All of this may be why, when a medical study looked at medical conditions described on Wikipedia pages and compared it to actual peer-reviewed published research, Wikipedia contradicted medical research 90 percent of the time. You may never fully trust what you read on Wikipedia again, nor should you.

Figure 229: Hijacking global perception.

You won’t be surprised to know that Wikipedia is an agency of the agenda as a platform where billions get their information about people, events and every other subject (Fig 229 ). Israel (its Sabbatian-Frankist control system) has a colossal astroturfing and opinion-manipulating army driving its global ‘Hasbara’ campaign to promote the narrative of what I call the ‘Anti-Semitism Protection Racket’ (more shortly) and the far-right Sabbatian-Frankist apartheid Israeli government. Hasbara means ‘explaining’ which really means explaining what the Sabbatian-Frankists want you to believe. Ultra-Zionist ownership of the media in the United States is infamous although the Protection Racket intimidates most people from stating the obvious. Where there is not direct ownership there is a whole network operating out of Israel and exposed in The Trigger that manipulates media coverage of Israel. Jewish News reported in 2019 about an email sent to the wrong address by Lorna Fitzsimons, director of BICOM (the British Israel Communication & Research Centre). The email, which was never meant to be widely distributed, said: ‘Throughout the weekend, BICOM staff were in contact with a whole host of BBC and Sky News desks and journalists, ensuring that the most objectively favourable line was taken, and offering talking heads, relevant to the stories unfolding.’ Fitzsimons went on to describe a BICOM trip to Israel by a BBC news presenter:

Bicom has one of BBC News’ key anchors on a bespoke delegation. When planning her very first trip to the region, Sophie Long got in touch with Bicom to see if we could help her out with meeting sic in the region. Sophie is now spending three days of her trip with Bicom Israel, taking a tour around the Old City, meeting Israeli government spokesman Mark Regev… as well as visiting Ramallah and Sderot.

This is how your ‘news’ is manipulated by ultra-Zionism alone every day. If you read The Trigger the scale on which this is happening out of Israel worldwide will blow your mind. Add into the mix the expanded definition of ‘anti-Semitism’ which includes criticism of Israel and Zionism and you see how any balanced coverage of Israel (Sabbatian-Frankists that control Israel) has long past. Ultra-Zionist Fitzsimons, a former Labour Party MP and president of the National Union of Students, said in the email that BICOM had ‘briefed Jonathan Ford, the Financial Times leader writer for his upcoming leading article’. I wonder if the Palestinians had, too? That’s obviously a rhetorical question. The now shocking scale of Sabbatian-Frankist control worldwide hiding behind ‘Israel’ was further confirmed, as with my own speaking ban from Australia in 2019, by the experience of former Pink Floyd singer Roger Waters and American journalist Abby Martin who are both critics of Israeli government treatment of Palestinians. American Major League Baseball banned advertising for Waters events on its platforms on the say-so of Rothschild-created B’nai B’rith International who have been on my case many times. B’nai B’rith president Charles Kaufman and chief executive Daniel Mariaschin said Waters was ‘an avowed anti-Semite whose views on Jews and Israel far exceed the boundaries of civil discourse’. This is Orwellian code for ‘Waters tells the truth so we have to shut him up’. Abby Martin is suing the state of Georgia after she was prevented from speaking at Georgia Southern University for refusing to sign a pledge of allegiance to Israel . Some 28 states have so far mandated loyalty pledges to Israel to block exposure of the actions of its government, military and fantastic web of lobby groups. That is worth pondering for a moment to take in the full implications of Sabbatian-Frankist power in the United States. American citizens cannot speak in a country that claims free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment unless they sign a pledge of alliance to a country of a few million people 5,000 miles away. But no – saying that Israel has fantastically disproportionate global power compared with size and numbers is an ‘anti-Semitic’ trope even though it’s blatantly true. This is what happens where the Cult is in control.

