Oh, Climate Cultists may say, higher CO2 might be better for plants, but it will cause the Earth to heat catastrophically. I mean, Greta Thunberg says we should believe that our house is on fire and she wouldn’t mislead us, right? Well, if she has been mercilessly mislead herself I think she probably would. In fact, temperature rises don’t follow increases in CO2 – it’s the other way round as the records clearly show. In the last 400,000 years CO2 has lagged temperature by an average of 800 years. As Patrick Moore rightly says carbon dioxide cannot be the cause of rising temperature when the increase in temperature comes before the increase in CO2. How can the effect come before the cause? It can’t. So here’s a shocker for New Wokers … temperature must be affecting CO2 levels and not vice-versa. Here we have yet another classic Cult inversion of the truth. How could temperature increase CO2? The ocean contains 45 times more CO2 than we have in the atmosphere and the ocean releases carbon dioxide in warm periods and absorbs it in colder periods. The lag between the two is around 800 years and look what was happening 800 years ago …. the Medieval Warm Period . Carbon dioxide does not cause the Earth to catastrophically warm. The history of CO2 correlation with temperature shows that for immense periods the two have been completely out of kilter. Temperatures have risen and remained high as CO2 went down. Carbon dioxide is also only 0.117 percent of what are called greenhouse gases while more than 90 percent of those gases are water vapour and clouds (Fig 270 ). Only a fraction of that 0.117 percent is CO2 caused by human activity and the rest happens naturally. Professional conman Al Gore tried to obscure this fact by saying that if you ‘take water vapour out of the equation CO2 is 30 percent of greenhouse gases’. Don’t buy a used car from that man or even a new one. How can you ‘take water vapour out of the equation’ when that together with clouds makes up close to the entirety of greenhouse gases? To deceive – that’s how. Calculated demonisation of CO2 is so transparent. Professor Leslie Woodcock, Emeritus Professor at the University of Manchester, fellow of the Royal Society of Chemical Engineering, a recipient of a Max Plank Society Visiting Fellowship, and former NASA researcher, said:

Water is a much more powerful greenhouse gas, and there is 20 times more of it in our atmosphere, around one percent of the atmosphere, whereas CO2 is only 0.04 percent. Carbon dioxide has been made out to be some kind of toxic gas, but the truth is that it’s the gas of life. We breathe it out, plants breathe it in and it’s not caused by us. Global warming is nonsense.

British scientist James Lovelock was a one-time Green icon with his Gaia theory of the Earth as a living entity (true). He became even more acclaimed by climate alarmists when he predicted in his book The Revenge of Gaia that ‘billions will die’ and humanity was doomed. Lovelock wrote that any survivors would have to live in the Arctic which would be one of the few habitable places on Earth. Then reality dawned and to his enormous credit he had the courage to publicly change his mind. Humanity was not in imminent peril after all. Lovelock now says that climate alarmism is not ‘remotely scientific’, computer models are unreliable and anyone who tries to ‘predict more than five to ten years is a bit of an idiot’. A single volcano can make more difference to global warming than humans ever could, he has stated. He accuses the Greens of exaggeration and behaving ‘deplorably’. Weather Channel founder John Coleman has said human-caused global warming is a myth and the list of scientists saying the same is getting longer by the week. Such honesty often comes at a cost, however, in the form of lost jobs and income. Dr Judith Curry, a respected climatologist and tenured professor at Georgia Tech University, left her ‘dream job’ when she refused to pledge unquestioning obedience to the Climate Cult. She told Fox News:

I’ve been vilified by some of my colleagues who are activists and don’t like anybody challenging their big story … I walk around with knives sticking out of my back … In the university environment I felt like I was just beating my head against the wall.

