The President approved the plan, and announced it tothe public the same day.11In his book, The American Language, H.L. Mencken suggests that the term ‘UnitedNations’ was decided by President Roosevelt during a meeting with WinstonChurchill at the White House in December 1941, shortly before the attack on Pearl Harbor.12 The US delegation at the founding meeting of the UN was like a roll call ofthe CFR. It included Isaiah Bowman, Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Sumner Welles,Norman H. Davis, James T. Shotwell, and the Russian-born Leo Pasvolsky. They wereall CFR members who served during the war on Roosevelt’s Advisory Committee onPost-War Foreign Policies. In all, seventy-four CFR members were in the delegation.This was the vehicle through which the United Nations was manipulated into being.The US delegation at the San Francisco Conference also included: John J. McCloy(CFR chairman from 1953-70, a member of the Committee of 300, the chairman ofthe Ford Foundation and the Rockefellers’ Chase Manhattan Bank, and friend andadvisor to nine presidents from Roosevelt to Reagan); John Foster Dulles (Hitlersupporter, CFR founder, and soon to be Secretary of State); and Nelson Rockefeller(an arch manipulator, four times elected Governor of New York, and vice presidentin the administration of President Gerald Ford). The attitude of John J. McCloytypified that of the manipulators who created the UN. He was a financial advisor tothe Italian fascist government of Benito Mussolini and he played a significant role inNazi Germany for the Harriman/Bush bank which was financing Hitler. McCloysat in Hitler’s private box at the 1936 Olympics in Berlin at the invitation of RudolfHess and Hermann Goring.13 McCloy was also a member of the Bilderberg GroupSteering Committee.The secretary general of the conference was the State Department official andCFR member, Alger Hiss, later exposed as a secret agent employed by the SovietUnion. Hiss was executive secretary of the 1944 Dumbarton Oaks Conference,where he worked with Stalin’s man, Vyacheslav Molotov, on the details of the UNCharter. He was described as President Roosevelt’s ‘top international organisationspecialist’ at the Yalta Conference in the Crimea in February 1945, which was alsoattended by Churchill and Stalin. After guiding the UN into existence, Hiss wasmade president of the infamous Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, anappointment made by John Foster Dulles, who ignored information about Hiss’sespionage when he was told about it in 1946. Later Hiss was exposed and spent 44months in prison.Other covert Communist Party members of the CFR were in the US delegation inSan Francisco for the launch of the UN, among them Dexter White, who was alsorevealed as a Soviet agent. The Council on Foreign Relations directs the UnitedStates policy, whatever ‘party’ is officially in power. As John J. McCloy once said:Whenever we needed a man for a government position we thumbed through theroll of the council members and put through a call to New York (The CFRheadquarters at Harold Pratt House, 58 East 68th Street).14 The granddaughter offormer President Theodore Roosevelt, the newspaper columnist Edith KermitRoosevelt, summed up the grip of the so called ‘Eastern Establishment’ workingthrough the CFR:What is the Establishment’s view-point? Through the Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhowerand Kennedy administrations its ideology is constant: that the best way to fightCommunism is by a One World Socialist State governed by ‘experts’ like themselves. The result has been policies which favour the growth of the superstate, gradualsurrender of United States sovereignty…15Robert W. Lee, writing in the September 1992 edition of The New Americanpointed out that at least fourteen of the eighteen US secretaries of state since theCFR was founded in 1921 have been members of that organisation, including theacting secretary of state at the time of the article, Lawrence Eagleburger. The lasteight directors of the CIA, including George Bush, had been CFR members, andover the previous four decades, the Democratic and Republican Party candidatesfor president or vice president who were (or became) members of the CFR wereDwight D. Eisenhower, Adlai Stevenson, John F. Kennedy, Henry Cabot Lodge,Richard Nixon, Hubert Humphrey, Edmund Muskie, George McGovern, JimmyCarter, Walter Mondale, Gerald Ford, Nelson Rockefeller, George Bush, MichaelDukakis, Geraldine Ferraro, and Bill Clinton.This, then, is the organisation which created the United Nations.16 The UN evenbuilt its headquarters in New York on land given free of charge by the Rockefellers.Besides the Rockefellers, names like Morgan, Warburg, Schiff, and Marburg weremanipulating in the background, behind the politicians and advisors. The UnitedNations was sold to the public as a means to bring peace to the world, to solvedifferences by words, not war. Most of the people who work for the UN genuinelybelieve that is its purpose. They are about to be disillusioned on that score, I’mafraid. The UN is but a ‘Trojan Horse’ for the global fascist/communist tyrannyknown as the New World Order. It is the vehicle through which the worldgovernment and world army are being manipulated into place and through whichpublic opinion is being softened up, by conflicts and propaganda, to accept thispolicy as the only way to bring peace and stability to human affairs. All seven of theUN secretary generals since 1945 have promoted such thinking. The last holder ofthe office, Dr Boutros Boutros-Ghali, began his career under the Egyptian dictator,Gamal Abdel Nasser. Boutros-Ghali called for a permanent UN Army (world army)and for the UN to have the right to levy taxation (world government). Hissuccessor, Kofi Annan, wants the same.The original United Nations has given birth to a stream of connectedorganisations which coordinate the New World Order plan in areas like health(World Health Organisation), population control or – more accurately – eugenics,(the UN Population Fund – UNFPA), economic development and environment (theUN Environment Programme – UNEP), education, science and culture (UNESCO),and the list is getting longer all the time. These are organisations which aredesigned to globalise control of all areas of our lives and we urgently need to wakeup to this. The UN is a front for the Illuminati/Freemasonic hierarchy. In a speechin 1970, Robert Welch, the founder of the John Birch Society in America, predictedwith remarkable accuracy what the United Nations would become:The United Nations hopes and plans – or, more accurately, the insiders, theconspiratorial bosses above it, hope and plan for it-to use population controls, controls over scientific and technological developments, control over arms and militarystrength of individual nations, control over education, control over health, and all thecontrols it can gradually establish under all of the different excuses for internationaljurisdiction that it can devise. These variegated separate controls are to becomecomponents of the gradually materialising total control that it expects to achieve bypretense, deception, persuasion, beguilement, and falsehoods, while the enforcementof such controls by brutal force and terror is also getting under way.17That is what the United Nations was always intended to do; that is what it wascreated to do; that is what it is now doing.The European Economic Community – now The European UnionThe plan to create three global trading blocks which would eventually be mergedinto one is not new. It has been a long-term plan to centralise power in Europe, theAmericas, and Asia-Australia, via groupings promoted initially as free trade areas,but later evolving into the European Union, the American Union, and the PacificUnion. The European Economic Community was the first, and this has beenfollowed by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which involvesthe US, Canada, and Mexico. This agreement was signed by President George Bushon August 12th 1992. In my scores of public talks throughout 1994, I said that thiswould eventually be expanded to encompass the whole of the Americas. This wasnot prophecy, simply knowledge of the game plan. It doesn’t matter what presidentis nominally in power, be it Republican or Democrat, the plan rumbles on. Whatwas it that George Bush, a Republican, said when NAFTA was launched? That hewished to see a free trade area stretching from the top of North America to the tip ofSouth America. What was it that Bill Clinton, a Democrat, said at a gathering ofleaders from throughout the American continent on December 10th 1994?History has given the people of the Americas the chance to build a community ofnations, committed to liberty and the promise of prosperity… early in the next centuryI want to see…a huge free trade zone from Alaska to Argentina.Spot the difference? No, nor me. Another thing I was predicting through 1994,again from knowledge of the agenda, was the creation of the third ‘free trade area’involving Asia and Australia. On November 16th 1994, I picked up a copy of theLondon Daily Telegraph to see that this had been agreed to on the previous day.The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) grouping was accepted at aSummit meeting near Jakarta, Indonesia, attended by Bill Clinton, Paul Keating(the Australian Prime Minister), and heads of the Asian governments. EitherKeating is in on the scam or he is easily duped. Now the process will begin ofevolving the two latest trading blocs into the model used in Europe before mergingthem all into one.The plan for a United States of Europe under centralised control goes backcenturies. It was one of the goals of the Knights Templar. When the Templars were destroyed in their stronghold in France by a combination of the French King andthe Pope, many of those who survived the onslaught regrouped in Scotland and theTemplars reformed under the pseudonym, the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry. Thishas a large number of its members in the high places of influence and power in theworld, not the least in the United States. The men behind the European