Forest protection agency

We now have global ‘news’ spewing out the Cult system’s version of everything 24/7 on channels so many in number I’m sure they must breed overnight like luminous jackets appear to do in Britain. Media ‘diversity’ is a joke. Newspapers and TV channels may be biased to one political party or other, but they are all biased in support of the same system – the same Postage Stamp. They differ on the twigs while all promote the same forest. Arguments over twigs present the illusion of diversity. Challenge the forest, the structure of control and manipulation, and the truth about ‘diversity’ becomes self-evident. They all promote and protect the forest as I’ve found again and again in the last 30 years. The media first ridiculed me on a historic scale before turning to abuse and demonisation which morphed more recently into outright ignoring or censoring me. These phases directly relate to the scale of public interest in my work which has been growing exponentially year on year. That Icke is exposing the forest – laugh at him. Er, that didn’t work – demonise him. Oh no, that didn’t work – censor him! The censorship was never more obvious than with the publication of my absolutely explosive book, The Trigger , which exposes who was really behind the attacks of 9/11 and it wasn’t 19 Arab hijackers working for Osama bin Laden. In revealing the central players in that horror I also reveal the Cult and its control system. It is so explosive and perceptually transforming that the usual suspects didn’t even seek to attack me and the book as they normally would. Abuse would give the content publicity and they want the fewest number possible to know it exists. One of the main ways the Cult has sought to demonise me is through its anti-Semitism industry, or Protection Racket. Its method of operation is to condemn anyone (especially Jewish people) who criticise the government of Israel as ‘anti-Semitic (which really means anti-Arab as I have explained many times). Cult gofers, many of which won’t even know there is a Cult, have used this label to block my public events and media appearances including a ban by the Australian government from speaking in that country on the say-so of one ultra-Zionist asset and pressure from media outlets owned by Israel-fanatic Rupert Murdoch. This censorship network is a protection racket to protect the Cult from exposure and not Jewish people from discrimination. Jewish people who don’t conform to the narrative are attacked even more vociferously than anyone else.

I did two interviews with the now Rupert Murdoch-owned TalkRadio in Britain which at the time of writing have accrued in excess of three million views on YouTube. The ultra-Zionist censor group, the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA), complained to the station for having me on because of ‘anti-Semitism’ even though neither Israel nor Zionism was discussed in either interview. Several TalkRadio programmes were later sent copies of The Trigger , but not one would have me on to discuss the content despite the previous two getting such big YouTube audiences. Protecting the forest is far more important to media owners than money. The Cult ensures their major assets are swimming in that. No British national newspaper or radio station would even mention The Trigger and 5,000 media releases sent out to newspapers, radio and television across Britain, Europe and North America met with no mainstream response. A TV booker told me that a well-known British television talk show host refused to have me on his show because I ‘deny the Holocaust’. I don’t , if you read my books, but he wouldn’t know that because he takes his cue from other media promotors of The System. The mainstream media operates likes The System in general with the perceptually-programmed confirming to each other that their perceptual-programming is the truth. Cult assets lie and misrepresent people; the media report the lies unchallenged; other media assets believe the lies and accept them as their reality; and they then repeat and further circulate the lies as ‘everyone knows that’ truth. Copies of The Trigger were sent to the Russian ‘alternative’ TV station RT in both London and Moscow. They didn’t want to know either. RT is funded by the Russian government and as such conducts journalism with regard to the West more in the way the Western media should be doing. I’m glad RT exists from that perspective. It questions what the Western media refuses to do except when it comes to the Russian government. RT journalistic values are then immediately ditched and cap-touching ‘yes sir, no sir’, kicks in. I have been writing and talking for 30 years about all the subjects that RT covers and although it claims to be ‘alternative’ they have never had me on their news programmes while preferring many who from my perspective are nowhere close to ‘alternative’. Why would a Russian government-funded station not want to discuss a mountain of evidence that the American government lied at every turn about 9/11?? I was approached out of the blue for a substantial feature interview by an RT reporter called Polly Boiko in September, 2019, which she said they wanted to go quickly to air. She and a crew came to my house soon after with a view to almost immediate transmission. They left after filming with me for hours and said they hoped it would be broadcast within days. As I write the best part of a year later I am still waiting. The mainstream media basically says question nothing; RT’s motto is ‘question more’; but I say question everything. That makes me an outsider to all of them. I dismantle the forest which their owners in multiple forms are pledged to protect. The Cult knows that seeing only the twigs keeps you in Body-Mind with a sense of apartness and twigs are not a problem. Seeing the forest and how it all fits together sets you free and that’s a BIG problem. Censor him!