Curry is a target of an establishment-promoted ‘climate advocacy group’ called Skeptical Science which operates a ‘blacklist’ of scientists who won’t comply with Climate Cult orthodoxy. Dana Nuccitelli, one of the principals of Skeptical Science, wrote of Curry: ‘If you look at the statements we cataloged and debunked … it should make her unhirable in academia.’ Judith Curry is a former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech and a Fellow of both the American Geophysical Union and American Meteorological Society. She was only ‘unhirable’ because the Climate Cult made it so. Curry was asked to step down by her university for her views on climate and had ‘numerous inquiries from academic headhunters encouraging me to apply for major administration positions, ranging from Dean to Vice Chancellor for Research’. She didn’t even make the shortlist. Curry said in a Forbes interview:

They thought I was an outstanding candidate, looked excellent on paper, articulated a strong vision, and interviewed very well in person. The show stopper was my public profile in the climate debate, as evidenced by a simple Google search.

Figure 271:Refuse to sing from the song-sheet and you’re gone.

Google is so helpful in ensuring that Skeptical Science is on the first page and sometimes the top listing for a word search for Judith or Judy Curry. This is the tyranny that genuine academics and scientists are facing from the Climate Cult in all its forms. Who created Skeptical Science? John Cook , the Australian bloke most quoted about ‘97 percent of climate scientists’ agreeing that humans are most responsible for climate change when his ‘research’ doesn’t say that at all. Small world, eh? Those that don’t accept climate change orthodoxy are labelled ‘anti-science’ when questioning every hypothesis is what real science is all about. It’s the Climate Cult that is anti-science (another inversion). French television weatherman Philippe Verdier was fired by the France 2 channel for publishing a book accusing ‘climate experts’ of misleading the public and the Cult-controlled UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of publishing deliberately misleading data (Fig 271 ). What he said is true and he was sacked because it is true. Programmed New Woke trade union members at the station demanded he was dismissed. Verdier wrote his book after French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius asked TV meteorologists to highlight climate change issues in their broadcasts. ‘I was horrified by this speech,’ Verdier said.

Cult narrative: humanity is the enemy

Figure 272: An academic promoting the end of humanity. She is teaching young people, right? Wow. Her extreme of extreme views are fine with Woke. It’s when you say men and women are biologically different that you trigger their ire.

Greenpeace co-founder Patrick Moore is a scientist who says the Greens have abandoned science and replaced it with emotion and sensationalism based on an ‘anti-human’ agenda that paints humanity as the enemy of the Earth. If you are a Death Cult targeting humanity would you not want them to believe that they were the problem? Wouldn’t you want them to despise themselves and turn against themselves? You surely would. We breathe out carbon dioxide and even the act of breathing is harming the planet – ahhhhh!!! Humans are deadly. We must kill them. A vegan father-of-four voiced this anti-human mentality when he called a UK radio station to say humans shouldn’t breed to produce more offspring to ‘harm animals’. He urged people to encourage a ‘graceful ending of our time on the planet’. The caller, who gave the name ‘Danny’, said he had recently discovered ‘anti-natalism’ – ‘the idea that we shouldn’t be breeding humans when it causes so much unnecessary suffering to animals, especially people who bring up children to eat meat’. Should we then not allow animals to breed when they cause so much harm to each other in the killing fields that are the ‘natural world’? ‘Danny’ said there was nothing wrong with human extinction and admitted that he tells his nine-year-old son and older daughters to question their own reproduction and whether they should be here in the first place. ‘I don’t want grandchildren, and I don’t want them to impose life on another generation for no good reason.’ He’s not psychologically damaged or anything and this is not in any way psychological abuse of his children. These views may seem seriously extreme, but the guy is far from alone and they are just the attitudes you want to engender when you are a Death Cult led by unseen ‘gods’ that wish to replace humanity as we know it today (more later). It would be easy to dismiss an anonymous caller to a radio station if what he said was not being promoted by academics such as Patricia MacCormack, a professor of continental philosophy at Anglia Ruskin University in Cambridge. She argues in her book, The Ahuman Manifesto , that ‘the only solution for climate change is letting the human race become extinct’ (Fig 272 ). This was the headline in an interview with MacCormack in which she set out a ‘positive view’ for the future of Earth without humans. She said she came to these conclusions through her interest in feminism and ‘queer theory’ and railed against ‘this hierarchal world where white, male, heterosexual and able-bodied people are succeeding, and people of different races, genders, sexualities and those with disabilities are struggling to get that’. Well, best get rid of everyone then.

