Figure 293: Inclusivity is not enough because that’s not the Cult agenda.

Who decides what constitutes a ‘fucking Nazi’? They do. Those decisions are made by black and white minds that are blind to context or shades of grey. It is or it isn’t. You are or you’re not. You are an ‘us’ or a ‘them’. Tyranny was imposed by Orwell’s Big Brother’s police state in ways akin to the brutal and notorious Stasi secret police in communist East Germany which enforced the dictatorship and employed an army of spies among the population to inform on those who ‘transgressed’. PC censorship, surveillance cameras and fingerprint/eye-reading technology in schools and colleges are specifically designed to make Big Brother tyranny the ‘norm’ so the adults that children and students become will accept the same norms in global society. Today colleges have organisations under names like ‘diversity units’ that impose reeducation PC orthodoxy on students while encouraging, even paying, other students to spy on their friends and colleagues and report PC transgressions to the authorities. This includes reporting academics for being non-PC in lectures and their comments. Many have been fired or forced to step down for the mildest of statements and as they have gone those that remain are frozen in fear of transgressing in any way. Britain’s University of Sheffield announced plans to hire 20 of its own students to police language on campus that could be seen as ‘racist’ (opening your mouth is enough). They are being paid £9.34 an hour as ‘race equality champions’ to seek out microaggressions which it defines as ‘comments or actions that might be unintentional, but which can cause offence to a minority group’. What about offence to a majority group? Oh, no, that doesn’t matter. It’s not about equality and inclusivity – exclusivity is what New Woke is after (Fig 293 ). Sheffield vice-chancellor Koen Lamberts, who will not have enough self-awareness to see that his policy mimics Stasi-like political tyrannies, said the initiative sought to ‘change the way people think about racism’. More like simply changing the way people think as in East Germany, the Soviet Union, North Korea and China. Among the university’s targeted microaggressions is anyone asking why everything has to be a race issue and why people are searching for things to be offended about. Impose your tyranny and then make it an offence to question the tyranny. Another microaggression that must be stamped out apparently is ‘being compared to black celebrities that I look nothing like’. I wonder when such people plan to grow up? Not soon, I’ll wager.

The tyranny of ‘I am right’

If New Wokers believe themselves to be all-knowing then everyone who disagrees with them must by definition be wrong or motivated by racial and sexual bias or other dark motives. The only right becomes I am right – there is no other possibility. New Wokers despise for this reason freedom of speech for those with different ‘wrong’ views. If I am right then it follows that those who disagree with me are wrong and what is the point of freedom of speech for those that are wrong especially when humanity faces the existential threat from climate change and mortal dangers from rampant racism and sexism? Freedom of speech must be deleted to protect our freedom. It’s so obvious and given that I am right it must be true. These attitudes have both been downloaded from a multitude of Cult sources and been further ingrained through the encouragement of narcissism and a sense of entitlement where me, me, me is the only show in town. These are some officially-recognised traits in what is termed narcissistic personality disorder. Observe the behaviour of extreme New Wokers and you’ll see the stupendous correlation:

• An exaggerated sense of self-importance (I am right) .

• A sense of entitlement (I am right and what I say must be acted upon).

• Require constant, excessive admiration (I am right and you must recognise that and look up to me as your moral and intellectual superior).

• Expect to be recognised as superior even without achievements that warrant it (I am right and what I say requires no factual basis. I am right is enough).

• Exaggerate achievements and talents (I am right because I am all• knowing).

• Believe they are superior and can only associate with equally special people (We are right ).

• Monopolise conversations and belittle or look down on people they perceive as inferior (I am right and if you disagree with me you must be inferior).

• Expect special favours and unquestioning compliance with their expectations (I am right and you must do what I say – see Greta Thunberg).

• Take advantage of others to get what they want (I am right and so what I am right about must be enforced even if it means crushing people).

• An inability or unwillingness to recognize the needs and feelings of others (I am right and if you challenge that fact we will target you with abuse, demonisation, a Twitter storm and efforts to get you fired and destroy your life and your family’s life).

• Behave in an arrogant or haughty manner, coming across as conceited, boastful and pretentious (I am right , er, that’s it).

• Become impatient or angry when they don’t receive special treatment (I am right and you must dismantle the industrial system immediately no matter what the consequences because I say so ).

• Significant interpersonal problems and easily feeling slighted (I am right and you say I’m not??).

• React with rage or contempt and try to belittle the other person to make themselves appear superior (I am right you moron).

• Difficulty regulating emotions and behavior (I am right and I get sooo angry when others say something different – they must be de-platformed. Silence them! ).

• Experience major problems dealing with stress (I am right and I get so stressed when people won’t accept that).