Community,now the European Union, were Jean Omar Marie Gabriel Monnet (Comm 300), theson of a French brandy merchant; Count Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi (Comm300) from Austria; and Joseph Retinger (Comm 300), a Polish socialist, who formedan organisation called the European Movement to press for central control ofEurope. He was also most influential in the creation of the Bilderberg Group, one ofthe key vehicles for secret government manipulation. Jean Monnet was the mostimportant figure, however, in European union.Monnet went to Canada in 1910, at the age of just twenty to seek new marketsfor the family brandy business. There he linked up with the Hudson Bay Companyand the Lazard Brothers banking operation and became part of the Anglo-Americanscene, even though he was French. He became a confidant to presidents and primeministers, and this won him a highly lucrative contract to ship materials fromCanada to France during the First World War. When the war ended he wasappointed to the Allied Supreme Economic Council and he became advisor to thegroup around Lord Milner (Comm 300) and Colonel House (Comm 300), which waspreparing the Treaty of Versailles and creating the League of Nations. By 1919, hisinfluence and reputation among the manipulators was such that he was named theDeputy Secretary General of The League of Nations.The same names again. Sixyears later he moved to America and became vice president of a company ownedby the Bank of America, called Transamerica. Monnet was now in the perfectposition to coordinate the America-European conspiracy to create the EuropeanCommunity.Count Richard N. Coudenhove-Kalergi wrote a book in 1923, calling for a UnitedStates of Europe. He was named after Richard Wagner, of whom Hitler had saidthat to understand Nazi Germany one had to understand Wagner. A close friend ofthe Count’s father was Theodore Herzl, the founder of Zionism. The Count’s bookwas called Pan Europa, and he went on to form the Pan European Union withbranches right across the continent, supported by leading European politicians, theAnglo-American Establishment, including Colonel House and Herbert Hoover, andthe usual crowd that pop up everywhere. The Count said in his autobiography:At the beginning of 1924, we received a call from Baron Louis de Rothschild; one ofhis friends, Max Warburg, from Hamburg, had read my book and wanted to get to knowus. To my great surprise sure!, Warburg spontaneously sure! offered us 60,000 goldmarks to tide the movement over for its first three years…Max Warburg, who was oneof the most distinguished and wisest men that I have ever come into contact with, hada principle of financing these movements. He remained sincerely interested in PanEurope for his entire life. Max Warburg arranged his 1925 trip to the United States tointroduce me to Paul Warburg and Bernard Baruch. Also among the supporters of the Pan European Movement was WinstonChurchill (Comm 300), who wrote an article in 1930 for the American publication,The Saturday Evening Post, entitled The United States of Europe. This was nineyears before the Second World War for which Churchill so vigorously campaigned -a war that was responsible for creating the European Community. CountCoudenhove-Kalergi was given enthusiastic backing from such ‘unbiased’ sources asJohn Foster Dulles, Nicholas Murray Butler, the president of Columbia Universityand the Carnegie Endowment for International War (sorry, ‘Peace’), and Dr StephenDuggan, the founder and first president of the Institute of Education, which was100% controlled by the Council on Foreign Relations. Those who funded theBolshevik Revolution and both sides in the two World Wars, including Adolf Hitler,were plotting to introduce the European Community as well as the United Nations.Meanwhile, Monnet was also close to Franklin D. Roosevelt, thanks to hisrelationship with the President’s influential aide, Harry Hopkins, who was toRoosevelt what Colonel House had been to President Wilson. Hopkins wasfinanced by the Rockefellers and he was their man in the White House. He wasrecruited by Nelson Rockefeller to work on the New Deal which actually prolongedthe United States depression.19 Both Monnet and Hopkins were supporters of theSoviet Union and Monnet was deeply involved in the lend-lease policies throughwhich vast amounts of weapons, other materials, and knowledge of US nucleartechnology were transferred to the communist world. Organisations like the FederalUnion Movement – later the Atlantic Union Committee and the Atlantic Council ofthe United States – were formed to press for the union of America and Britain. Suchbodies were dominated by CFR members.Among the directors of the Atlantic Council in the 1970s were George Bush(Comm 300) and one of the world’s most influential and tireless manipulators,Henry Kissinger (Comm 300), of whom much more will be revealed as our storyprogresses. The pressure and propaganda for European Union reached new heightsin May 1948, when the United European Movement held its Congress of Europe.The leading advocates of the Movement