MacCormack further argues that we need to dismantle religion while clearly not realising that she is a member of one. She said that humans are already enslaved to the point of ‘zombiedom’ (oh, the irony) by ‘capitalism’ and because of the damage this has caused ‘phasing out reproduction is the only way to repair the damage done to the world’. This is straight from the Cult agenda for a mass human cull as will become clear and she will be utterly oblivious to that. The realisation that such mentalities are teaching young people is very sobering while at the same time explains so much about where New Woke is coming from.

To summarise what Patrick Moore has said, and what I have observed for decades, the Green movement that he and I remember has been hijacked by New Woke and real environmental issues are being marginalised and sacrificed on the altar of global warming. We have the obsession with ‘climate change’ while genuine pollution increases, including radiation pollution, and US Green New Deal promotor Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez represents a district awash with trash in the streets. I am so glad I was briefly a national spokesman for the Green Party in the 1980s. It has given me such an insight into the mentality that drives the tyranny of the New Woke Climate Cult today. Moore brings sanity to the debate when he says that carbon dioxide is a building block for all life on earth and without its presence in the global atmosphere in sufficient concentrations this would be a dead planet. He says that all life is carbon-based including our own and he describes carbon dioxide as ‘the currency of life’ and the most important building block for terrestrial life. ‘Yet today our children and our publics are taught that CO2 is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilisation to its knees.’ Once again if you were a Death Cult with humanity in its gunsights wouldn’t you want them to believe that what keeps them alive threatens their existence? Wouldn’t you want them to dismantle what gives them life? What a testament to the programming of human perception that so many believe this absurdity to their core.

Climate Cult veganism – not so simple

We have a perfect system in which humans breathe in oxygen and breathe out carbon dioxide (how dare we?) while plant life and trees absorb carbon dioxide and produce oxygen during the day by converting sunlight, carbon dioxide and water into carbohydrates and oxygen in a process called photosynthesis. The Sun, like carbon dioxide, is obviously essential to life on Earth and notice that both are being targeted. We are encouraged to fear the Sun through the climate hoax on the grounds that it generates heat (while not presenting the Sun as a source of global temperature!) and we are urged to cover our skin with cancer-causing chemicals in sun lotion when the skin turns sunlight into the essential vitamin D so vital to human health. This process of synthesising sunlight into vitamin D is achieved through cholesterol in the skin cells – the same cholesterol that is also vilified as we are urged to ‘lower your cholesterol’ and take ongoing, health-destroying statin drugs to do so (ka-ching say the Big Pharma tills). We are told by officialdom that LDL cholesterol, or low-density lipoproteins, is ‘bad cholesterol’ and can cause heart disease. To save ourselves we should take statins. A global team of 17 doctors published a study of nearly 1.3 million people in 2018 that concluded there is no link between high LDL cholesterol and heart disease and that statins were, with serious understatement, of ‘doubtful benefit’. The study, published in the Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology , exposed the demonisation of cholesterol and reported that heart attack patients were shown to have lower than normal levels of LDL or ‘bad cholesterol’. Professor Sherif Sultan, one of the authors, said the ‘strongest finding’ was elderly people with high levels of LDL live the longest. The big rule of thumb to remember: If ‘The System’ is pushing something it’s bad for humanity. If it is targeting something it’s good for humanity. It works every time. The highest concentration of cholesterol is in the brain – 20 percent of the body total. The brain is 60 percent fats and without cholesterol it cannot function effectively. This explanation comes from Psychologytoday.com :

Synapses – the magical areas where communication between brain cells takes place – are lined by cholesterol-rich membranes responsible for passing neurotransmitters like serotonin, GABA, and dopamine back and forth. Myelin, the white matter that insulates brain circuits, is made from tightly-wound membranes containing 75% of the brain’s cholesterol.