By the few, for the few

Incessant concentration of media ownership is the Cult gathering ever more control over what people see and hear to dictate perception and behaviour across the world. Major corporations (in the end one Cult corporation) have secured global ownership of newspapers, radio, television and the Internet through Silicon Valley and Pentagon agency DARPA which I’ll come to shortly. The media once had some diversity of ownership and that could not be allowed to continue. Diversity is the enemy of central control and the campaign began to concentrate power for the benefit of the Cult. As recently as 1984 there were still 50 ‘independent’ media companies in the United States. By 2019 some 90 percent of the US media was controlled by just four – Comcast (NBCUniversal), Disney, AT&T (WarnerMedia) and Viacom. The last two are owned by the National Amusements corporation. Control over what you see and hear is now ridiculously narrow and planned to get even more so. Political leaders sanction this as you would expect when the Cult owns politics as it owns major media. Such concentration allows what is written and broadcast to be centrally dictated and focused only on the twigs while exposure of the forest is censored. You can see video compilations on the Internet of TV presenters in cities and communities across America reading the same stories word for word and repeating with guests the same scripted phrases and talking points to push the same political agenda. There was once such a thing as ‘independent radio’ in Britain and I worked at a station in Birmingham called BRMB. It was owned by a single company and had an independent operation for local news. Today those stations are owned by corporations with centrally-dictated news broadcasts and even music playlists. I was libelled by the usual suspects in the UK in 2017 with outrageous claims about what I am saying. I saw the same lies repeated – again almost word for word with the same headline – on a series of newspaper Internet sites. When I checked I realised they were all owned by the same corporation then called Trinity Mirror and now Reach PLC. This is what that company owns (not an exhaustive list) and it will give you an idea for what I mean about the centralisation of media power over what you see and hear:

National newspapers: Daily Mirror; Sunday Mirror; Daily Express; Sunday Express; Daily Record; Sunday Mail; Western Mail; The Sunday People; Irish Daily Mirror; Irish Daily Star (50% ownership). Local and regional newspapers; Accrington Observer; Anfield & Walton Star; Barking & Dagenham Yellow Advertiser; Bexley Mercury; Birmingham Post; Birmingham Mail; Sunday Mercury; Bootle Times; Bracknell Standard; Brent & Wembley Leader; Bristol Post; Buckinghamshire Examiner; Buckinghamshire Advertiser; Chester Chronicle; Chronicle Extra (Newcastle upon Tyne); Colne Valley Chronicle; Coventry Telegraph; The Crawley News; Crewe Chronicle; Crosby Herald; Derby Evening Telegraph; Dover Express; Ealing Gazette; Ealing Informer; Ealing Leader; Ellesmere Port Pioneer; Enfield Advertiser; Enfield Gazette; Evening Chronicle (Newcastle upon Tyne); Evening Gazette (Teesside); Express & Echo; Formby Times; Fulham & Hammersmith Chronicle; The Glaswegian; Gloucester Citizen; Gloucestershire Echo; Haringey Advertiser; Harrow & Wembley Observer; Harrow Informer; Harrow Leader; Havering Yellow Advertiser; Heywood Advertiser; Highdown Books; Hinckley Times; Hounslow Borough Chronicle; Hounslow, Chiswick & Whitton Informer; Huddersfield District Chronicle; Huddersfield Examiner; Hull Daily Mail; Ilford & Redbridge Yellow Advertiser; The Journal (Newcastle upon Tyne); Kensington & Chelsea Informer; Leicester Mercury; Lewisham & Greenwich Mercury; Liverpool Echo; Loughborough Echo; Manchester Evening News; Manchester Metro News; Maghull Star; Middleton Guardian; Mid Devon Gazette; Mitcham, Morden & Wimbledon Post; Neath Guardian; North East Manchester Advertiser; North Devon Journal; North Wales Daily Post; Nottingham Post; Oldham Advertiser; Ormskirk Advertiser; Paisley Daily Express; The Press (Barnet and Hendon); Prestwich Advertiser; Reading Post; Rochdale Observer; Rossendale Free Press; Runcorn & Widnes Weekly News; Salford Advertiser; Slough Express; Stockport Express; Macclesfield Express; Wilmslow Express; The Sentinel (Staffordshire); Surrey Advertiser; Southport Visiter; South Manchester Reporter; South Liverpool Merseymart; South Wales Echo; South Wales Evening Post; Staines Informer; Streatham, Clapham & West Norwood Post; Sunday Sun (Newcastle Upon Tyne); Surrey Herald; Surrey Mirror Advertiser; Sutton & Epsom Post; Tameside Advertiser; Glossop Advertiser; Uxbridge & Hillingdon Leader; Uxbridge Gazette; Walton & Weybridge Informer; The Wharf (Canary Wharf). Scottish and Universal Newspapers: Trinity Mirror Scotland; Airdrie and Coatbridge Advertiser; Ayrshire Post; Blairgowrie Advertiser; Business 7; Dumfries and Galloway Standard; East Kilbride News; Galloway News; Hamilton Advertiser; Irvine Herald; Kilmarnock Standard; Metro Scotland; Paisley Daily Express; Perthshire Advertiser; Scottish Business Insider; Stirling Observer; Strathearn Herald; The Lennox Herald; West Lothian Courier; Wishaw Press. Digital online brands: Belfast Live; Dublin Live; Examiner Live (Huddersfield); Glasgow Live; Gloucestershire Live; Leeds Live.

When you look around news shops and stands and see all those newspapers and magazines on every conceivable subject it appears that media diversity is alive and well. Check who owns them and you realise that media diversity is history. I list in my book Human Race Get Off Your Knee s the media outlets from television to magazines then owned by Time Warner. It is extraordinary in both length and range of subjects and goes on for more than one and a half pages. Two of America’s most prominent newspapers, the New York Times and Washington Post are both owned by the same elite. The Times has been owned by the Zionist Sulzberger family since 1896 while the Post was controlled from 1930s by the Zionist Graham-Meyer family before being sold to Amazon’s ‘world’s richest man’ Jeff Bezos in 2013 whose company has close ties to the CIA. No potential bias there, then.

The Devil’s Playground – media endgame

Figure 230: Cult to its DNA.