were Winston Churchill and his son-in-law,the British politician Duncan Sandys, and working behind the scenes to great effectwere Jean Monnet and the creator of the Bilderberg Group, Joseph Retinger. TheCongress adopted seven Resolutions on the political union of Europe. One of themstated, The creation of a United Europe must be regarded as an essential steptowards the creation of a United World world government. Monnet also headedthe Committee for the United States of Europe, which had the same goal.20The post-war American loans to Europe, known as the Marshall Plan orEuropean Recovery Programme (ERP), were used both to provide funds for theEuropean Union movement and to undermine the independence of sovereignstates and increase the pressure for the central control of Europe. This aid plan wassupposed to be the work of General George C. Marshall, President Truman’sSecretary of State, but it is now known that the architects were Jean Monnet andthe Council on Foreign Relations.21 In 1946-1947, a CFR study group was formed toreport on the Reconstruction of Europe. The group was chaired by the lawyer, Charles M. Spofford, and the secretary was David Rockefeller (Comm 300), later tobe head of the Chase Manhattan Bank, the chairman of the CFR, a leadinginfluence in the Bilderberg Group, and creator of another front for the Elite, theTrilateral Commission.Within little more than a year, this CFR ‘study group’ changed its name to theMarshall Plan and was sold as government policy. The man chosen to head theMarshall Plan in Europe was… Averell Harriman (Comm 300), who based himself atthe Rothschild’s Paris Mansion, Hotel Talleyrand. The proposal was not given aneasy ride and there were many congressmen who could see through thesmokescreen. The CFR therefore launched a propaganda offensive by Eliteorganisations to ensure that the policy was accepted. These included the CFRcontrolled business and trade union bodies and, of course, the CFR-controlledmedia. The policy of a United States of Europe was given sterling support from theCFR’s New York Times and Washington Post.The Elite-contrived ‘Cold War’ would also be very useful, as indeed it would beon so many occasions in the decades that followed. The need to make loans toEurope to overcome the threat of communism (which the Elite had created) waseffectively used to win Congressional approval for the Marshall Plan. John J.McCloy (Comm 300), the chairman of the CFR for nearly twenty years, said that hisperiod as US High Commissioner to Germany after the war had shown him howthe use of the communist threat could get things done. People sat up and listenedwhen the Soviet threat was mentioned,22 he said. When the proposals securedapproval, the Marshall Plan executive board included Allen W. Dulles, thenpresident of the CFR; Philip Reed, the chairman of General Electric; the formersecretaries of war, Henry L. Stimson and Robert P. Patterson; and the formerundersecretary of state, Dean Acheson (Comm 300), a member of the CFR who wasin the US delegation at the formation of the United Nations.The first step in the creation of the European Community was the introduction ofthe European Coal and Steel Community, which started in July 1952, and mergedthe coal and steel industries of West Germany, France, Italy, Belgium, theNetherlands, and Luxemburg under one central control. It had the powers to decideprices, investment, raise money, and make decisions by majority voting. It wasintroduced under the name The Schuman Plan (after the French socialist foreignminister and later prime minister, Robert Schuman), but once again the man behindit was Jean Monnet, then head of the French General Planning Commission. Theidea won gushing praise from CFR names like John Foster Dulles and DeanAcheson, and Monnet was awarded the Wateler Peace Prize of two million francs torecognise the international spirit which he had shown in conceiving the Coal andSteel Community….Who made the award? The Carnegie Foundation! Twoadmirers of Monnet, Merry and Serge Bromberger, set out the plan in their book,Jean Monnet And The United States Of Europe:Gradually, it was thought, the supranational authorities, supervised by the EuropeanCouncil of Ministers at Brussels and the Assembly in Strasbourg, would administer all the activities of the Continent. A day would come when governments would be forced toadmit that an integrated Europe was an accomplished fact, without their having had asay in the establishment of its underlying principles. All they would have to do was tomerge all these autonomous institutions into a single federal administration and thenproclaim a United States of Europe.23Monnet and his plotters tried to introduce a European army under their centralcommand. They called for disarmament by the nations and the creation of onearmy. The same is happening today on a global scale. The six members of the Coaland Steel Community signed a treaty to this effect in 1952, but it failed tomaterialise when the French Parliament refused to accept it. Still, on March 25th1957, the six did sign the two Treaties of