Criminal sanctions are the most potent tools we have to mark out conduct that lies beyond all limits of toleration or none in the case of New Woke. Criminal conduct violates basic rights and destroys human security. We reserve the hard treatment of punishment for conduct that damages the things we hold most fundamentally valuable. Climate change is causing precisely such damage …

… I have proposed that international criminal law should be expanded to include a new criminal offence that I call postericide. It is committed by intentional or reckless conduct fit to bring about the extinction of humanity. Postericide is committed when humanity is put at risk of extinction by conduct performed either with the intention of making humanity go extinct, or with the knowledge that the conduct is fit to have this effect.

When a person knows that their conduct will impose an impermissible risk on another and acts anyway, they are reckless. It is in the domain of reckless conduct, making climate change worse, that we should look for postericidal conduct.

From this bizarre journey through what passes for McKinnon’s thought processes comes the demand that challenging climate hoax orthodoxy should be a criminal offence under international law. The fascistic nature of such a demand will not have penetrated her New Woke self-obsession. McKinnon published a book entitled The Ethics of Climate Governance – the ethics of global governance would be more like it. No wonder UNESCO promoted her article. By the way, surely Cambridge academic Patricia MacCormack must be guilty of McKinnon’s ‘postericide’ given that she says: ‘The only solution for climate change is letting the human race become extinct.’ Ah, no, you see MacCormack and McKinnon are both New Woke and believe in the climate change hoax and that is always a get out of jail card.

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore, an open-and-shut case of ‘postericidal conduct’, emphasises another deception in the climate change racket. The IPCC’s brief is not to investigate the causes of climate change, but only human causes. No wonder it basically ignores the Sun. It is specifically focused on alleged human causes because that’s the answer the Cult needs for its manipulation. If IPCC personnel found there was no significant human impact there would be no reason for its existence and they would lose their share of what the Climate Change Business Journal estimated to be $1.5 trillion a year even at the time of the UN Paris climate conference in 2015. It will be much more now. American writer Upton Sinclair said: ‘It is difficult for a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.’ This is another Cult technique to pressure its gofers to do and say what the Cult wants or lose their income. The IPCC outrageously claims to be dedicated to providing the world with objective, scientific information when its controlling core is a climate Mafioso. Scientist and engineer David Evans, a full-time or part-time consultant for eleven years to the Australian Greenhouse Office (now the Department of Climate Change), has a far more accurate assessment of what is a fantastic conspiracy to deceive. He said the theory of human-caused global warming was based ‘on a guess that was proved false by empirical evidence during the 1990s’, but most scientists wouldn’t say so when ‘the gravy train was too big, with too many jobs, industries, trading profits, political careers, and the possibility of world government and total control riding on the outcome’ (my emphasis). With that Evans hit the nail bang on the sweet spot. This is what the hoax of the human-caused ‘climate crisis’ is really all about. He said that ‘governments and their tame climate scientists now outrageously maintain the fiction that carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant’ when the evidence they are wrong was overwhelming.

Agenda 21/2030

These two interconnected UN ‘agendas’ are the major means through which the Cult is exploiting the climate change lie to impose its Hunger Games structure of global control. Agenda 21 was launched by Maurice Strong (the Rothschilds and Rockefellers) at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. Agenda 2030 was established by the UN General Assembly in 2015. Agenda 21 refers to centrally-controlling everything in the 21st century while Agenda 2030 is a series of 17 target ‘goals’ which, if implemented in the way planned, would achieve the global dictatorship demanded by Agenda 21. In short they are two versions of the same conspiracy. Agenda 21 has been accepted and promoted across the world right down into local councils. Check your council or state and see if they are implementing Agenda 21 and ‘sustainable development’. The latter might seem at first to be laudable. Why wouldn’t we want human activity to be ‘sustainable’ in the long term? BIG RED FLAG AND BRIGHT FLASHING LIGHTS: That’s not the United Nations or Cult definition of the word. To them it means the excuse to impose world dictatorship. These are the ‘sustainable development goals’ and headings of Agenda 2030:

1. No Poverty

2. Zero Hunger

3. Good Health and Well-being

4. Quality Education

5. Gender Equality

6. Clean Water and Sanitation

7. Affordable and Clean Energy

8. Decent Work and Economic Growth

9. Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

10. Reducing Inequality

11. Sustainable Cities and Communities

12. Responsible Consumption and Production

13. Climate Action

14. Life Below Water

15. Life On Land

16. Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions

17. Partnerships for the Goals

Once again these would appear to be supportable ambitions except that we are looking at a constantly-used Cult technique that tells people what they want to hear without revealing the real reason for what is planned. We should always filter claims to ‘care about humanity’ with the knowledge that those behind the UN are Death Cultists motivated by horrific intent. Why would practicing Satanists and paedophiles of the Cult with a pathological hatred for humans want those ‘goals’ to be achieved including no poverty or hunger? These are the controllers of global finance that have created poverty and hunger and use both as political tools. The Devil is not so much in the alleged ‘goals’; it is in the means to achieve them (or the illusion of achieving them more to the point). This is how Agenda 21 intends to do that as outlined in its own documents:

• End national sovereignty

• State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring ‘equity’

• The state to ‘define the role’ of business and financial resources

• Abolition of private property

• ‘Restructuring’ the family unit

• Children raised by the state

• People told what their job will be

• Major restrictions on movement

• Creation of ‘human settlement zones’

• Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they live

• Dumbing down education

• Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all the above

This is the very wish-list of the Cult that I have been exposing for more than 30 years and the US Green New Deal proposed by New Woke Democrat extremists is a political manifesto to implement Agenda 21/2030 as are similar versions of the ‘Deal’ around the world. This is what the UN Agendas and the Green New Deals really mean behind their Orwell-speak:

An end to national sovereignty:

I don’t really need to elaborate on this one after what I have said already about the plan to delete countries for a structure of world government, superstates and regions. Maps already exist for a regionalised Europe with countries eliminated and America is being regionalised by the Tiptoe technique through 500 regional councils in the 50 states called Councils of Governments (COGs) and Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs). The next stage, the Smart Region Initiative (SRI), was launched in Arizona in 2019 with a view to expansion across the country.

State planning and management of all land resources, ecosystems, deserts, forests, mountains, oceans and fresh water; agriculture; rural development; biotechnology; and ensuring ‘equity’:

This is the centralised control of everything that I have been warning about and it’s already happening with some American states even claiming ownership of rainwater that falls on private land.

The state to ‘define the role’ of business and financial resources:

This means the central control of all finance and business and the end of private enterprise not supported by the World State. The systematic targeting of small mom and pop businesses and much bigger ones with taxation and regulation is aimed at destroying them all eventually so that only giant Cult corporations answering to the Cult world government will control everything – see Amazon for a start and survey the world since the ‘virus’ lockdowns for the extraordinary acceleration of this goal. Global financial dictatorship is the role of the planned world central bank with the European Central Bank, World Bank and International Monetary Fund all Totalitarian Tiptoes to that end and the same with the cashless single global digital currency that I have been saying was coming since the early 1990s. This is today being implemented with the disappearance of cash (again accelerated by its insane demonisation as a source of ‘catching the virus’). The economic sales-pitch of ‘sustainable development’ includes an ‘end to poverty’ which really means a re-distribution of wealth to make the mega-rich even richer and Western middle and working classes seriously poorer. Another pledged goal of ‘eliminating hunger’ (as if the Cult cares) is to justify health-destroying genetically-modified crops requiring stupendous amounts of pesticides and herbicides to grow and the end of eating meat.

Abolition of private property:

This is the central control of all property (except for the elite) with rents so high that people are forced into the micro-’apartments’ that are now being built around the world. Calls for an end to private property ownership have now started in line with this plan. Young people are being prevented from entering the property market by sky-high prices, student debt and other financial suppression. Rockefeller family insider Dr Richard Day told those Pittsburgh paediatricians in 1969:

Privately-owned housing will become a thing of the past. The cost of housing and financing housing would gradually be made so high that most people couldn’t afford it … Young people would more and more become renters, particularly in apartments or condominiums.

People would not be able to buy homes and gradually more and more of the population would be forced into small apartments the micro-apartments. Small apartments which would not accommodate very many children.

The last point is part of a depopulation agenda and Day also indicated the control aspects of telling you where you are going to live:

Ultimately, people would be assigned where they would live and it would be common to have non-family members living with you. This by way of your not knowing just how far you could trust anybody. This would all be under the control of a central housing authority. Have this in mind … when they ask, ‘How many bedrooms in your house? How many bathrooms in your house? Do you have a finished game room?’ This information is personal and is of no national interest to government under our existing Constitution. But you’ll be asked those questions …

Dictating where people live is happening in the Cult blueprint for the world – China.

‘Restructuring’ the family unit

The end of the family is a constant theme of Cult-related documents and organisations. The deletion of ever more parental rights which are handed to state institutions like schools and social services is this aspect of the agenda unfolding in plain sight without the dots being connected. Remember how student debt campaigner Wayne Johnson said the loan crisis was leading to the ‘ever-increasing destruction of the fabric of America’ with people ‘not getting married, not having children’. It’s all calculated cause and effect.

