolute confirmation that he just repeats the climate hoax script word-for-word without a thought of his own. How Woke and aware Markle really is can be gleaned by her closeness to the Clintons, particularly Hillary, one of the most corrupt partnerships on Planet Earth. We can expect the royal private jet passengers to be even more vocal now in support of the Climate Cult and every last facet of New Woke while living their own life in the ‘privilege’ that New Woke claims to despise. The System will give them every support. American TV host Tucker Carlson accurately described celebrity climate New Wokeness as ‘the theology of the private jet class’. Meanwhile we are told that the rest of us will soon be flying in planes (as a stepping-stone to not flying at all) that fly together in V-shape formations like migrating birds to save fuel and CO2 emissions by reducing air resistance like racing cars that get close to the one in front. As someone who has experienced what happens to a plane when it gets too close to another and is twisted by the air turbulence I can’t wait. Swedish Climate Cult goddess Greta Thunberg has been used to promote the Swedish term ’flygskam’, or ‘flight shame’, to pressure people to stop flying (except the private jet class). The shame that Thunberg will feel when she realises the scale on which she has been manipulated does not bear thinking about (Fig 261 ). She and the Climate Cult have created a situation so crazy that the UK’s University of Derby introduced ‘climate anxiety classes’ for staff and students worried about the planet and the eco-system. The university said the classes are aimed at dealing with feelings of anger, guilt and grief and combatting their ‘sense of loss’. I mean – pinch me. One student said the ‘climate emergency’ made her feel she ‘isn’t going to have a future’. Oh, congratulations Greta and your handlers. Well done you. Dr Jamie Bird, university deputy head of health and social care research, said people suffer ‘climate grief’ when they see what they are losing. They are not losing anything except their bloody minds. Despite incessant public indoctrination great numbers of people can see through the garbage, but most are frightened to say so for fear of the backlash and consequences. Perhaps, however, we saw a turning point in 2019 when narcissistic, self-obsessed Extinction Rebellion protestors were pulled off the roofs of London Tube trains by commuters who just wanted to get home after a day’s work. They’d had enough and rightly so. We’ve all had enough.

Monumental mendacity

A key component of mass indoctrination is the sheer scale of deceit which the Nazis described in terms of the bigger the lie the more will believe it. Lie a little bit and you may get caught out on the basis that people are open to smaller-scale lies. What most resist are the ginormous super-whoppers pedalled by the Cult. Okay, people say, they might lie here and there to support climate change orthodoxy, but they wouldn’t lie about the whole shebang would they? Oh yes they would and they have and they are. They lie both about the individual components of the climate hoax and about the hoax in its entirety. I’ll explain why shortly. In fact, the entirety of the hoax is the totality of the individual hoaxes. The Cult seeks to protect this fact from exposure by silencing and demonising dissenters to ensure only one version is ever heard by most people. The foundation of the hoax is the ever-repeated claim that ‘the science is settled’ when it is absolutely not and becomes less so by the day. Pedro Sanchez, acting prime minister of Spain, reached still new levels of ridiculous when he said: ‘Only a handful of fanatics deny the evidence.’ He’s talking about an ever-increasing list of experts in their fields worldwide who are exposing climate change orthodoxy as the claptrap that it is. All Sanchez and almost every other politician will have heard is the official version ultimately emanating from the Cult through The Web and they repeat that orthodoxy as solid-gold unquestionable truth. This is what teachers and academics are doing with their daily indoctrination of the young to believe in climate change mendacity. You don’t want to indoctrinate the kids? Then find another job and we’ll replace you with someone who will. It’s the programmed programming the next generation of programmed. Once the orthodoxy is established as accepted reality political leaders and parties compete with each other (with a few exceptions) over who will do the most to ‘fight’ a problem that doesn’t exist. To question the climate change religion is political suicide especially on the New Woke ‘Left’ and those who have seen through the hoax zip their mouths as they seek election. The Cult knows that from the moment it secures official belief in the ‘conventional wisdom’ about any subject the dominoes will begin to fall right across society with all institutions making decisions and introducing laws on the basis of that flawed and manipulated ‘wisdom’. The climate change hoax is such a wonderful example. The official narrative is taught in the schools and universities, promoted by the mainstream media and infused into the law of the land while dissenters are silenced, abused and demonised. No wonder that narrative has become accepted ‘truth’ among those who don’t question. I am no supporter of Donald Trump for many reasons, but at least he has spoken out against climate orthodoxy while others cower or believe what they’re told.