Rome to create the European EconomicCommunity or Common Market, and the European Atomic Energy Community(Euratom). The negotiations for the Treaties of Rome were controlled by Monnetwith constant help from the CFR network in the United States. This was confirmedby Harvard lecturer, Ernst H. van der Beugel, an honourary secretary-general ofthe Elite’s Bilderberg Group and a member of the Trilateral Commission. In hisbook, From Marshall Aid To Atlantic Partnership (foreword by his friend, HenryKissinger), he says:Monnet and his action committee were unofficially supervising the negotiations and assoon as obstacles appeared, the United States diplomatic machinery was alerted,mostly through Ambassador Bruce…who had immediate access to the top echelon ofthe State Department…At that time, it was usual that if Monnet thought that a particular country madedifficulties in the negotiations, the American diplomatic representative in that countryapproached the Foreign Ministry in order to communicate the opinion of the AmericanGovernment which, in practically all cases, coincided with Monnet’s point of view.24Monnet = Global Elite. The Single European Act, which brought down tradebarriers across Europe from 1992, and the Maastricht Accords for European unionare just more stepping-stones along the road to the United States of Europe underElite control. The stepping-stones approach is used daily to fool the public. Themanipulators know that if we were asked to move from nation state sovereignty toworld government in one leap, even the bewildered herd might ask what was goingon and oppose it. So we are sold a series of intermediate stages which are promotedas isolated and unconnected events. Once we have accepted one, the next isintroduced until the final goal is reached by stealth. It is like putting someone in abath of cold water and then heating it slowly until it boils. Only in the final stagesdoes the victim realise what is happening and by then it may be too late. JosefStalin, the authoritarian dictator of the Soviet Union, explained this process in hisbook, Marxism And The National Question, published in 1942 when the AngloAmerican-communist game plan was obviously well known to him. He wrote: Divide the world into regional groups as a transitional stage to world government.Populations will more readily abandon their national loyalties to a vague regional loyaltythan they will for a world authority. Later, the regionals can be brought all the way into asingle world dictatorship.25Which is precisely what is happening. In 1984, the Soviet KGB defector, AnatoliyGolitsyn, warned that there would be a ‘false liberalisation’ in the Soviet Union andEastern Europe. This would be welcomed by the West, he said, and it would lead toa merger of the European Community and the countries of the former Soviet Union.On the same weekend in December 1994, that Bill Clinton announced plans for theNAFTA free trade area to be expanded across the Americas to Argentina, theEuropean heads of government revealed plans to allow countries of the formerSoviet Union to join the European Union. Events are now moving very quickly. Inthe first draft of this chapter, I wrote that the plan was to eventually merge theformer Soviet Union into the United States of Europe and, before this book wasfinished, it had been officially announced.Look at how far the confidence trick has travelled since the introduction of theEuropean Economic Community, or Common Market. We were told we had to joinor the British economy would collapse. Oh really? The current British deficit inEuropean trade and membership contributions since we joined is closing in on £100billion!26 Once the peoples of Europe had been tricked into believing that if theydidn’t join they would all face disaster, the word economic was dropped from thetitle and it became the European Community (stepping-stone). Later there wasanother name change to the European Union (stepping-stone). We have also had themove towards the centralisation of political power in the community and theerosion of national decision-making (stepping-stone). This was followed by thepressure for a European Central Bank and one European currency (stepping-stone).And the concept of Europe with centralised control administered by a EuropeanCentral Bank, one currency, regional administration and common labour, transportand industrial policies, is exactly what Hitler and the Nazis planned for Europe.They even called their plan the European Economic Community (EuropaischeWirtschaft = gemeinschaft).27In his 1966 book, Tragedy And Hope, Elite ‘insider’ Carroll Quigley explainedhow the process of European integration on all levels was to be achieved instages; Richard N. Gardner (Comm 300) of the CFR was later to say how the planwas to erode it sovereignty piece by piece.28 On November 9th 1988, theEuropean leaders gathered at the Pantheon in Paris to celebrate the centenary ofthe birth of Jean Monnet, the man called ‘the father of Europe’. But what wasthere to celebrate about Monnet’s creation? It has kept the peace in Europe since1945? No, no.