Children raised by the state

This is obviously related to the end of the family and the longer term plan is for the end of even human procreation as I will be coming to. Fantastic numbers of children now being literally stolen from loving parents by social services through outrageous misrepresentation and lies in secret ‘family courts’ is this plan at work. Insider Aldous Huxley described the end of parenthood in his prophetic Brave New World .

People told what their job will be:

George Orwell wasn’t kidding in his portrayal of a Big Brother world in which every aspect of human life is dictated including work slavery.

Major restrictions on movement:

Why do you think Cult-serving and manipulated climate extremists are targeting flying and car use? Look at the effect on movement of the ‘pandemic’. This further explains the obsession with imposing autonomous vehicles in which the computer limits where you can go. Governments are banning the sale of petrol and diesel vehicles in favour of anything-but Green electric power because that is the stepping-stone to full-blown electric autonomous vehicles. ‘Saving the planet’ is only an excuse to advance this agenda. Britain is committed to banning new petrol and diesel vehicles from 2035 while others including Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands and Sweden go for 2030. The knock-on effect for employment in the auto-industry can be seen with predictions of massive job losses due to the nature of electric car production. Where do those people go? Did I mention the Hunger Games Society?

Creation of ‘human settlement zones’:

Translated from the Orwellian this means people being forced into tightly-packed mega-cities of round-the-clock surveillance and micro-apartments that I have described. Their code-name is ‘Smart Cities’ (once again see China). Tightly-packed teeming cities of human chaos and misery will also provide low-vibrational energy centres on which the Cult ‘gods’ can feed.

Mass resettlement as people are forced to vacate land where they live:

Another reference to what is now happening with the destruction of rural communities, businesses and job opportunities, removal of shops and banks, plus increased transport costs, to pressure people to head for the cities.

Dumbing down education:

This has already been achieved and is programming the mentality of New Wokeness in which ‘education’ is confused with indoctrination and downloading the Cult perception program is perceived as ‘knowing it all’. Ponder the following climate change excuse for ‘dumbing down education’ from the United Nations (again) Education, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO):

Generally, more highly educated people who have higher incomes can consume more resources than poorly educated people who tend to have lower incomes. In this case more education increases the threat to sustainability.

Are you getting it yet New Wokeness?

Mass global depopulation in pursuit of all of the above:

With the advent of the AI world humans are no longer required by the Cult in such numbers and even more so with the end of procreation. The plan for a mass cull of the global population appears in many Cult-related documents under terms like ‘population control’ and a ‘sustainable population’. There are many ways this is being done through the systematic undermining of immune systems through food, drink, vaccines and radiation fields, and this really becomes a cinch once human brains are connected to AI. Those you want to remove are just a press of a button away or the click of a mouse.

Figure 276: The Pied Piper of Stockholm.

The horrific multi-faceted agenda for humanity outlined here is being justified by the ‘climate emergency’ and an ‘existential threat’ to humanity which isn’t actually happening . We are looking at mass-hysteria which is defined as ‘mass psychogenic illness, collective hysteria, group hysteria, or collective obsessional behavior, which transmits collective illusions of threats, whether real or imaginary, through a population in society as a result of rumours and fear’. Mass hysteria is another example of wave entanglement with individual hysteria feeding the entangled collective to generate group hysteria. Pump-primers shout fire and the crowd starts running while others keep shouting fire ongoing in science, academia and media. Everybody’s shouting fire and so there must be a fire even if no one can see the smoke (see ‘virus’ hysteria). The term ‘hysteria’ is such a perfect description of what is happening that a panel of German linguists decided to ‘ban’ it in relation to climate change. They choose a new word or phrase to ‘ban’ every year and went for ‘climate hysteria’ on the grounds that it ‘defames climate protection efforts and the climate protection movement, and discredits important discussions about climate protection’. This is Orwell’s Newspeak which deletes words that allow the ‘wrong’ opinions to be articulated. The ‘panel’s’ other banned words and terms include ‘alternative facts’, ‘do-gooder’, ‘liar press’ and ‘welfare tourism’ (a description of migrants exploiting the welfare system). I’m sure you have no problem seeing the pattern. Another head-shaker is that those eventually sitting at the centre of the target for freedom-deletion are the very people demanding in organisations like Extinction Rebellion that their own mass slavery – and that of their children and grandchildren – is implemented while anyone arguing against that should be silenced (Fig 276 overleaf). I do not exaggerate when I say that great swathes of humanity are descending into mental illness although thank goodness far from everyone. Patrick Moore was right when he said of the green insanity movement: ‘I fear for the end of the enlightenment. I fear an intellectual Gulag with Greenpeace as my prison guards.’ That is exactly the plan, but it doesn’t have to be. The idea has been to indoctrinate the young through constant climate programming in schools and universities to ensure the Big Lie is so ingrained that they will accept and even demand the Cult agenda for total global control of every man, woman and child.