In support of ‘the science is settled’ baloney we have the associated lie about 97 percent of climate scientists believing that humans are the main cause of climate change (a climate that is always changing and has been since the Earth was formed). I saw Jonathan Bartley, co-leader of the Green Party for England and Wales, parroting this deceitful figure on a BBC programme while he berated the BBC for allowing ‘climate deniers’ to appear. I was a national spokesman for the UK Greens for a short time in the 1980s when it still campaigned for freedom of speech and wider environmental issues before it was completely hijacked by New Woke. Even the establishment Wall Street Journal has debunked the 97 percent claim. When you track back to where it came from, and on what basis, this figure being cited as fact by those who wish to sell the orthodoxy is ludicrous. Al Gore just pulled the figure out of nowhere and subsequently the most quoted source is John Cook, ‘Climate Communication Fellow’ for the Global Change Institute at the University of Queensland who is not a climate scientist. He just promotes the official story. I have read many articles explaining how Cook examined 11,944 papers by climate scientists and found that 97 percent agreed that humans were the main cause of ‘warming’. This is not the case at all. In his own words Cook writes that 32.6 percent endorsed human-caused warming (though very few as the main cause) while 0.7 percent rejected that and 0.3 percent were uncertain. Now here’s the most important figure … 66.4 percent expressed no position . I see it claimed again and again by the Climate Cult and the media that 97 percent of climate scientists say humans are the main cause of climate change when even by Cook’s flawed methodology the figure refers only to those who expressed a view and not the scientists in totality. One study of Cook’s figures found that only 64 of the 11,944 papers – (0.5 percent ) – said humans are the main cause of global warming and nowhere was mentioned terms such as ‘crisis’ or ‘emergency’. Even if you apply this to the 3,974 papers that did express a view the figure of 64 pointing the finger at humans as the main culprit plays out as 1.6 percent . A later study of Cook’s source papers found that in fact only 41 of the 64 papers endorsed the view that humans are the main cause of warming. That’s 41 out of 11,944 . Where does the 97 percent of climate scientists agree come from? They made it up like they have made up virtually everything else. Science is about evidence not a show of bloody hands from song-sheet scientists with their nose in the climate trough and nor is it about fiddling temperature figures to support your case because the actual temperatures don’t do that. This has been exposed over and over and if you are telling the truth you don’t need to manipulate the data. How many people know that US Senator Timothy Wirth admitted they even manipulated the temperature of the room when NASA scientist James Hansen really kicked off the global warming scare at a Senate hearing in 1988? Wirth said:

… We … went in the night before and opened all the windows, I will admit, right? So that the air conditioning wasn’t working inside the room and so … when the hearing occurred there was not only bliss, which is television cameras in double figures, but it was really hot …

… So Hansen’s giving this testimony, you’ve got these television cameras back there heating up the room, and the air conditioning in the room didn’t appear to work. So it was sort of a perfect collection of events that happened that day, with the wonderful Jim Hansen, who was wiping his brow at the witness table and giving this remarkable testimony …

Senator Wirth also said:

Believe it or not, we called the Weather Bureau and found out what historically was the hottest day of the summer. Well, it was June 6 or June 9 or whatever it was, so we scheduled the hearing that day, and bingo: It was the hottest day on record in Washington, or close to it. It was stiflingly hot that summer. At the same time you had this drought all across the country, so the linkage between the Hansen hearing and the drought became very intense.

You can see that from the start the climate change hoax was not about facts, but manipulating perception to believe a fantasy.

You were saying?

Figure 262: Al Gore, the One-percent gofer to sell the lie.