• Have secret feelings of insecurity and vulnerability (I am right and I won’t have that questioned with facts in case you prove that I’m not).

Narcissistic and insecure and vulnerable? What a psychological combination. Narcissism is indeed a cover for insecurity. I feel so sad for them and how they have been perceptually and emotionally abused. Life behind the New Woke facade must be a psychological nightmare.

Save us from everything

Figure 294: New Woke’s permanent state.

New Wokers are now indeed so vulnerable that they demand ‘trigger warnings’ to warn them of anything upcoming in lectures or exams that might upset them. The ‘anything’ is closing in on the literally anything as young people are pressured to be upset and offended by an ever-lengthening list of perceived horrors and verbal transgressions (Fig 294 ). Trigger warnings alert the permanently anxious and fearful of something coming up in a book, video, lecture or stage play that might trouble them. This has now reached such extraordinary levels that trigger warnings include: Theology students alerted to upcoming images and discussion of the crucifixion so they can choose to leave; archaeology students warned about any ‘well-preserved archaeological body from an archaeological context’ in case they find it ‘a bit gruesome’; forensic science students warned before lectures involving blood patterns, crime scenes and dead bodies; Carleton University in Canada removed scales from the campus fitness centre to protect people with a special sensitivity to learning their weight. One student said: ‘Scales are very triggering.’ Don’t bloody use them then. An article in the London Guardian listed some trigger warning subjects: misogyny, the death penalty, calories in a food item, how much a person weighs, terrorism, drunk driving, racism, gun violence, drones, homophobia, post-traumatic stress disorder, slavery, victim-blaming, abuse, swearing, child abuse, self-injury, suicide, talk of drug use, descriptions of medical procedures, corpses, skulls, skeletons, needles, discussion of ‘isms’, shaming, slurs (including ‘stupid’ or ‘dumb’), kidnapping, dental trauma, discussions of sex (even consensual), death or dying, spiders, insects, snakes, vomit, pregnancy, childbirth, blood, Nazi paraphernalia, slimy things, holes (don’t ask) and ‘anything that might inspire intrusive thoughts in people with obsessive compulsive disorder‘. The New York Time s reported that activists want many classic works to have trigger warnings printed on them like health advisories on cigarette packages. Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice would need the label ‘contains anti-Semitism’ while Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway would require a warning that it mentions suicide. Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart is another book of concern which may ‘trigger readers who have experienced racism, colonialism, religious persecution, violence, suicide and more’. The ‘anti-Semitism’ industry and Israel Protection Racket has even called for trigger warnings to be inserted in the Bible and Koran to alert readers to upcoming ‘anti-Semitic’ texts. The self-obsession and sense of entitlement is just extraordinary from self-appointed ‘leaders’ of 0.2 percent of the world population. The ‘anti-Semitism’ Protection Racket was New Woke before New Woke and has had a highly-significant role in creating it. Kent University professor Frank Furedi rightly calls the trigger warning phenomenon and its associated ‘snowflake’ mentality the therapy culture, therapeutic censorship and the medicalisation of reading.

Figure 295: You need protection. Give me your freedom and leave the rest to me.

Figure 296: I demand you take away everbody’s freedom to save us from what you have told us to be frightened of and offended by. (Image by Ben Garrision at Grrrgraphics.com .)

The term ‘trigger’ appropriately comes from the language of the mind control industry as I have been describing for decades long before it became part of PC New Woke culture. ‘To trigger’ refers to key words, phrases or sounds that trigger or activate preprogrammed ‘Manchurian Candidate’ behaviour by mind-controlled assets of government/military/intelligence agency mind control programmes like the infamous MKUltra in the United States. We need to face the fact for the sake of young generations that they are being subjected in schools and universities to systematic mass mind control and a major part of that is to have them perceive themselves as victims. New Woke verbiage is constantly focused on seeking out ever more reasons for victimhood. The Cult sub-text is that once you fall for being a victim you give your power away to the perceived victimiser and look for state protection from them often in the form of censorship (Fig 295 ). Victimhood is worn like a badge of honour by many New Wokers and allows the ongoing life dramas of the grievance, victim culture in which so many permanently live. You say you’re a victim? Well, choose not to be. You say you’re offended? Well, choose not to be. Do that and see your power return. I don’t wonder that New Wokers suffer from ongoing anxiety when they are manipulated to want protection from anything that moves and a lot that doesn’t. Everything around them is potential danger from which they must be protected and most notably the perceived demise of the planetary ecosystem through climate change. The technique is to indoctrinate children and young people to fear an ever-lengthening list of dangers and then have them demand that Big Brother authority protects them from the big bad world (Fig 296 ). This is the real reason for the ‘Health and Safety’ culture in the UK in which once everyday happenings are now perceived as highly dangerous. Words that people say are defined as a form of violence that require protection and this provides the added bonus of censoring people against the list of PC offences and fears. Many parents mollycoddle their children and protect them from all upset to the point where they don’t have the emotional skin and skills to cope with life’s challenges or anyone questioning their perceptual certainty. Writer Claire Fox, a former Brexit Party member of the European Parliament, said:

Why are we surprised that teenagers demand safe spaces? Historically, adolescents might have been risk-takers and adventure-seekers, but today we rear children to perceive the world as an endlessly scary place. NGOs and charities ultimately the Cult, in particular, promote panic … Reared on a diet of disaster hyperbole, it’s no wonder children grow up scared of their own shadows …

… Today, parents go to ludicrous lengths to eliminate all risk from their children’s lives. Inevitably this narrows their horizons and teaches them to be less daring. Health-and-safety mania means the young are denied resilience-building freedoms that past generations enjoyed, such as playing outdoors, climbing trees and walking to school unaided.

Fox said modern mollycoddling means that the young have been prevented from engaging in activities such as leapfrog, marbles and conkers while a child-protection industry actively encourages children to see potential abuse everywhere. Schools are surrounded by prison-like fences and systems which constantly infuse a perception of danger. Fox described how safeguarding has become the top priority in every organisation that works with children to the extent that parents are banned from taking photographs of their own children at swimming galas and adults are only allowed into many parks ‘if accompanied by a child’. She continues:

There is no mystery to the absurdities of the Stepford Student. Nor should we wonder at their sudden appearance. We – adult society – protect children from criticism and suspend our critical judgment in order to massage their self-esteem. We scare them rigid by ‘catastrophising’ an endless list of fears. We make them hypervigilant about potential abuse from adults and their peers. We encourage them to equate abusive words with physical violence. And we have, in short, shaped our own overanxious, easily offended, censoriously thin-skinned Frankenstein monster. We created Generation Snowflake.

Some students say that even being called a snowflake is dangerous to their mental health and there’s a whole new industry specialising in the psychological health of children and young people in the light of so many being diagnosed with ‘mental health problems’. Suicide among the young is soaring. There is a reason for all this – children and young people in big numbers are being driven crazy by a merciless Cult-controlled system that wants to break their spirit and have them bow to its will for the entirety of their adult life.

In search of certainty

Figure 297: Woke self-delusion.

Insecurity seeks out certainty to placate that insecurity and from this comes the ‘moral’ and non-factual ‘certainty’ of New Wokeness. ‘I am right’ also includes ‘I am nice’, ‘I am good’ and ‘I am ethical’ – all with the proviso that anyone thinking differently must therefore not be right, nice or ethical (Fig 297 ). UK activist Jordi Casamitjana took his employer to a tribunal to secure the term ‘ethical veganism’ as a ‘protected philosophical belief’. He won the case – of course he did. Notice the ‘protected belief’ was not ‘veganism’, a lifestyle choice people have every right to make, but ‘ethical veganism’. Casamitjana said this involved much more than not eating food with animal ingredients: ‘It’s a philosophy and a belief system which encompasses most aspects of my life.’ This is New Woke intersectionality. His lifestyle includes: Walking rather than taking a bus to avoid any ‘accidental crashes with insects or birds’ (so he never unknowingly stands on insects when he walks and never travels in cars?); on occasions that he does take a bus he avoids holding on to leather straps; and he doesn’t eat non-meat figs because they are ‘grown with a symbiotic relationship to a microscopic wasp’ and so ‘you can’t be sure whether any of the wasp’s larvae is still inside the ripened fig and therefore I consider consumption of figs to be inconsistent with veganism’. Will you tell him or shall I that everything is conscious? ‘Ethical veganism’ is not something that can be defined unless you credibly define ‘ethical’. One person’s ethical is another person’s madness. The dictionary tells us that ethical ‘pertains to or deals with morals or the principles of morality and pertains to right and wrong in conduct.’ Who decides what is right and wrong? Who decides what is ethical? Casamitjana likely thinks it’s ethical to demonise the gas of life and tell kids they are facing climate meltdown when I say that’s seriously irresponsible and unethical.