Heeere’s Greta (right on cue)

The Swedish 16-year-old Greta Thunberg was wheeled out specifically to rally the young to rebel against their elders in climate protests that insist freedom is deleted for the rest of their lives. I don’t say for a second that Thunberg knows this. She is a tragic puppet and her story connected to organisations pressing the Cult agenda while she won’t know there is a Cult never mind she is doing its bidding. She is, however, revealing in her arrogance ever-increasing signs of believing her own publicity and hype. Thunberg doesn’t seem to know much at all and only parrots a stream of mantras and platitudes such as ‘listen to the science’ when she has no idea what ‘the science’ is. She never expands on ‘the science’ and mainstream media sycophants never ask her. The ‘science is settled’ mantra is utter bullshit and leads to people who would otherwise question climate change orthodoxy to stay quiet in fear of being accused by climate propagandists of ‘denying the science’. The theme applies especially to those in the academic arena who have jobs to protect. What if the ‘science’ wasn’t ‘science’ at all? What if it’s only a script written by the Cult to which most of mainstream ‘science’ has long sold its soul? Well, it is. Greta Thunberg has been diagnosed with obsessive-compulsive disorder, autism and Asperger’s syndrome and been credited with mystical powers by her Climate Cult mother, Malena Ernman, a super-New Woke Swedish singer, while her father Svante Thunberg is a talent agent and managing director of a media company. Greta’s ‘powers’ are claimed to include the ability to see carbon dioxide with the naked eye and how it flows out of chimneys and changes the atmosphere. I kid you not. Does she see the plants grow bigger and stronger, too, when CO2 increases? What absurdity although perfect if you want to create a new religious icon. Exploiting a 16-year-old connects with the young and gives her a free-ride with the mainstream media despite the impact of her elite-orchestrated words and actions being global in nature and fundamental to the transformation of human society. By contrast German teenager Naomi Seibt who once bought the climate change lie and then spoke out after seeing through the hoax is treated rather differently. The girl dubbed the ‘anti-Greta Thunberg’ is highly articulate and well-researched which means she does not get invited to elite events. Instead she is presented through implication and association as some kind of white nationalist extremist and of course the ubiquitous ‘anti-Semitic’ by the usual suspects that include, as always, the ‘anti-establishment’ establishment-to-its-DNA London Guardian . I bet you’re in shock. We should have a live public debate between Thunberg and Seibt for all young people to watch. An Internet video reveals a code that Thunberg uses whenever she is questioned in the street about ‘the science’. She takes off her hat and immediately a minder steps in to whisk her away. She is watched over by unpleasant and aggressive plain clothes security guards sometimes outnumbering protestors with her in Sweden. These heavies will not let anyone with real questions anywhere near her. Who is paying for them? Who is financing the whole Thunberg phenomenon? Members and agents of the One-percent are certainly involved in the bankrolling of this most blatant of propaganda operations. I recommend the YouTube video Greta Thunberg Incorporated: The Exposé to see the arrogant, authoritarian thugs among her ‘security’.

Is anyone really so naive as to believe it’s a coincidence that a 16-year-old protesting alone in Sweden suddenly finds herself invited by the One-percent to speak at their elite World Economic Forum conference in Davos, Switzerland, and berate them about climate change? Or that she was given a platform to speak to the world at the Climate Cult-orchestrating United Nations? Or that she was sailed across the Atlantic to get to the UN in a ridiculous stunt by those connected to the Monaco royal family in a multi-million yacht that used to be called the Edmond de Rothschild – the man Maurice Strong said was the creator of the environmental movement? Or that a crew filming a high-profile documentary followed her from the time she was sitting ‘alone’ in her ‘spontaneous’ one-girl protest outside the Swedish parliament? Or that the person who ‘discovered by chance’ her ‘lone protest’ was public relations and financial expert Ingmar Rentzhog who has close connections to the Club of Rome that hatched the climate change hoax from the start? He claims to have come across Thunberg ‘by chance’ minutes after she started her first ‘school strike protest’ outside the Swedish parliament. I’m laughing already. Rentzhog trained with the Climate Reality Project led by climate change global propagandist Al Gore and founded the social media platform ‘We Don’t Have Time’ to promote the climate change narrative. Two months after Rentzhog ‘discovered’ Greta in 2018 the Club of Rome held a joint conference with Rentzhog and ‘We Don’t Have Time’. The person who encouraged Thunberg to start her ‘school strike’ and protest at the parliament was the head of Extinction Rebellion in Sweden who had said they needed a cute young face ‘to get help from young people to increase the pace of the transition to a sustainable society’.