People get most of their information today in the form of ‘news’ through Cult-controlled Silicon Valley corporations such as Google, YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. Add to that the domination of the global book market by Amazon. The Cult created the Internet to serve its agenda for human control. In terms of the subject at hand they want all information to eventually be transferred to the Internet because then it can be censored through algorithms of artificial intelligence without even human involvement once the codes are in place. The Internet for all its short-term benefits has been a Trojan horse from the start and the real reason – or reasons – for its creation will become clear in later chapters. What a surprise that the Internet was made possible by the Cult-controlled US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the technological development arm of the Pentagon, which has seed-funded Silicon Valley corporations along with In-Q-Tel, or IQT, the technology-funding vehicle of the CIA (Fig 230 ). The Pentagon, DARPA and the CIA are all Cult assets and agencies of the ‘Deep State’. When the Internet was launched it had to be censorship-free to attract the global audience necessary for the DARPA (Cult) goal of making the World Wide Web the central pillar of human society. In this essential honeymoon period we enjoyed the free flow of information which allowed people like me to circulate research to expose the Cult. This was an unfortunate though necessary consequence from the Cult’s point of view in pursuit of its ultimate ambitions. Once the Internet was established as the said central pillar of human society in a way that is basically irreversible the mask could come off with a gathering frenzy of censorship to target information that in any way exposes the Cult agenda even without mention of the Cult itself. They, of course, don’t present this as censorship. They invent a series of made-up excuses such as ‘fake news’ and ‘hate speech’. The definition of both continues to be expanded to lasso ever more information, views and opinions into their calculated and systematic censorship in the guise of protecting the public from ‘hate’ and ‘discrimination’. They claim to be advancing ‘diversity’ while destroying it and this particularly applies to the ‘Woke’ mentality that claims to demand diversity in another example of Cult inversion. Cult-created ‘Wokeness’ is exploited to justify and impose ever more Internet and media censorship under the guise of political correctness. The Woke British trade union organisation, the TUC, banned a premier of Renegade , a film about my life and work, from one of its buildings on the grounds that the TUC ‘believes in diversity’. Well, clearly with the exception of anyone exposing the forest. For the TUC read the global mainstream media.

Technology is increasingly being introduced that will prevent the posting of information unacceptable to the Cult without the need to take it down. Even now YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and others employ ‘ghost or shadow banning’ in which material can be posted but algorithms ensure that they are seen by a fraction of what would otherwise be the case. My YouTube interviews about The Trigger and 9/11 were blatantly suppressed through the recommendation system and while they still got large numbers they were not on the scale they would have been if left unmolested. Highly significantly my video interviews have got by far their biggest audiences when posted on YouTube channels not subject to shadow banning than they did on my own algorithmically-manipulated channel before YouTube deleted me altogether in May, 2020 (more later). Facebook admitted in 2018 that it ‘demotes’ posts reported by users (easy to arrange) and rated as false by ‘fact checkers’ (working for the Cult agenda). Facebook claimed that this censorship reduced views of posts and pages by ‘around 80 percent’. As all information is moved to the Net the point will be reached when the Cult can literally control everything you see with the tyranny of (Cult-instigated) political correctness intimidating people into censoring even private conversations out of fear of being exposed for ‘hate speech’. Cult-serving Google, Google-owned YouTube, Facebook and Twitter are major actors in this stage show to hide the real reason that censorship is happening which to protect the Cult and its agenda for humanity from exposure. These Internet-dominating corporations and others like Amazon have been taken through the same process as the World Wide Web. First they allowed the free circulation of information and opinion because they, too, had to attract users on a world-changing scale on their way to near-monopoly. Once that line had been crossed by hugely predominant market share their masks could also be removed and censorship of Cult-unapproved information and opinion began as a drip before becoming the biblical flood that it is today. Amazon has long passed the point of domination in book sales to drive independent shops and publishers out of business and has now begun to target books for censorship in its version of the book-burning so beloved of tyrannies. We have reached the point where people cannot post anything questioning official narratives of 9/11, human-caused climate change or the ‘pandemic’ on platforms like YouTube without them adding links to read the official fairy tale version on Cult-serving Wikipedia . You want the official story of anything ? Go to Wikipedia. How plain it is to see how information is being royally stitched up and we are still nowhere near where it is meant to go although the massive leap in censorship since the ‘Covid-19’ hoax gives you some idea. Another point here is that the Cult owns the financial system and has limitless funds by creating ‘money’ out of nothing. Money is therefore no object for corporations like Google, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon which had no need to post a profit as they were buying their way to monopoly. ‘Investors’ were always there to write the cheques. You see the same with anything related to Elon Musk (more later). How can other companies that do have to make a profit to survive compete with those that don’t have to be profitable and have the financial capability to buy out or crush any independent opposition? Genuine opposition that won’t sell-out is demonised by the media under the usual tag of ‘hate speech’ when they establish other social media and video platforms. Cult-owned website hosts and payment companies also ban them to destroy their ability to function.