Cholesterol also helps guide developing nerve endings to their destinations on ‘lipid rafts’. If the brain is too low in cholesterol, its membranes, synapses, myelin and lipid rafts can’t form or function properly, bringing all brain activity – including mood regulation, learning, and memory – to a screeching halt.

We are witnessing soaring numbers of people with forms of dementia. Is this a coincidence? No, it’s not. There are other reasons for this, too, but if you significantly lower or eliminate cholesterol and fat consumption this is what happens. Check the facts for yourself. Every vegan and vegetarian should read for their own sake the book by David Evans called Low Cholesterol Leads to an Early Death: Evidence from 101 Scientific Papers . There are also the books of Barry Groves including Trick and Treat: How healthy eating is making us ill . I am not saying vegans and vegetarians should change their lifestyle – that’s none of my business. I am saying check the facts first and you won’t get them only by reading mainstream sources. Is it still another ‘by chance’ that the Climate Cult (a stooge of the Death Cult) is demanding a major decrease (ideally the elimination) of meat consumption with its mega sources of cholesterol and fats? The theme is being promoted by pathetically-named documentaries such as Apocalypse Cow: How Meat Killed The Planet fronted by Guardian ‘journalist’ virtue-signaller and fast-asleep New Woker ‘vegan’ George Monbiot who bizarrely shot a deer on the programme and ate it as a burger. Go figure. I understand why vegetarians and vegans choose not to eat animal products and I absolutely respect the intent. I was a vegetarian myself for some 15 years. It is not, however, that simple. Firstly vegans and vegetarians might consider that all life is conscious including the plants they eat themselves. I have written a number of times over the years about research revealing how plants and trees feel pain and stress which can even be generated by the tone of voice and someone’s intent towards them. When people ‘talk’ to plants it generates a wave interaction with the frequency field of the voice and this is picked up by the plant. They may not understand human words, but they pick up the ‘vibe’. A team of scientists at Tel Aviv University published a study in 2019 revealing that tomato and tobacco plants emitted multiple ultrasonic ‘stress’ sounds between 20 and 100 kilohertz when deprived of water or their stems were cut. Plants with no environmental threat or damage emitted less than one ultrasonic sound per hour. Many other experiments have confirmed the theme – plant life is conscious and feels forms of emotional pain and stress when threatened. What does a tree feel when it is cut down? What do other trees feel when it is well established that trees operate in ‘families’ and communicate?

There is no consumption of food in higher frequencies and these moral dilemmas do not arise. Within the simulation there is such density and a comparative deficit of energy that the difference is made up by consuming ‘physical’ food which is really wavefields. I wish that didn’t have to be, but the point to remember is that everything is conscious. We are told that meat eating must end to protect animals when animals eat each other second by second. It is the way the simulation is set up to be a killing field. Animals eat each other to secure the sustenance they need to survive and biologically humans have the same basic make-up and nutritional requirements. We may wish it was different, okay, agreed. But for now that’s how it is. Animals that provide the basis for human food will, of course, disappear altogether as a consequence of what is being demanded by a few imposing their lifestyle choice on everyone else. The meat industry is going to be subjected to full-blown demonisation and financial attacks to secure the desired Cult outcome by claiming it is ‘not sustainable’ – I’ll explain the real significance of ‘sustainable’ in the next chapter. Vegans should make their choices as they see fit and have those choices respected. I just wish the same respect came the other way and self-righteous vegan activists didn’t act like another cult with its deep connections to the Climate Cult which is largely the unknowing puppet of the Death Cult. By all means campaign for animals to be treated humanely – I’m with you – but please open your eyes to what you are being used to bring about. I am not telling people what they should eat. I am saying look at the pattern and how the climate hoax and other excuses are being used to target carbon dioxide, sunlight and cholesterol which, without sufficient quantities, there would truly be extinction. I find the same perceptual arrogance at the extreme end (not everyone) of those who contend that the Earth is flat. If people want to believe that then good luck to them I say. Unfortunately the same respect often doesn’t come the other way. If you don’t accept what they claim you are subject to attacks and dubbed an agent of the elite – even those who have spent their lives exposing the elite and who do more to that end in a month than ‘flat Earth’ extreme obsessives will do in a lifetime. The Earth is ‘flat’ in a sense at the level of its wavefield construct or ‘interference pattern’. Its holographic decoded projection called the ‘physical’ Earth is quite something else. Those who see this differently have every right to do so and I won’t call them agents of the elite just because they believe something that I don’t. Why do so many people insist that what they believe must be accepted by everybody? This book is my view and research. I don’t insist for a second that people have to believe it if it doesn’t make sense to them.