To the New Woke mentality what they think and ‘ethical’ must be interchangeable. How could it be any other way? My view by contrast is that those who want their claim to be ‘ethical’ enshrined in law might benefit from checking out the definition of up-your-own-arse. Dr Jeanette Rowley, a vegan rights campaigner, said that in her direct experience ‘veganism is a way of life that defines the vegan individual as much as someone saying, for example, they are Christian or Muslim’. New Wokeness is indeed a religion designed to eventually replace all the others. Rowley said ‘the ethical vegan’ one means the other by definition makes a defining statement that their outlook on the world is grounded by justice, respect, duty, care and compassion in a community of sentient others, human and nonhuman, whom they do not wish to harm and whom they will endeavour to protect.’ What about harming non-meat plant consciousness? What about the ‘respect’ of seeking to impose their life choices on everyone and in many cases abusing those who make another choice? What about potential harm to the health of converts when the idea that one food choice fits all is fantasy and at odds with the evidence? What about frightening kids into believing the world could end and telling them veganism is essential to saving humanity so your agenda prevails? What about the enormous numbers of bees and insects that die (along with animals) as a result of the artificial pollination (known as ‘migratory beekeeping’), herbicides and pesticides involved in most plant-based production? What about the devastation of human society and employment through ridiculous demands to curtail the gas of life that produces the very vegetation they eat? I could go on and a lot of things that vegetarians and vegans eat is absolute crap like soy and tofu. Once anyone claims a monopoly on being ‘ethical’ the hypocrisy and contradiction soon starts to unravel. They would put their case much more effectively if many were not so obviously convinced of their own perfection and self-purity. But, then, that is the very foundation of New Wokeness. Are they trying to convince the rest of us – or themselves ?

Why facts are so dangerous

Narcissists are always insecure and vulnerable. Narcissism is a cover to hide their insecurity from other people and again most importantly from themselves. All the most outwardly and exaggeratingly self-assured characters I have met have been frightened little boys and girls behind the facade. Genuine self-security doesn’t need narcissism when it doesn’t need external confirmation or self-promotion of its sense of identity through the reaction of others. You agree with me and think I’m intelligent and wise? Okay. You think I am wrong and an idiot? Equally okay. Genuine security treats them both as twin imposters. It is in security that needs the facade of perceived security not least to convince itself. In the same way I am right is terrified of being wrong and it’s another reason New Wokers don’t deal in facts. They are manipulated to perceive everything through the filter of emotion and moral superiority which is easy to induce. Facts are the sworn enemy of such emotional certainty and they have to go. New Woke congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez captured the theme perfectly when she said: ‘There’s a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.’ Without the facts what is there to be ‘morally right’ about? What is the bloody point of being ‘morally right’ about a human-caused climate disaster that is not happening? Facts immediately usher black and white perceptions into shades of grey and this is another reason why facts are so yesterday. How can you sell a belief in imminent climate mass extinction which isn’t happening if you have to deal in facts? The impossible only becomes possible when you can lie and misrepresent while censoring those with a factual response that exposes I am right as utter bollocks. This technique can be seen everywhere with climate change, race, sexuality and transgender activism. It goes like this: When you cannot support your stance and demands with facts and would therefore lose the debate you shut down the debate with abusive labels, de-platforming and media censorship.

There is no need to factually justify your re-writing of human biology and that’s good because you never could. Instead you assert that a man can be a woman and vice-versa by merely claiming to be so. You campaign to have professors of biology dismissed and their careers destroyed for saying otherwise. Once a few scientists and academics have been vanquished by the mob others will keep their head down or even parrot New Woke claptrap to protect their careers and income. This has happened across a great swathe of subjects and situations as Yuri Bezmenov’s ‘demoralisation’ has hurtled so fast to its ‘normalisation’. In this way schools and college campuses have been invaded and overrun by Cult New Wokeness and places of alleged ‘education’ have become initiation centres for a lifetime in La, La Land. I saw a British ‘social activist’ (whatever that is) called Lee Jasper complaining that film producer Guy Richie should have had a ‘broader social conscience and responsibility’ over the content of a film about gangsters because it was ‘not reflecting the kind of future which is of a more inclusive sense of British nationalism.’ The fact that gangsters don’t act like New Wokers and the film was about gangsters could not breach the New Woke filter which believes that everything should be portrayed as it would like it to be rather than as it really is. Facts are so lethally dangerous to the Cult’s collective emotional reality construct that they must be censored and deleted. This is being done through the Cult’s ‘education’, mainstream media, Silicon Valley and government legislation where only one version of everything is allowed to be emphasised and eventually even heard at all. Put these aspects together of faith-based belief and unquestioning certainty with silencing the blasphemers and you have a religion. New Wokeness is a faith-based, facts-unnecessary, religion or cult which imposes its will by indoctrinating the congregation and accepting no dissent. Burned at the stake becomes a Facebook ban and a Twitter flogging. Jesus walked on water becomes the gas of life is a deadly pollutant and a man can be a woman simply by saying so. The Climate Cult, as a sub-division and in many ways foundation pillar of New Wokeness, is itself a religion as you would expect in such circumstances.