Silicon censors

Self-deluding so-called ‘journalists’ who support this war on information are promoting their own demise as traditional media falls to Silicon Valley domination and its censorship algorithms. Google virtually monopolise Internet searches which are algorithmically manipulated to emphasise official narratives and suppress alternatives. Where Google doesn’t control searches other Cult operations pick up the slack. Google-owned YouTube monopolise video content and social media domination falls to Facebook and Twitter. What about Instagram? Owned by Facebook. I don’t use social media – I message with WhatsApp? Owned by Facebook. Big Tech was made exempt by government from lawsuits for postings on their platforms in return for acting as neutral vehicles rather than publishers who do face legal action for what they publish. Silicon Valley psychopaths have benefited from one while ignoring the other by censoring information challenging the official narrative and particularly those known in America as conservatives. Government could rescind the ‘liability exception’ deal, but hasn’t. It is indicative of how the Cult works that ‘conservative’ organisations funded by the billionaire Koch family (‘conservative’) and Big Tech have been exposed for campaigning against laws to stop Big Tech censorship of conservatives. Control both sides and you control the game. Even more sinister is that these mega-corporations connect into the Cult-controlled Pentagon and intelligence agency network. Big Tech is continually exposed for gathering user data of every kind including surveillance through microphones and this ends up with the military-industrial-intelligence complex on a scale never made public. Many people have noted that conversations they thought were private lead immediately to products relating to the conversation being offered to them in Facebook and other advertisements. Official owners of these Cult-fronts like Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg are super-frauds who are not ultimately in control. They are front people for forces much deeper in The Web than the Zuckerbergs will ever be. Silicon Valley giants are there to control what you see and keep detailed surveillance on what you do, say, and think. Facebook admitted in a letter to two US senators that it can locate where you are even if you have opted out of location tracking. Artificial intelligence can piece together other information to determine location including tagged photographs, addresses for purchases on the Facebook shopping section, and IP address information. Amnesty International said that Google and Facebook were ‘posing a systemic threat to human rights’ – exactly as they are meant to.

Tim Berners-Lee who is credited with inventing the World Wide Web unveiled a nine-point plan or ‘contract’ through his World Wide Foundation to ‘save the internet’ from ‘digital dystopia’. Some things sounded good until you knew the flip-side. Authors of this ‘contract’ included the hate-speech, censorship-obsessed French and German governments and major Silicon Valley censors like Google, Facebook and Microsoft. A highly-significant sentence said it was necessary to ‘develop technologies that support the best in humanity and challenge the worst’. When passed through an Orwellian translation unit this becomes ‘develop technologies to silence dissenters and renegades’. Who decides what is the ‘best’ and ‘worst’, Tim? Ah, The System does which wants to silence dissenters and renegades. Ah, gotcha. World Wide Web Foundation president and chief executive Adrian Lovett said prime issues include the problem of ‘disinformation’. Who decides what that is? Same answer. He said they will ‘track progress of all of those who have signed on, and others too who haven’t, and report that progress, make sure it’s public, make sure that we’re able to see who is going in the right direction and who is not.’ Who decides what direction is ‘right’? Same answer. The group hopes to enforce the contract through UN regulations and EU/national laws while companies that don’t sign up would be ostracised. The group says it will have succeeded when governments and companies that don’t back the contract ‘principles’ are ‘true outliers’ (defined as ‘a person or thing situated away or detached from the main body or system’). Companies and governments that broke the Internet are claiming to save it by taking a rock-hammer to what’s left of free expression. Claim you are stopping Internet dystopia while creating it and say at first this will be voluntary before enforcement by law. Does Berners-Lee know it’s a scam to advance Internet dictatorship? It doesn’t really matter. The corporations and the Cult do.