The Cult is exploiting the climate change hoax to pressure people to be vegan and that should start alarm bells ringing. I can tell you after tracking these people for 30 years that they do nothing without intent to harm humanity and if they want the population to be vegan it’s for a reason that benefits the agenda. Some schools are imposing vegan food and banning meat including one in Sweden where preschool teacher Markus Sandström said: ‘The more we thought about it, the better it seemed … sustainable development is our starting point and the meat has a great impact on climate.’ Sandström doesn’t know what he’s talking about. He’s just repeating what he has been programmed to believe so he will pass on that programming to children and enforce it in this case. This is what teachers are there to do from the Cult’s point of view. Vegetarian and vegan diets imposed by schools is a gathering trend with a school in Oxford, England, banning children from bringing their own packed lunches if they are not meat and fish free. We see yet again how the New Woke and climate tyranny works. It is not about winning arguments with freely-debated facts; it’s about imposition. Head teacher Kay Wood said that the move allowed them to serve better quality meals for the same price. Okay, so explain how that scans with banning packed lunches brought from home. How would price be significant when the school is not paying? Who says they are better quality meals when many nutritionists have the opinion that meat and fish are essential to a balanced intake of what the body and brain needs? Who is Ms Wood to make those decisions about what children can eat and its effect on their well-being? A second reason she cited was the yawn, yawn, ‘huge environmental and sustainability benefits’ as she once again repeated the Cult script while not knowing there even is a Cult. Reason number three was that banning meat ‘allows students of all faiths and different dietary requirements to eat together’. She wouldn’t be able to see the deeper consequences of this which is imposing one set of beliefs on everyone. Why wouldn’t you justify that to yourself when I am right. One parent at the school said banning meat and fish had made her children and other pupils hungry, but none of this matters – I am right . A UK property company Igloo Regeneration has decreed that all corporate entertaining and catering must be vegetarian and meals including meat cannot be reimbursed on expenses after they bought the same lie as the schools. They certainly won’t be the last and watch this theme expand because it’s a Cult agenda. There is pressure to introduce meat taxes and we even have people taking neighbours to court for the smell of their barbeques. I am right has spoken and you will comply! Why should you have choice when you are wrong ? There are many lovely vegans who understand this defence of basic freedom. I’m sure others will be cocking their abuse ready to fire. If you want self-righteous abuse by the truckload tell an extreme vegan activist that the world is not as black and white as they think it is. You will see as we go along what the endless references of ‘sustainability’ really mean although these teachers won’t have a clue what that is. They are just repeaters like the entire system in all its forms – repeating the Totalitarian Tiptoe agenda of the Cult like a broken record while thinking it’s true. Where the delete-meat Cult agenda is really going, via veganism, is to laboratory-produced synthetic food for reasons I will be explaining.

So the gas of life is being demonised to provide the foundation of the religious orthodoxy promoted by the Climate Cult and all its associated offshoots like changing what people eat. The next question is why the global Death Cult would go to such lengths to convince us that humans are threatening the planet’s very existence of the world we have come to know. The answer is both clear – and devastating.